Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.

Difference between revisions of "Individualist anarchism"

From Anarchopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (anarcho-individualism moved to individualist anarchism)
(→‎Individualist anarchists and private property)
Line 8: Line 8:
 
== Individualist anarchists and private property ==
 
== Individualist anarchists and private property ==
  
−
Individualist anarchists are claimed as part of their tradition by [[anarcho-capitalism|anarcho-capitalists]], in turn, some individualist anarchists claim some works by anarcho-capitalists as part of their tradition, though without fully adhering to them.
+
Anarhistii individualisti sunt cunoscuti ca parte a traditiei lor de [[anarcho-capitalism|anarho-capitalisti]], pe de alta parte, cativa anarhisti individualisti recunosc o seama de lucrari a anarho-capitalistilor ca parte a traditiei, dar fara a fii de acord cu ele in totalitate.
  
−
[[libertarian socialism|Libertarian socialists]] insist that many of these authors, after and including [[Pierre-Joseph Proudhon]], rejected essential foundations of [[capitalism]], namely the legalism of private property (as opposed to the mere right to use), particulary with regard to land, and the charging of interest or rent.
+
[[libertarian socialism|Socialistii libertarieni]] insista ca multi din acesti autori, incluzandu-l si pe [[Pierre-Joseph Proudhon]], au respins bazele esentiale ale [[capitalism|capitalismului]], si anume legalitatea proprietatii private (ca fiind in opozitie cu simplul drept de folosinta), in special cu privire la pamant, si plata interesului sau a chiriei.
  
−
[[anarcho-capitalism|Anarcho-capitalists]] appreciate
+
[[anarcho-capitalism|Anarho-capitalistii]] apreciaza accentul pe care acesti ganditori l-au pus pe drepturile individuale sau libertate, si pe conceptiile bazate pe piata decat pe cele bazate pe [[collectivism|colectivism]]; ei sunt de acord cu [[Frederic Bastiat]] [[Frederic Bastiat/debate with Proudhon|ca un raspuns lui Proudhon]].
−
the emphasis given by these thinkers on individual rights and liberty,
+
−
and on market-based approaches rather than [[collectivism]]; they agree
+
−
with [[Frederic Bastiat]] in his [[Frederic Bastiat/debate with Proudhon|responses to Proudhon]].
+
  
−
Anarcho-capitalists can think also as well as [[Max Stirner]] who is arguably the most [[philosophy|philosophically]] oriented of these individual anarchists, rejected Proudhon's ideas about property as a collective good, but also rejected all kinds of [[liberalism]] and the idea of rights to personal properties as an illusion or "ghost", clearly stating that there is no divine right to own anything, you only have what you have and that's it. In Stirner's view there are no [[morality|moral]] obligations attached to property, or anything else for that matter. Thus he deems both Proudhon's concept of "individual property as theft" (paraphrased) ''and'' the [[libertarianism|libertarian]] idea of property as a natural principle as founded in [[superstition|superstitious]] beliefs. (In this concept he also explicitly included all "immaterial" or "spiritual" posessions, see ''[[The Ego and His Own]]''.)
+
Anarho-capitalistii ar putea de altfel sa gandeasca precum [[Max Stirner]] care este, discutabil, dintre anarhistii individualisti, cel cu orientarea cea mai [[philosophy|filosofica]], a respins ideile lui Proudhon despre proprietate ca un bun colectiv, dar si toate felurile de [[liberalism]] precum si ideea de drept la proprietatea personala ca  o iluzie sau "fantoma", exprimand clar ca nu exista nici un drept divin de a poseda ceva, omul doar are ce are si atat. In viziunea lui Stimer nu exista nici o obligatie [[morality|morala]] legata de proprietate sau orice altceva in ceea ce priveste. Astfel el considera ambele conceptii ale lui Proudhon, "propretatea individuala ca furt"(parafrazat) ''si'' ideea [[libertarianism|libertariana]] de proprietate ca un principiu natural fondat pe [[superstition|superstitii]]. (In acest concept el include explicit toate posesiunile "fara insemnatate" sau "spirituale", vezi si ''[[The Ego and His Own]]''.)
  
 
== External links ==
 
== External links ==

Revision as of 21:04, 3 March 2007


Individualist anarchism is a variety of anarchism that emphasises the importance of the individual. Several classical anarchist thinkers, such as Josiah Warren, Benjamin Tucker, Lysander Spooner, Max Stirner, Dora Marsden and Joseph Labadie, are known as individualist anarchists.

Their works argue for the sovereignty of each individual within their own life. Other such writers include Henry David Thoreau and John Henry Mackay.

Individualist anarchists and private property

Anarhistii individualisti sunt cunoscuti ca parte a traditiei lor de anarho-capitalisti, pe de alta parte, cativa anarhisti individualisti recunosc o seama de lucrari a anarho-capitalistilor ca parte a traditiei, dar fara a fii de acord cu ele in totalitate.

Socialistii libertarieni insista ca multi din acesti autori, incluzandu-l si pe Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, au respins bazele esentiale ale capitalismului, si anume legalitatea proprietatii private (ca fiind in opozitie cu simplul drept de folosinta), in special cu privire la pamant, si plata interesului sau a chiriei.

Anarho-capitalistii apreciaza accentul pe care acesti ganditori l-au pus pe drepturile individuale sau libertate, si pe conceptiile bazate pe piata decat pe cele bazate pe colectivism; ei sunt de acord cu Frederic Bastiat ca un raspuns lui Proudhon.

Anarho-capitalistii ar putea de altfel sa gandeasca precum Max Stirner care este, discutabil, dintre anarhistii individualisti, cel cu orientarea cea mai filosofica, a respins ideile lui Proudhon despre proprietate ca un bun colectiv, dar si toate felurile de liberalism precum si ideea de drept la proprietatea personala ca o iluzie sau "fantoma", exprimand clar ca nu exista nici un drept divin de a poseda ceva, omul doar are ce are si atat. In viziunea lui Stimer nu exista nici o obligatie morala legata de proprietate sau orice altceva in ceea ce priveste. Astfel el considera ambele conceptii ale lui Proudhon, "propretatea individuala ca furt"(parafrazat) si ideea libertariana de proprietate ca un principiu natural fondat pe superstitii. (In acest concept el include explicit toate posesiunile "fara insemnatate" sau "spirituale", vezi si The Ego and His Own.)

External links

This article contains content from Wikipedia. Current versions of the GNU FDL article Anarcho-individualism on WP may contain information useful to the improvement of this article WP
Retrieved from "http://eng.anarchopedia.org/index.php?title=Individualist_anarchism&oldid=21184"