Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.

Difference between revisions of "WikiLeaks leaks"

From Anarchopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Start w info from WP)
(No difference)

Revision as of 08:58, 4 December 2010

See also [[WikiLeaks

Although WikiLeaks began as an informative site, it is best known for its recent leaks of US government documents.

Pre-2009

Apparent Somali assassination order

WikiLeaks posted its first document in December 2006, a decision to assassinate government officials signed by Sheikh Hassan Dahir Aweys.[1] The New Yorker has reported that

[Julian] Assange and the others were uncertain of its authenticity, but they thought that readers, using Wikipedia-like features of the site, would help analyze it. They published the decision with a lengthy commentary, which asked, “Is it a bold manifesto by a flamboyant Islamic militant with links to Bin Laden? Or is it a clever smear by US intelligence, designed to discredit the Union, fracture Somali alliances and manipulate China?” ... The document’s authenticity was never determined, and news about WikiLeaks quickly superseded the leak itself.[1]

Daniel arap Moi family corruption

On 31 August 2007, The Guardian (Britain) featured on its front page a story about corruption by the family of the former Kenyan leader Daniel arap Moi. The newspaper stated that the source of the information was WikiLeaks.[2]

Bank Julius Baer lawsuit

In February 2008, the wikileaks.org domain name was taken offline after the Swiss Bank Julius Baer sued WikiLeaks and the wikileaks.org domain registrar, Dynadot, in a court in California, United States, and obtained a permanent injunction ordering the shutdown.[3][4] WikiLeaks had hosted allegations of illegal activities at the bank's Cayman Island branch.[3] WikiLeaks' U.S. Registrar, Dynadot, complied with the order by removing its DNS entries. However, the website remained accessible via its numeric IP address, and online activists immediately mirrored WikiLeaks at dozens of alternative websites worldwide.[5]

The American Civil Liberties Union and the Electronic Frontier Foundation filed a motion protesting the censorship of WikiLeaks. The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press assembled a coalition of media and press that filed an amicus curiae brief on WikiLeaks' behalf. The coalition included major U.S. newspaper publishers and press organisations, such as the American Society of Newspaper Editors, The Associated Press, the Citizen Media Law Project, The E.W. Scripps Company, the Gannett Company, The Hearst Corporation, the Los Angeles Times, the National Newspaper Publishers Association, the Newspaper Association of America and The Society of Professional Journalists. The coalition requested to be heard as a friend of the court to call attention to relevant points of law that it believed the court had overlooked (on the grounds that WikiLeaks had not appeared in court to defend itself, and that no First Amendment issues had yet been raised before the court). Amongst other things, the coalition argued that:[5]
"WikiLeaks provides a forum for dissidents and whistleblowers across the globe to post documents, but the Dynadot injunction imposes a prior restraint that drastically curtails access to Wikileaks from the Internet based on a limited number of postings challenged by Plaintiffs. The Dynadot injunction therefore violates the bedrock principle that an injunction cannot enjoin all communication by a publisher or other speaker."[5]

The same judge, Judge Jeffrey White, who issued the injunction vacated it on 29 February 2008, citing First Amendment concerns and questions about legal jurisdiction.[6] WikiLeaks was thus able to bring its site online again. The bank dropped the case on 5 March 2008.[7] The judge also denied the bank's request for an order prohibiting the website's publication.[5]

The Executive Director of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, Lucy Dalglish, commented:

"It's not very often a federal judge does a 180 degree turn in a case and dissolves an order. But we're very pleased the judge recognized the constitutional implications in this prior restraint."[5]

Guantánamo Bay procedures

A copy of Standard Operating Procedures for Camp Delta–the protocol of the U.S. Army at the Guantánamo Bay detention camp–dated March 2003 was released on the WikiLeaks website on 7 November 2007.[8] The document, named "gitmo-sop.pdf", is also mirrored at The Guardian.[9] Its release revealed some of the restrictions placed over detainees at the camp, including the designation of some prisoners as off-limits to the International Committee of the Red Cross, something that the U.S. military had in the past repeatedly denied.[10]

On 3 December 2007, WikiLeaks released a copy of the 2004 edition of the manual,[11] together with a detailed analysis of the changes.[12]

Scientology

On 7 April 2008, WikiLeaks reported receiving a letter (dated 27 March) from the Religious Technology Centre claiming ownership of several recently leaked documents pertaining to OT Levels within the Church of Scientology. These same documents were at the center of a 1994 scandal. The email stated:
"The Advanced Technology materials are unpublished, copyrighted works. Please be advised that your customer's action in this regard violates United States copyright law. Accordingly, we ask for your help in removing these works immediately from your service. – Moxon and Kobrin[13]"

The letter continued on to request the release of the logs of the uploader, which would remove their anonymity. WikiLeaks responded with a statement released on Wikinews stating: "in response to the attempted suppression, WikiLeaks will release several thousand additional pages of Scientology material next week",[14] and did so.

