Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.

Difference between revisions of "World Trade Center demolition"

From Anarchopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YsRm8M-qOjQ Loose Change 3rd Edition! MUST SEE! 9/11 Truth] - The definitive, comprehensive discussion of the demolition plot. If you spend only 90 minutes on this subject, spend it here
 
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YsRm8M-qOjQ Loose Change 3rd Edition! MUST SEE! 9/11 Truth] - The definitive, comprehensive discussion of the demolition plot. If you spend only 90 minutes on this subject, spend it here
  
−
As comprehensive as this report is, there is one thing missing: they provided proof that WTC falling is equivalent to controlled demolition. But they did not add proof that the 911 Commission's scenario is equivalent to a failed demolition. And here it is. So you think that the falling top floors would be enough to bring down the rest of the building? Here is an entire building failing to fall, after only one floor had been removed: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sa6z41EOt4o and again, in Australia: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z27UBazwPrI and again, in China: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=8f9_1367035087 and a compilation of Ohio, Maine, South Dakota, Turkey, and Chinese implosion failures : http://strangesounds.org/2013/03/controlled-building-demolition-in-aarau-switzerland-march-8-2013-and-others-that-failed.html
+
As comprehensive as this report is, there is one thing missing: they provided proof that WTC falling is equivalent to controlled demolition. But they did not add proof that the 911 Commission's scenario is equivalent to a failed demolition. And here it is. Never mind free fall speed, do you still think that the falling top floors would be enough to bring down the rest of the building AT ALL? Think again; here is an entire building failing to fall, after only one floor had been removed: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sa6z41EOt4o and again, in Australia: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z27UBazwPrI and again, in China: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=8f9_1367035087 and a compilation of Ohio, Maine, South Dakota, Turkey, and China implosion failures : http://strangesounds.org/2013/03/controlled-building-demolition-in-aarau-switzerland-march-8-2013-and-others-that-failed.html
  
 
* http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAAztWC5sT8&list=PLDDDE2465C8034D06
 
* http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAAztWC5sT8&list=PLDDDE2465C8034D06

Revision as of 16:08, 30 September 2013

Loose Change 3rd Edition! MUST SEE! 9/11 Truth - The definitive, comprehensive discussion of the demolition plot. If you spend only 90 minutes on this subject, spend it here

As comprehensive as this report is, there is one thing missing: they provided proof that WTC falling is equivalent to controlled demolition. But they did not add proof that the 911 Commission's scenario is equivalent to a failed demolition. And here it is. Never mind free fall speed, do you still think that the falling top floors would be enough to bring down the rest of the building AT ALL? Think again; here is an entire building failing to fall, after only one floor had been removed: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sa6z41EOt4o and again, in Australia: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z27UBazwPrI and again, in China: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=8f9_1367035087 and a compilation of Ohio, Maine, South Dakota, Turkey, and China implosion failures : http://strangesounds.org/2013/03/controlled-building-demolition-in-aarau-switzerland-march-8-2013-and-others-that-failed.html

See also

Retrieved from "http://eng.anarchopedia.org/index.php?title=World_Trade_Center_demolition&oldid=56292"