Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.

Difference between revisions of "nationalist anarchism"

From Anarchopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(moving links which don't belong on this page (and changing the name of the section))
(Historical critique)
Line 18: Line 18:
 
===Historical critique===
 
===Historical critique===
 
# [[Lincoln Brigade]]s have been one of the first anti‐[[nationalism|nationalists]], while pro‐[[capitalism|capitalist]] forces were still supporting nationalism in [[Europe]] (see [[Spanish Revolution]]).
 
# [[Lincoln Brigade]]s have been one of the first anti‐[[nationalism|nationalists]], while pro‐[[capitalism|capitalist]] forces were still supporting nationalism in [[Europe]] (see [[Spanish Revolution]]).
# [[Proudhon]] was called “half anarchist” even in his days for having racist and [[sexism|sexist]] parts to his philosophy.
+
# [[Proudhon]] was called “half anarchist” even in his days for having racist and [[sexism|sexist]] inherent in his philosophy.
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==

Revision as of 23:17, 26 March 2008

Anarcho-nationalism is a concept that derives from Ancient Greece and in particular autonomist philosopher Zeno. Anarcho- nationalists believe in autonomy of different region based on the ancient Greek system of Cities- "States". The difference with the other anarchists is that while other anarchists are internationalists , anarcho-nationalists are strongly nationalists ( but without being racists). This again derives from the ancient greek patriotism. In short anarcho-nationalism derives from the ancient Greek autonomy , but it rejects ancient Greek economy and having traces of exploitation, imperialism and a market economy. Anarcho- nationalists are Collectivists. So they combine collectivsm , with ancient Greek autonomism and patriotism. An example of anarcho- Nationalists in the recent years are anarchists in Catalonia who were very patriotic and nationalistic.

Anarchist critique of National Anarchism

This section criticises the topic of the article from the perspective of anarchism. If possible, please keep criticism constructive.
  1. Anarchist movement provides unifying power to all the people
    1. National Anarchism allows the group to exclude certain groups.
  2. Anarchism is anti-discriminatory in its nature
    1. National Anarchism allows for uncontented racism, homophobia, biphobia, transsexism, sexism, ageism.
  3. Anarchy implies elimination of borders between different communities
    1. National Anarchism provides a way for community to make it harder for an individual to leave the group.
    2. National Anarchism provides a way for community to make it harder for an individual to pass through some physical location.
  4. Anarchism is anti‐ageist and anti‐censorship.
    1. National Anarchists allow parents to dominate their childrenʼs information gathering.

Besides that National Anarchism does not critique patriarchy, heterosexism, monosexism, and many other forms of hierarchal social organisation.

Historical critique

  1. Lincoln Brigades have been one of the first anti‐nationalists, while pro‐capitalist forces were still supporting nationalism in Europe (see Spanish Revolution).
  2. Proudhon was called “half anarchist” even in his days for having racist and sexist inherent in his philosophy.

External links