Sarah Palin's Yahoo email account contents

In September 2008, during the 2008 United States presidential election campaigns, the contents of a Yahoo account belonging to Sarah Palin (the running mate of Republican presidential nominee John McCain) were posted on WikiLeaks after being hacked into by members of Anonymous.[15] It has been alleged by Wired that contents of the mailbox indicate that she used the private Yahoo account to send work-related messages, in violation of public record laws.[16] The hacking of the account was widely reported in mainstream news outlets.[17][18][19] Although WikiLeaks was able to conceal the hacker's identity, the source of the Palin emails was eventually publicly identified as David Kernell, a 20-year-old economics student at the University of Tennessee and the son of Democratic Tennessee State Representative Mike Kernell from Memphis,[20] whose email address (as listed on various social networking sites) was linked to the hacker's identity on Anonymous.[21] Kernell attempted to conceal his identity by using the anonymous proxy service ctunnel.com, but, because of the illegal nature of the access, ctunnel website administrator Gabriel Ramuglia assisted the FBI in tracking down the source of the hack.[22]

BNP membership list

After briefly appearing on a blog, the membership list of the far-right British National Party was posted to WikiLeaks on 18 November 2008. The name, address, age and occupation of many of the 13,500 members were given, including several police officers, two solicitors, four ministers of religion, at least one doctor, and a number of primary and secondary school teachers. In Britain, police officers are banned from joining or promoting the BNP, and at least one officer was dismissed for being a member.[23] The BNP was known for going to considerable lengths to conceal the identities of members. On 19 November, BNP leader Nick Griffin stated that he knew the identity of the person who initially leaked the list on 17 November, describing him as a "hardliner" senior employee who left the party in 2007.[24][25][26] On 20 October 2009, a list of BNP members from April 2009 was leaked. This list contained 11,811 members.[27]

2009

In January 2009, over 600 internal United Nations reports (60 of them marked "strictly confidential") were leaked.[28]

On 7 February 2009, WikiLeaks released 6,780 Congressional Research Service reports.[29]

In March 2009, WikiLeaks published a list of contributors to the Norm Coleman senatorial campaign[30] and a set of documents belonging to Barclays Bank that had been ordered removed from the website of The Guardian.[31]

Climategate emails


In November 2009, controversial documents, including e-mail correspondence between climate scientists, were released (allegedly after being illegally obtained) from the University of East Anglia's (UEA) Climatic Research Unit (CRU).[32] According to the university, the emails and documents were obtained through a server hacking; one prominent host of the full 120 MB archive was WikiLeaks.[33][34]

Internet censorship lists

WikiLeaks has published the lists of forbidden or illegal web addresses for several countries.

On 19 March 2009, WikiLeaks published what was alleged to be the Australian Communications and Media Authority's blacklist of sites to be banned under Australia's proposed laws on Internet censorship.[35] Reactions to the publication of the list by the Australian media and politicians were varied. Particular note was made by journalistic outlets of the type of websites on the list; while the Internet censorship scheme submitted by the Australian Labor Party in 2008 was proposed with the stated intention of preventing access to child pornography and sites related to terrorism,[36] the list leaked on WikiLeaks contains a number of sites unrelated to sex crimes involving minors.[37][38] When questioned about the leak, Stephen Conroy, the Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy in Australia's Rudd Labor Government, responded by claiming that the list was not the actual list, yet threatening to prosecute anyone involved in distributing it.[39] On 20 March 2009, WikiLeaks published an updated list, dated 18 March 2009; it more closely matches the claimed size of the ACMA blacklist, and contains two pages which have been independently confirmed to be blacklisted by ACMA.

