Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.
Difference between revisions of "Anarcho-Capitalism"
(Revert. The capitalists have their own sites, really, this isnt a pro-capitalist site folks.) |
m (Reverted edits by 151.204.254.237 (Talk); changed back to last version by RoyceChristian) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | {{Voice of Freedom|238000|Ownership of Self}} | |
| − | + | [[Image:Anarcho-capitalist flag.svg|thumb|right|anarcho-capitalist flag]] | |
| − | Anarcho- | + | '''Anarcho-capitalism''' is a [[libertarian]] view that, while believing in [[personal freedom]]s, varies from [[anarcho-socialism]] on the matter of [[property]] rights. Anarcho-capitalists often agree with more traditional Anarchists on criticisms of the capitalist system today, regarding it as "state sponsored capitalism". Unlike traditional Anarchists, Anarcho-capitalists use the term "[[capitalism]]" in a different manner, to represent society without coercion and government, which differs from the mainstream use of the term. [[Murray Rothbard]], an [[Austrian economist]] influenced by individualist anarchists like [[Benjamin Tucker]] and [[Lysander Spooner]], is often thought of as the founder of modern [[anarcho-capitalism]], although [[anarcho-capitalist]] themes can be found as far back as [[Gustave de Molinari]] and his landmark work, [[The Production of Security]], as well as the works of [[Frederic Bastiat]]. |
| − | + | == Varying Views on Intellectual Property == | |
| − | Anarcho-capitalists | + | While some Anarcho-capitalists support intellectual property, many oppose it, saying that intellectual property infringes on physical property. Jeremy Sapienza, founder [http://www.anti-state.com anti-state.com] writes, "Is there nothing more preposterous than equating intellectual property, whatever the hell that is, with real, personal property?"[http://www.lewrockwell.com/sapienza/sapienza36.html] The debate over intellectual property among Anarcho-capitalists is still on-going. |
| − | + | == Wage Labor == | |
| + | Anarcho-capitalists state that an employer-employee relationship is an elaborate and mutually profitable form of voluntary association. They resent government as a parasite that corrupts, biases, impedes and distorts what would otherwise be peaceful fair and free associations. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Anarcho-capitalists consider that in the consent to a contract, that each party was free to refuse, is evidence and guarantees that the contract is legitimate and beneficial. They claim that any external power capable of preventing such relationship is itself an oppression to be fought. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Anarcho-capitalists argue that, no matter what social organization may or may not exist, social organizations will never eliminate the basic human requirement to work in order to support themselves. Therefore an objection based on a constraint that cannot be overcome is useless to argue about and not a rational objection at all. They also argue that while someone may not be able to refuse to work in general, one has the largest choice of employers with the diversity of a free market economy, and that what matters is that no given employer/employee contract be coercive. Thus, Anarcho-capitalists believe that an individual may choose to work in any manner they wish, be it for a wage or for some other means of payment, so long as there is no coercion involved. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Anarcho-socialist Criticism About Anarcho-capitalism == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Anarcho-capitalism is a view that departs from Anarcho-socialist theory in that it regards only the state, which it defines as a monopoly on force, as unnecessary and harmful to human society. It emerged in the [[1950s]] out of the tradition of [[classical liberalism]] (see [[libertarianism]]) and generally sets itself in contrast to more conservative anarchist theories exemplified in the use the words 'capitalism' and 'free market'. In its embrace of capitalist economics, Anarcho-capitalism contradicts classical [[anarchism]], which historically and currently has been anti-capitalist. Social anarchists generally argue that anarcho-capitalism isn't a form of [[anarchism]] at all, as it differs on what constitutes illegitimate hierarchy often denying a central basis of classical anarchist theory that advocates the abolition of all hierarchy. Anarcho-socialists generally believe that capitalism cannot exist without enforcement of an economic class system, thus it is impossible to remove coercive hierarchical relationships from a capitalist system. Being based in in liberalism, Anarcho-capitalism holds that individuals should be free to compete with other individuals. [[L. Susan Brown]], an [[anarcha-feminism|anarcha-feminist]], noted that this belief in competition means that individuals are free to take advantage of one another in order to satisfy an ends, rather than granting individuals freedom for the sake of freedom. | ||
