Difference between revisions of "Talk:List of shock sites"

Latest revision as of 02:36, 16 March 2011

I would keep this because it's one of the few popular and maintained pages here. Also it's useful for many sensitive persons to know about shock sites, to understand their content or avoid them. ~Rev 22 19:14, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

This page MUST stay! There are only very few compiled lists of shocksites. Many other sites just copy wiki's and wiki doesnt even allow editing that listing. Please keep "shock sites"!

I believe i was the person who's copied the starting list from Wikipedia, and i believe that it should stay here. For one thing there's a reason given by anonymous above, and then it does have something to do with anarchism, specifically with the public perception of anarchism. What should happen imho is for us to create a good article about shock site, i'm going to make a mental note of that for myself.  ~ User:Beta_M (VolodyA! V Anarhist) ^Talk 2009 December 20 14:22 _(UTC)

NO

no please. this diverts many teenagers thoughts to the negative ones.........

this kind of websites too must be banned from the internet, because this is not the reason for which we had it. we thought this would improve the knowledge of our race...humans.but what we are doing here with those sites.....[disturbing other good people by the already disturbed ones......].please spread this message after you reading this.

Banned? As in censored? I think you are in the wrong place, please go back to Conservopedia.  ~ User:Beta_M (VolodyA! V Anarhist) ^Talk 2009 December 25 07:05 _(UTC)

Altho' I agree for the most part about this particular case, I don't personally buy into the restriction that editors have to act in an anarchist way on Anarchopedia. Anarchy relies on anarchists to work most effectively, yet we operate in a world that is run by other systems. Some online spam outfit doubled the size of this page with ads, for example; it contributed nothing to the conversation or very much to human knowledge at all; I deleted all of it. That's a WP rule, and it is good practice for us as well, I believe. I assume/know you don't mean that we can't be organized, etc. In fact you probably know all of what I just said. Nevermind. Anarchangel 22:57, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

So we`re linking tons of violent, homophobic, transphobic and overall sexist shit on Anarcho(!?!)pedia?

If this is meant to be a consensual project at all, here's a VETO or definite pro delete. The descriptions alone could at least use a trigger warning(must). This really has to do something with the public perception of anarchism as a politcal direction, it is able to alter it in a totally negative fashion. If I'd known nothing about anarchism before coming here, I wouldn`t want to know any more now. There are enough other places on the web for such stuff, make a neutral article, if you want link to such a list, but for this case: delete! Censorship? Only if you want to allow fascist pages around here too.

Encyclopedia Dramatica

I've rolled back the addition of Encyclopedia Dramatica to this list. It's by no means a shock site; the fact that somebody can find something offensive there is not a reason to add it here. ED clearly states what it is for and is not intended to lure people in with the false sense of security, rather it is the encyclopedia written in a different format than Wikipedia or Anarchopedia.  ~ User:Beta_M (VolodyA! V Anarhist) ^Talk 2010 January 12 09:34 _(UTC)

Sadomasochism.wmv

I think that the video "Sadomasochism.wmv" should be on the list, I heard that people says that the website is sick in a disgusting kind of way.--113.211.201.144 08:25, 17 September 2010 (UTC)