WikiLeaks also contains details of Internet censorship in Thailand, including lists of censored sites dating back to May 2006.[40]

Bilderberg Group meeting reports

Since May 2009, WikiLeaks has made available reports of several meetings of the Bilderberg Group.[41] It includes the group's history[42] and meeting reports from the years 1955, 1956, 1957, 1958, 1960, 1962, 1963 and 1980.

2008 Peru oil scandal

On 28 January 2009, WikiLeaks released 86 telephone intercept recordings of Peruvian politicians and businessmen involved in the "Petrogate" oil scandal. The release of the tapes led the front pages of five Peruvian newspapers.[43]

Nuclear accident in Iran

On 16 July 2009, Iranian news agencies reported that the head of Iran's atomic energy organization Gholam Reza Aghazadeh had abruptly resigned for unknown reasons after twelve years in office.[44] Shortly afterwards WikiLeaks released a report disclosing a "serious nuclear accident" at the Iranian Natanz nuclear facility in 2009.[45] The Federation of American Scientists (FAS) released statistics according to which the number of enriched centrifuges operational in Iran mysteriously declined from about 4,700 to about 3,900 beginning around the time the nuclear incident WikiLeaks mentioned would have occurred.[46][47]

According to media reports the accident may have been the direct result of a cyberattack at Iran's nuclear program, carried out with the Stuxnet computer worm.[48][49]

Toxic dumping in Africa: The Minton report

In September 2006, commodities giant Trafigura commissioned an internal report about a toxic dumping incident in the Ivory Coast,[50] which (according to the United Nations) affected 108,000 people. The document, called the Minton Report, names various harmful chemicals "likely to be present" in the waste â€” sodium hydroxide, cobalt phthalocyanine sulfonate, coker naphtha, thiols, sodium alkanethiolate, sodium hydrosulfide, sodium sulfide, dialkyl disulfides, hydrogen sulfide â€” and notes that some of them "may cause harm at some distance". The report states that potential health effects include "burns to the skin, eyes and lungs, vomiting, diarrhea, loss of consciousness and death", and suggests that the high number of reported casualties is "consistent with there having been a significant release of hydrogen sulphide gas".

On 11 September 2009, Trafigura's lawyers, Carter-Ruck, obtained a secret "super-injunction"[51] against The Guardian, banning that newspaper from publishing the contents of the document. Trafigura also threatened a number of other media organizations with legal action if they published the report's contents, including the Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation[50] and The Chemical Engineer magazine.[52] On 14 September 2009, WikiLeaks posted the report.[53]

On 12 October, Carter-Ruck warned The Guardian against mentioning the content of a parliamentary question that was due to be asked about the report. Instead, the paper published an article stating that they were unable to report on an unspecified question and claiming that the situation appeared to "call into question privileges guaranteeing free speech established under the 1689 Bill of Rights".[54] The suppressed details rapidly circulated via the internet and Twitter[55][56][57] and, amid uproar, Carter-Ruck agreed the next day to the modification of the injunction before it was challenged in court, permitting The Guardian to reveal the existence of the question and the injunction.[58] The injunction was lifted on 16 October.[59]

Kaupthing Bank

WikiLeaks has made available an internal document[60] from Kaupthing Bank from just prior to the collapse of Iceland's banking sector, which led to the 2008–2009 Icelandic financial crisis. The document shows that suspiciously large sums of money were loaned to various owners of the bank, and large debts written off. Kaupthing's lawyers have threatened WikiLeaks with legal action, citing banking privacy laws. The leak has caused an uproar in Iceland.[61] Criminal charges relating to the multibillion euro loans to Exista and other major shareholders are being investigated. The bank is seeking to recover loans taken out by former bank employees before its collapse.[62]

Joint Services Protocol 440

Joint Services Protocol 440 ("JSP 440") is the name of a British 2001 Ministry of Defense 2,400-page restricted document for security containing instructions for avoiding leaks in the information flow caused by hackers, journalists, and foreign spies.[63][64] The protocol was posted on WikiLeaks on 3 October 2009.

