Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.

World Trade Center demolition

From Anarchopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Loose Change 3rd Edition! MUST SEE! 9/11 Truth - The definitive, comprehensive discussion of the demolition plot. If you spend only 90 minutes on this subject, spend it here

As comprehensive as this report is, there is one thing missing: they provided proof that WTC falling is equivalent to controlled demolition. But they did not add evidence that the 911 Commission's scenario is equivalent to a failed demolition. And here it is. Never mind free fall speed, do you still think that the falling top floors would be enough to bring down the rest of the building AT ALL? Think again. Pancaking is a myth. In real life, the energy of multiple floors of a falling building is insufficient to do any noticeable damage to the falling sections. Now, that is a considerably different thing to doing damage to floors beneath, as force is directed mostly downwards, but seeing it do no damage at all is quite impressive. Here is an entire building failing to fall, after only one floor had been removed: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sa6z41EOt4o and again, in Australia: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z27UBazwPrI and again, in China: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=8f9_1367035087 and a compilation of Ohio, Maine, South Dakota, Turkey, and China implosion failures : http://strangesounds.org/2013/03/controlled-building-demolition-in-aarau-switzerland-march-8-2013-and-others-that-failed.html

Unsatisfied in the number of floors removed? Or you require more force to be applied to the structure; you need a larger number of floors above? Here are at least six floors removed, with twelve above-the structure falls into its own footprint...and stays upright: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UsePUn5-88c&list=PLFBF27662AD31945A

The principle is sound. But the details still need to be worked out. To be fair, there were twenty-five floors above the WTC's 85th. On the other hand, all the failed demolitions shown were buildings falling onto rubble directly on the ground. Some of the force of the falling structure hitting the rubble could be transferred to the rubble, and some to the ground. Most of it, though, would be transferred to the falling structure itself. The top 25 floors of the WTC by contrast were falling onto rubble, and the whole rest of the structure, where a considerable amount of force could be absorbed, with a considerably smaller amount even reaching the ground-the force on the falling structure itself would therefore be much less. And although there were eight floors damaged at the WTC, it stretches the imagination too far to believe that even as many as six of them could have failed simultaneously. So, to sum up, WTC would have been more floors, falling less far than the failed demolitions, with more of the force being taken up by the structure itself.

See also[edit]

Retrieved from "http://eng.anarchopedia.org/index.php?title=World_Trade_Center_demolition&oldid=56359"