Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.

Difference between revisions of "User talk:Weapon"

From Anarchopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(eco-anarchism and green anarchism)
 
(New section: non-proper nouns)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
Hi, i just want to say that i don't really agree with the move of green anarchism into eco-anarchism. They '''are''' related, but hardly one of the same. Animal lib for example is a large part of green anarchism, but isn't really eco-anarchist (although it is eco-anarchist friendly), on the other hand there are things in eco-anarchism which aren't green anarchist. &nbsp;~&nbsp;[[User:Beta_M|User:]][[Buddhism|B]][[ethics|e]][[Taoism|t]][[anarchism|a]][[postmodernism|_]][[metaphysics|M]] (VolodyA!&nbsp;V&nbsp;Anarhist) <span class="plainlinksneverexpand"><sup>[{{fullurl:User_talk:Beta_M|action=edit&section=new}} Talk]</sup></span> [[2008]] [[July 11]] 11:38 <sub>([[Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]])</sub>
 
Hi, i just want to say that i don't really agree with the move of green anarchism into eco-anarchism. They '''are''' related, but hardly one of the same. Animal lib for example is a large part of green anarchism, but isn't really eco-anarchist (although it is eco-anarchist friendly), on the other hand there are things in eco-anarchism which aren't green anarchist. &nbsp;~&nbsp;[[User:Beta_M|User:]][[Buddhism|B]][[ethics|e]][[Taoism|t]][[anarchism|a]][[postmodernism|_]][[metaphysics|M]] (VolodyA!&nbsp;V&nbsp;Anarhist) <span class="plainlinksneverexpand"><sup>[{{fullurl:User_talk:Beta_M|action=edit&section=new}} Talk]</sup></span> [[2008]] [[July 11]] 11:38 <sub>([[Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]])</sub>
 +
 +
== non-proper nouns ==
 +
 +
Also, can you please explain your rationale for Capital Letters For Non-Proper Nouns in the articles. I understand the reason why [[Wikipedia]] does that, it has to do with the historical problem with MediaWiki software, but we don't have that. Personally i think that there's no reason why non-proper nouns should be capitalised, but i'm open to the discussion. &nbsp;~&nbsp;[[User:Beta_M|User:]][[Buddhism|B]][[ethics|e]][[Taoism|t]][[anarchism|a]][[postmodernism|_]][[metaphysics|M]] (VolodyA!&nbsp;V&nbsp;Anarhist) <span class="plainlinksneverexpand"><sup>[{{fullurl:User_talk:Beta_M|action=edit&section=new}} Talk]</sup></span> [[2008]] [[July 11]] 12:22 <sub>([[Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]])</sub>

Revision as of 12:22, 11 July 2008

eco-anarchism and green anarchism

Hi, i just want to say that i don't really agree with the move of green anarchism into eco-anarchism. They are related, but hardly one of the same. Animal lib for example is a large part of green anarchism, but isn't really eco-anarchist (although it is eco-anarchist friendly), on the other hand there are things in eco-anarchism which aren't green anarchist.  ~ User:Beta_M (VolodyA! V Anarhist) Talk 2008 July 11 11:38 (UTC)

non-proper nouns

Also, can you please explain your rationale for Capital Letters For Non-Proper Nouns in the articles. I understand the reason why Wikipedia does that, it has to do with the historical problem with MediaWiki software, but we don't have that. Personally i think that there's no reason why non-proper nouns should be capitalised, but i'm open to the discussion.  ~ User:Beta_M (VolodyA! V Anarhist) Talk 2008 July 11 12:22 (UTC)