9/11 pager messages

On 25 November 2009, WikiLeaks released 570,000 intercepts of pager messages sent on the day of the 11 September attacks.[65][66][67] Bradley Manning (see below) commented that those were obvious NSA intercepts.[68] Among the released messages are communications between Pentagon officials and New York City Police Department.[69]

2010

U.S. Intelligence report on WikiLeaks

On 15 March 2010, WikiLeaks released a secret 32-page U.S. Department of Defense Counterintelligence Analysis Report from March 2008. The document described some prominent reports leaked on the website which related to U.S. security interests and described potential methods of marginalizing the organization. WikiLeaks editor Julian Assange said that some details in the Army report were inaccurate and its recommendations flawed,[70] and also that the concerns of the U.S. Army raised by the report were hypothetical.[71] The report discussed deterring potential whistleblowers via termination of employment and criminal prosecution of any existing or former insiders, leakers or whistleblowers. Reasons for the report include notable leaks such as U.S. equipment expenditure, human rights violations in Guantanamo Bay and the battle over the Iraqi town of Fallujah.[72]

Baghdad airstrike video


On 5 April 2010, WikiLeaks released classified U.S. military footage from a series of attacks on 12 July 2007 in Baghdad by a U.S. helicopter that killed 12, including two Reuters news staff, Saeed Chmagh and Namir Noor-Eldeen, on a website called "Collateral Murder". The footage consisted of a 39-minute unedited version and an 18-minute version which had been edited and annotated. Analysis of the video indicates that the pilots thought the men were carrying weapons (which were actually camera equipment). When asked if they were sure that the men were carrying weapons, they answered in the affirmative.[73] The military conducted an "informal" investigation into the incident, but has yet to release the investigative materials (such as the sworn statements of the soldiers involved or the battle damage assessment) that were used, causing the report to be criticized as "sloppy."[74]

In the week following the release, "Wikileaks" was the search term with the most significant growth worldwide in the last seven days as measured by Google Insights.[75]

Arrest of Bradley Manning
Main article: Bradley Manning

A 22-year-old US Army intelligence analyst, PFC (formerly SPC) Bradley Manning, was arrested after alleged chat logs were turned in to the authorities by former hacker Adrian Lamo, in whom he had confided. Manning reportedly told Lamo he had leaked the "Collateral Murder" video, in addition to a video of the Granai airstrike and around 260,000 diplomatic cables, to WikiLeaks.[76][77] WikiLeaks said "allegations in Wired that we have been sent 260,000 classified US embassy cables are, as far as we can tell, incorrect."[78] WikiLeaks have said that they are unable as yet to confirm whether or not Manning was actually the source of the video, stating "we never collect personal information on our sources", but that they have nonetheless "taken steps to arrange for his protection and legal defence."[77][79] On 21 June Julian Assange told The Guardian that WikiLeaks had hired three US criminal lawyers to defend Manning but that they had not been given access to him.[80]

Manning reportedly wrote, "Everywhere there’s a U.S. post, there’s a diplomatic scandal that will be revealed."[81] According to the Washington Post, he also described the cables as "explaining how the first world exploits the third, in detail, from an internal perspective."[82]

Afghan War Diary

On 25 July 2010,[83] WikiLeaks released to The Guardian, The New York Times, and Der Spiegel over 92,000 documents related to the war in Afghanistan between 2004 and the end of 2009. The documents detail individual incidents including friendly fire and civilian casualties.[84] The scale of leak was described by Julian Assange as comparable to that of the Pentagon Papers in the 1970s. The documents were released to the public on 25 July 2010. On 29 July 2010 WikiLeaks added a 1.4 GB "insurance file" to the Afghan War Diary page, whose decryption details would be release if WikiLeaks or Assange were harmed.[85][86][87]

About 15,000 of the 92,000 documents have not yet been released on WikiLeaks, as the group is currently reviewing the documents to remove some of the sources of the information. Speaking to a group in London in August 2010, Assange said that the group will "absolutely" release the remaining documents. He stated that WikiLeaks has requested help from the Pentagon and human-rights groups to help redact the names, but has not received any assistance. He also stated that WikiLeaks is "not obligated to protect other people's sources...unless it is from unjust retribution."[88]

According to a report on the Daily Beast website, the Obama administration has asked Britain, Germany and Australia among others to consider bringing criminal charges against Assange for the Afghan war leaks and to help limit Assange's travels across international borders.[89] In the United States, a joint investigation by the Army and the Federal Bureau of Investigation may try to prosecute "Mr. Assange and others involved on grounds they encouraged the theft of government property".[90]

