Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.
Difference between revisions of "Template:ARB pic"
From Anarchopedia
Anarchangel (Talk | contribs) |
Anarchangel (Talk | contribs) (Link) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
The Administrative Review Boards weren't authorized to review whether a detainee qualified for POW status, and they weren't authorized to review whether a detainee should have been classified as an "enemy combatant". | The Administrative Review Boards weren't authorized to review whether a detainee qualified for POW status, and they weren't authorized to review whether a detainee should have been classified as an "enemy combatant". | ||
| − | They were authorized to consider whether a detainee should continue to be detained by the United States, because they continued to pose a threat -- or whether they could safely be repatriated to the custody of their home country, or whether they could be set free. | + | They were authorized to consider whether a detainee should continue to be detained by the United States, because they continued to pose a threat -- or whether they could safely be repatriated to the custody of their home country, or whether they could be set free.<ref> |
| + | {{cite web | ||
| + | | url = http://www.defense.gov/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid=3902 | ||
| + | | title = Annual Administrative Review Boards for Enemy Combatants Held at Guantanamo Attributable to Senior Defense Officials | ||
| + | | date = March 6, 2007 | ||
| + | | accessdate = November 12, 2010 | ||
| + | }}</ref> | ||
Revision as of 20:38, 22 August 2012
Hearing room where Guantanamo captive's annual Administrative Review Board hearings convened for captives whose Combatant Status Review Tribunal had already determined they were an "enemy combatant".[1]
Detainees who were determined to have been properly classified as "enemy combatants" were scheduled to have their dossier reviewed at annual Administrative Review Board (WP) hearings.[2] The Administrative Review Boards weren't authorized to review whether a detainee qualified for POW status, and they weren't authorized to review whether a detainee should have been classified as an "enemy combatant".
They were authorized to consider whether a detainee should continue to be detained by the United States, because they continued to pose a threat -- or whether they could safely be repatriated to the custody of their home country, or whether they could be set free.[3]- ↑ Spc Timothy Book (Friday March 10 2006). "Review process unprecedented". JTF-GTMO Public Affairs Office. pp. pg 1. http://www.jtfgtmo.southcom.mil/wire/WirePDF/v6/TheWire-v6-i049-10MAR2006.pdf#1. Retrieved 2007-10-10.
</li>
- ↑ Army Sgt. Sarah Stannard (October 29 2007). "OARDEC provides recommendations to Deputy Secretary of Defense". JTF Guantanamo Public Affairs. http://www.jtfgtmo.southcom.mil/storyarchive/2007/07octstories/102907-2-oardec.html. Retrieved 2008-03-26. </li>
- ↑ Annual Administrative Review Boards for Enemy Combatants Held at Guantanamo Attributable to Senior Defense Officials. URL accessed on November 12, 2010.
</ol>
- ↑ Army Sgt. Sarah Stannard (October 29 2007). "OARDEC provides recommendations to Deputy Secretary of Defense". JTF Guantanamo Public Affairs. http://www.jtfgtmo.southcom.mil/storyarchive/2007/07octstories/102907-2-oardec.html. Retrieved 2008-03-26. </li>
