User talk:Anonymity

Thanks

Thanks for bringing up the subject of "sysop". I thought everyone here was a sysop too, but I'm still a little confused. I guess not everyone is one. I don't know. --Grrrlriot 16:39, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

What anarchism is not.

I am an anarcho-communist. A great deal of Kropoktininblack's edits seem to be basically attacks on anarcho-capitalism. I agree that the other version isn't perfect, but his is basically a rant. Zazaban 14:54, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

I was simply reverting the entire thing, I didn't fish through it. And I did try to negotiate with him earlier on. Also, I disagree totally that anarcho-capitalism is some statist conspiracy to destroy anarchism, I think that's insane. Zazaban 20:08, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Anonymity, KiB was a frustrating poster here who, although I think was genuine in his concern, was extremely overzealous and confused not attacking a philosophy with supporting it. Both me an Zazaban tried to negotiate with him suggesting a possible cooperation, but he would not here of it instead turning much of his post into rant. There was little information contained within his edits. Originally the 'what anarchism is not' article was immature, as was Kropotkins edits. I'm an Agorist. Please do not confuse this with your standard Anarcho-Capitalist. The first quote where I distinguish between different types of libertarianism was supposed to provide a clear distinction between the 'Americanised' usage by designating it with a L and the European with a l. I was not insinuating anything (in fact I was trying to keep things as unbiased as possible and merely trying to point out that Anarcho-Capitalists as well as other market Anarchists reject them. If there is some common ground between Anarcho-Capitalists and, as many here would put it, the vast majority of Anarchists, what is wrong with that?

The latter block you quoted was a clean up of a previous contribution. If you want to further add to it, go ahead. I tried not to add or remove anything and to get to the point of the matter. I realise it is a social Anarchist criticism of Anarcho-Capitalism so I tried not to go either way - I try not to edit things that don't reflect my views. It's just that the original piece needed a clean up and no one else seemed to be bothered.--RoyceChristian 11:40, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

I was the one who originally used 'classical' for lack of a better word in an attempt to try and avoid insulting people. I am aware of the whole 'tradition' thing, but that is your argument to include, like I said, I only tried to clean up what was there originally - before KiB started editing. I'm not going to argue, here at lest, your predisposition to Anarcho-Capitalists but though they retain an Ayn Rand influence, they are definitely not Objectivists and definitely not Randroids. I've dealt with both kinds an Anarcho-Capitalists are not either. I will argue that we need to represent Anarcho-Capitalism accurately and not smear it with false labels.

The Problem with KiB's edits was the body of them was mostly rants or uninformative. What he did say that was of value had already b been said more accurately, though it could possibly be worked in. Additionally, towards the end we tried another attempt at negotiating, but KiB had already left.

--RoyceChristian 11:40, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Talk page protection.

We can't really protect talk pages. This contradicts their use. So i think i'll unprotect Talk:Gay and Lesbian Kingdom of the Coral Sea Islands unless there is a really good reason not to.  ~ User:Beta_M (VolodyA! V Anarhist) ^Talk 2008 February 21 11:14 _(UTC)