The Australia Defence Association (ADA) stated that WikiLeaks' Julian Assange "could have committed a serious criminal offence in helping an enemy of the Australian Defence Force (ADF)."[91] Neil James, the executive director of ADA, states: "Put bluntly, Wikileaks is not authorised in international or Australian law, nor equipped morally or operationally, to judge whether open publication of such material risks the safety, security, morale and legitimate objectives of Australian and allied troops fighting in a UN-endorsed military operation."[91]

WikiLeaks' recent leaking of classified U.S. intelligence has been described by commentator of The Wall Street Journal as having "endangered the lives of Afghan informants" and "the dozens of Afghan civilians named in the document dump as U.S. military informants. Their lives, as well as those of their entire families, are now at terrible risk of Taliban reprisal."[92] When interviewed, Assange stated that WikiLeaks has withheld some 15,000 documents that identify informants to avoid putting their lives at risk. Specifically, Voice of America reported in August 2010 that Assange, responding to such criticisms, stated that the 15,000 still held documents are being reviewed "line by line," and that the names of "innocent parties who are under reasonable threat" will be removed.[93] Greg Gutfeld of Fox News described the leaking as "WikiLeaks' Crusade Against the U.S. Military."[94] John Pilger has reported that prior to the release of the Afghan War Diaries in July, WikiLeaks contacted the White House in writing, asking that it identify names that might draw reprisals, but received no response.[95][96]

According to the New York Times, Amnesty International and Reporters Without Borders criticized WikiLeaks for what they saw as risking people’s lives by identifying Afghans acting as informers.[97] A Taliban spokesman said that the Taliban had formed a nine-member "commission" to review the documents "to find about people who are spying."[97] He said the Taliban had a "wanted" list of 1,800 Afghans and was comparing that with names WikiLeaks provided, stating "after the process is completed, our Taliban court will decide about such people."[97]

Love Parade documents

Sometime after the Love Parade stampede in Duisburg, Germany on 24 July 2010, the local news blog Xtranews published internal documents of the city administration regarding Love Parade planning and actions by the authorities. The city government reacted by acquiring a court order on 16 August forcing Xtranews to remove the documents from its blog.[98] Two days later, however, after the documents had surfaced on other websites as well, the government stated that it would not conduct any further legal actions against the publication of the documents.[99] On 20 August WikiLeaks released a publication titled Loveparade 2010 Duisburg planning documents, 2007–2010, which comprised 43 internal documents regarding the Love Parade 2010.[100][101]

Iraq War Logs

In October 2010, it was reported that WikiLeaks was planning to release up to 400,000 documents relating to the Iraq War.[102] Julian Assange initially denied the reports, stating: "WikiLeaks does not speak about upcoming releases dates, indeed, with very rare exceptions we do not communicate any specific information about upcoming releases, since that simply provides fodder for abusive organizations to get their spin machines ready."[103] The Guardian reported on 21 October 2010 that it had received almost 400,000 Iraq war documents from WikiLeaks.[104] On 22 October 2010, Al Jazeera was the first to release analyses of the leak, dubbed The War Logs. WikiLeaks posted a tweet that "Al Jazeera have broken our embargo by 30 minutes. We release everyone from their Iraq War Logs embargoes." This prompted other news organizations to release their articles based on the source material. The release of the documents coincided with a return of the main wikileaks.org website, which had been offering no content since 30 September 2010.

The BBC quoted the Pentagon referring to the Iraq War Logs as "the largest leak of classified documents in its history." Media coverage of the leaked documents focused on claims that the U.S. government had ignored reports of torture by the Iraqi authorities during the period after the 2003 war.[105]

Diplomatic cables release

Template:Wikinewshas On 22 November 2010 an announcement was made by the WikiLeaks twitter feed that the next release would be "7x the size of the Iraq War Logs."[106][107] U.S. authorities and the media have speculated that they may contain diplomatic cables.[108] Prior to the expected leak, the government of the United Kingdom (UK) sent a DA-Notice to UK newspapers, which requests advance notice from the newspapers regarding the expected publication.[109] According to Index on Censorship, "there is no obligation on media to comply". "Newspaper editors would speak to [the] Defence, Press and Broadcasting Advisory Committee prior to publication."[109] The Pakistani newspaper Dawn stated that the U.S. newspapers The New York Times and The Washington Post were expected to publish parts of the diplomatic cables on Sunday 28 November, including 94 Pakistan-related documents.[110]

