Difference between revisions of "Anti-social action"

Revision as of 21:27, 2 December 2006

Anti-social act, anti-social deed or anti-social behaviour (anti-social behavior US English) is the label that is used to differentiate the behaviour that is dammaging to the community from the crime that is defined by the law of the government.

Causes

Peter Kropotkin outlines the following causes of crimes in Prisons and Their Moral Influence on Prisoners:

• Physical causes are causes that deal with the physical nature of the universe.

examples: weather, hunger

• Physiological causes come directly from the structure of the brain.

example: mental illness

• Social causes are influencing our behaviour through our social interaction and the structure of our communities.

examples: ghetto, discrimination, prison, millitary draft

It must be noted that one more cause is obviously missing:

• Individual choice is influencing all behaviour, especially that of the average human.

examples: vigilanteism,

Types

Anti-social behaviour can be broken down into the following categories:

• Hierarchical crime is an action intended to place a person (possibly oneself) above that person's peers.

examples: government, police, mafia, rape, slavery

• Economic crime is an action to increase one's wealth, without regard to others.

examples: theft, being a landlord, banking, wage labour

• Accidental crime

examples: auto accident

• Mental illness
• Hate crime is an action taken out of intollerance for another group.

examples: Nazism, fascism, Islamofascism, racism, homophobia

Dealing with anti-social behaviour through example

The strongest and the most successful approach to the elimination of anti-social behaviour in the free society is leading by example. All the measures that do not start with taking personal responcibility over one's own actions will fail.

See also: peer pressure

Elimination of idea of vengeance

Much (if not most) of the intentionally anti-social behaviour in our society is the result of the vengeance. The religious dogma of "a tooth for a tooth" is a strong belief in most of the contemporary society. It is important to remember that one of the core differences between anarchism and state socialism is that the latter is based upon science alone, while former uses science while bringing ideas of ethics and spiritual liberation into the realm of discussion.

See also: vigilante violence, prison

Acceptance

This is brought to light in relation to opposition to hate crimes (while is still important to eliminate many other forms), however, the effects of acceptance by already non-anti-social population will not be imidiately seen. Because of that hate crimes will not be eliminated through this alone.

A person cannot be a productive member of the society when one is not accepted into that society on the basis of factors beyond that person's control. As such it is responcibility of every member to ensure that one is leading by example and is accepting of all cultures and groups.

See also: postanarchism (a more accepting form of anarchism)

Acceptance of change

An anti-social member of society must feel confident that in the event of change one will be accepted in the society. This is important to ensure that nobody ends up "in the corner" out of which there is no escape.

In order for this not to be abused, an anti-social member can and should be expected to not simply end the anti-social behaviour, but to go the extra mile in order to lessen the negative effect upon the community that was caused the that person's actions.

Dealing with anti-social behaviour through change of society

Where social causes of crimes dominate the society must be changed to remove those causes.

Economic equality

The simpliest and the most direct way to remove the crimes such as theft and robbery is to eliminate the status simbolism of wealth and to build the society that is economically equal.

Social equality

Where economic equality will not be enough the complete social equality will stop a lot of anti-social acts. Acts of rape and molestation and brought into this world largely because our society puts pressure on each individual to dominate others or be dominated. By removing this pressure many people will find it easier to find releases to their desires through non-hierarchical means.

See also: social equality, prison abolition movement

Dealing with remaining anti-social behaviour

It is foolish to believe that all anti-social behaviour can be dealt with and eliminated. Some will always remain, especially the acts done from idividual choice, the mental illness, and accidental behaviour.

However, it is important not to reinvent the prison system, deportation, or the "nut houses" when working on the sollution to these acts.

Accidents

It is not only foolish, but is criminal in its own right to demand any time to be used up by community to deal with the individual who make an honest mistake. This time is much better used to rectify the effect of that accident and eliminating the possibility of that accident from taking place in the future.

Mental illness

We must remove the belief in the devil and stop trying to exorcise the people who are simply ill. "The insane asylum is always a prison" says Peter Kropotkin (ibid), and later he describes the Belgian village, Gheel, in which peasants have taken mentally ill people into their homes and field work, by doing that they have stopped the anti-social parts of the behaviour of the insane.

Today there are some simmilar communities. Of course, mentally ill person will be different to the person of an average intelligence; however, it does not necessitates that we must treat that person as a sub-human and lie to ourselves that cruelty towards an will help anyone.

See also: mental illness, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

Personal decision

Without removing the acceptance of change stance of the free society, it is possible to ostricise an individual from the community that the person actively shows hostility towards. Ostracism can be only social (not dealing with that person) or geographic (disallowing the person from being in the area used by the community. It can be temporary (for a set amount of time, unless person changes) or semi-permanent (forever, unless person changes).