Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.

Difference between revisions of "animal grazing has negative impacts on the land"

From Anarchopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(....Scope of the problem on both Arguments & Objections sides. Nutrients)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 10: Line 10:
 
* grazing animals provide an environment for parasites, which can then spread to humans
 
* grazing animals provide an environment for parasites, which can then spread to humans
 
* fencing of land for grazing impedes natural animal movements, and affects biosystems
 
* fencing of land for grazing impedes natural animal movements, and affects biosystems
 
+
* All of the effects stated in these arguments against animal grazing are increasingly problematic as the number of animals increases, to the point of ecological disaster
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Line 16: Line 16:
  
 
<div style="background-color:#FFCCCC">
 
<div style="background-color:#FFCCCC">
 
+
* [[soil compaction would be eliminated if we use native animals]]
===[[If we used some native animals, soil compaction would be eliminated (e.g. Kangaroos in Australia)]]===
+
* Nitrogen in animal feces is a catalyst to assist the breakdown of plant materials; provides organic nutrients and organic matter, and micronutrients for organisms such as fungal mycorrhiza, (which aid plants in absorbing nutrients); in short, it is fertilizer.
 
+
* All of the effects stated in the arguments against animal grazing are decreasingly problematic as the number of animals decreases, to a point where they are no greater than in natural ecosystems, in the practices used by nomadic herding cultures
 
</div>
 
</div>
  

Latest revision as of 04:38, 5 January 2011


Arguments[edit]

  • animal grazing causes soil compaction
  • animal grazing causes soil acidification
  • animal grazing causes erosion and topsoil loss
  • animal grazing creates a bias for predominance of nuisance plant and animal species
  • grazing animals provide an environment for parasites, which can then spread to humans
  • fencing of land for grazing impedes natural animal movements, and affects biosystems
  • All of the effects stated in these arguments against animal grazing are increasingly problematic as the number of animals increases, to the point of ecological disaster

Objections[edit]

  • soil compaction would be eliminated if we use native animals
  • Nitrogen in animal feces is a catalyst to assist the breakdown of plant materials; provides organic nutrients and organic matter, and micronutrients for organisms such as fungal mycorrhiza, (which aid plants in absorbing nutrients); in short, it is fertilizer.
  • All of the effects stated in the arguments against animal grazing are decreasingly problematic as the number of animals decreases, to a point where they are no greater than in natural ecosystems, in the practices used by nomadic herding cultures

References for the Arguments[edit]

References for the Objections[edit]

This article is based on a GNU FDL Vegan Wikia article: Animal_Grazing_has_negative_impacts_on_the_land_used_as_pasture Veg