Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:In Defense of Anarchism"
From Anarchopedia
(re: copyright) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ==Copyright== | ||
This is the best essay I've seen so far, and nothing that I disagree about, except for this: Why does this have copyright notice on it if this is licensed under the GNU FDL? [[User:Anonymity|'''''<sub><sub><big><font color="#EC4">A</font></big><font color="#009800">NO</font><font color="#00E90A">N</font><font color="#093180">Y</font><font color="#228C22">MI</font></sub></sub>''''']][[User talk:Anonymity|'''''<sub><sub><font color="#43A901">T</font></sub></sub>''''']][[User:Anonymity|'''''<sub><sub><font color="#c08">Y</font></sub></sub>''''']][[Special:Emailuser/Anonymity|<sup><font color="#C93">@</font></sup>]] 13:49, 30 October 2007 (UTC) | This is the best essay I've seen so far, and nothing that I disagree about, except for this: Why does this have copyright notice on it if this is licensed under the GNU FDL? [[User:Anonymity|'''''<sub><sub><big><font color="#EC4">A</font></big><font color="#009800">NO</font><font color="#00E90A">N</font><font color="#093180">Y</font><font color="#228C22">MI</font></sub></sub>''''']][[User talk:Anonymity|'''''<sub><sub><font color="#43A901">T</font></sub></sub>''''']][[User:Anonymity|'''''<sub><sub><font color="#c08">Y</font></sub></sub>''''']][[Special:Emailuser/Anonymity|<sup><font color="#C93">@</font></sup>]] 13:49, 30 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
+ | :Because GNU FDL means nothing if the text isn't copyrighted... FDL is a licence which works on top of the existing copyright laws. ~ [[User:Beta_M|User:]][[Buddhism|B]][[ethics|e]][[Taoism|t]][[anarchism|a]][[postmodernism|_]][[metaphysics|M]] (VolodyA! V Anarhist) <span class="plainlinksneverexpand"><sup>[{{fullurl:User_talk:Beta_M|action=edit§ion=new}} Talk]</sup></span> [[2007]] [[October 30]] 14:35 <sub>([[Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]])</sub> |
Latest revision as of 14:35, 30 October 2007
Copyright[edit]
This is the best essay I've seen so far, and nothing that I disagree about, except for this: Why does this have copyright notice on it if this is licensed under the GNU FDL? ANONYMITY@ 13:49, 30 October 2007 (UTC)