[[Category:Political theories]] | [[Category:Political theories]] | ||
[[Category:Anarcho-capitalism]] | [[Category:Anarcho-capitalism]] | ||
| + | [[fr:Critiques de l'anarcho-capitalisme]] | ||
| + | [[it:anarco-capitalismo]] | ||
Revision as of 03:09, 10 January 2008
|
Echo of Freedom, Radical Podcast has a podcast related to this aticle Ownership of Self |
EoF |
Anarcho-capitalism is a libertarian view that, while believing in personal freedoms, varies from anarcho-socialism on the matter of property rights. Anarcho-capitalists often agree with more traditional Anarchists on criticisms of the capitalist system today, regarding it as "state sponsored capitalism". Unlike traditional Anarchists, Anarcho-capitalists use the term "capitalism" in a different manner, to represent society without coercion and government, which differs from the mainstream use of the term. Murray Rothbard, an Austrian economist influenced by individualist anarchists like Benjamin Tucker and Lysander Spooner, is often thought of as the founder of modern anarcho-capitalism, although anarcho-capitalist themes can be found as far back as Gustave de Molinari and his landmark work, The Production of Security, as well as the works of Frederic Bastiat.
Varying Views on Intellectual Property
While some Anarcho-capitalists support intellectual property, many oppose it, saying that intellectual property infringes on physical property. Jeremy Sapienza, founder anti-state.com writes, "Is there nothing more preposterous than equating intellectual property, whatever the hell that is, with real, personal property?"[1] The debate over intellectual property among Anarcho-capitalists is still on-going.
Wage Labor
Anarcho-capitalists state that an employer-employee relationship is an elaborate and mutually profitable form of voluntary association. They resent government as a parasite that corrupts, biases, impedes and distorts what would otherwise be peaceful fair and free associations.
Anarcho-capitalists consider that in the consent to a contract, that each party was free to refuse, is evidence and guarantees that the contract is legitimate and beneficial. They claim that any external power capable of preventing such relationship is itself an oppression to be fought.
Anarcho-capitalists argue that, no matter what social organization may or may not exist, social organizations will never eliminate the basic human requirement to work in order to support themselves. Therefore an objection based on a constraint that cannot be overcome is useless to argue about and not a rational objection at all. They also argue that while someone may not be able to refuse to work in general, one has the largest choice of employers with the diversity of a free market economy, and that what matters is that no given employer/employee contract be coercive. Thus, Anarcho-capitalists believe that an individual may choose to work in any manner they wish, be it for a wage or for some other means of payment, so long as there is no coercion involved.
Anarcho-socialist Criticism About Anarcho-capitalism
Anarcho-capitalism is a view that departs from Anarcho-socialist theory in that it regards only the state, which it defines as a monopoly on force, as unnecessary and harmful to human society. It emerged in the 1950s out of the tradition of classical liberalism (see libertarianism) and generally sets itself in contrast to more conservative anarchist theories exemplified in the use the words 'capitalism' and 'free market'. In its embrace of capitalist economics, Anarcho-capitalism contradicts classical anarchism, which historically and currently has been anti-capitalist. Social anarchists generally argue that anarcho-capitalism isn't a form of anarchism at all, as it differs on what constitutes illegitimate hierarchy often denying a central basis of classical anarchist theory that advocates the abolition of all hierarchy. Anarcho-socialists generally believe that capitalism cannot exist without enforcement of an economic class system, thus it is impossible to remove coercive hierarchical relationships from a capitalist system. Being based in in liberalism, Anarcho-capitalism holds that individuals should be free to compete with other individuals. L. Susan Brown, an anarcha-feminist, noted that this belief in competition means that individuals are free to take advantage of one another in order to satisfy an ends, rather than granting individuals freedom for the sake of freedom.