On 26 November, via his lawyer Jennifer Robinson, Assange sent a letter to the US Department of State, asking for information regarding people who could be placed at "significant risk of harm" by the diplomatic cables release.[111][112] Harold Koh, Legal Adviser of the Department of State, refused the proposal, stating, "We will not engage in a negotiation regarding the further release or dissemination of illegally obtained U.S. Government classified materials."[112]

On 28 November, WikiLeaks announced it was undergoing a massive Distributed Denial-of-service attack,[113] but vowed to still leak the cables and documents via prominent media outlets including El País, Le Monde, Der Spiegel, The Guardian, and The New York Times.[114] The announcement was shortly thereafter followed by the online publication, by The Guardian, of some of the purported diplomatic cables including one in which United States Secretary of State Hillary Clinton apparently orders diplomats to obtain credit card and frequent flier numbers of the French, British, Russian and Chinese delegations to the United Nations Security Council.[115] Other revelations reportedly include that several Arab nations urged the U.S. to launch a first strike on Iran, that the Chinese government was directly involved in computer hacking, and that the U.S. is pressuring Pakistan to turn over nuclear material to prevent it from falling into the wrong hands. The cables also include unflattering appraisals of world leaders.[116] U.S. congressman Peter T. King called for WikiLeaks to be designated as a terrorist organization in response to the leak of the cables.[117]

On 2 Dec 2010 EveryDNS dropped WikiLeaks from its entries, citing DDoS attacks that "threatened the stability of its infrastructure".[118] The site's .info DNS lookup remained operational (alternatives: www.wikileaks.ch www.wikileaks.pl www.wikileaks.fi wikileaks.dataleech.com), and listed IP address 213.251.145.96 for direct access respectively to the Wikileaks and Cablegate websites.[119] Amazon.com also severed its ties with WikiLeaks, to which it was providing infrastructure services, after an intervention of an aide of US Senator Joseph Lieberman.[120][121][122] Lieberman, who later praised Amazon's decision and called for other companies to follow suit,[122] also proposed new legislation targeting similar cases—Securing Human Intelligence and Enforcing Lawful Dissemination Act,[121] also known as the the SHIELD Act.[123]

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton responded to the leaks saying, "This disclosure is not just an attack on America's foreign policy; it is an attack on the international community, the alliances and partnerships, the conventions and negotiations that safeguard global security and advance economic prosperity." Julian Assange is quoted as saying, "Of course, abusive, Titanic organizations, when exposed, grasp at all sorts of ridiculous straws to try and distract the public from the true nature of the abuse."[124] John Perry Barlow, co-founder of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, wrote a tweet saying: "The first serious infowar is now engaged. The field of battle is WikiLeaks. You are the troops."[125]

WikiLeaks and their media partners has started to voluntary censorship cables. Content of 10STATE17263 cable was removed from site for more 24 hours, then appeared back as 1 paragraph instead of original. 07STATE164120 cable was already removed for 12 hours, then appeared back with name of Russian opposition figure Vladirmir Ryzhkov in subject removed. On December 3 WikiLeaks has suspended to provide hourly updates with torrents.

Announcements on upcoming leaks

In May 2010, WikiLeaks said they had video footage of a massacre of civilians in Afghanistan by the U.S. military which they were preparing to release.[126][127]

In an interview with Chris Anderson on 19 July 2010, Assange showed a document WikiLeaks had on an Albanian oil well blowout, and said they also had material from inside BP,[128] and that they were "getting enormous quantity of whistle-blower disclosures of a very high caliber"[129] but added that they have not been able to verify and release the material because they do not have enough volunteer journalists.[130]

In October 2010, Assange told a leading Moscow newspaper that "The Kremlin had better brace itself for a coming wave of WikiLeaks disclosures about Russia."[131][132] Assange later clarified: "we have material on many businesses and governments, including in Russia. It’s not right to say there’s going to be a particular focus on Russia".[133]

In a 2009 Computer World interview, Assange claimed to be in possession of "5GB from Bank of America", and in 2010 told Forbes magazine that WikiLeaks was planning another "megaleak" for early in 2011, which this time would be from inside the private sector and involve "a big U.S. bank". Bank of America's stock price fell as a result of this announcement.[134][135][136]

See also

Template:Portal box Template:div col

Template:div col end

References

  1. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Khatchdourian
  2. Rice, Xan (31 August 2007). "The looting of Kenya". The Guardian (London). http://www.guardian.co.uk/kenya/story/0,,2159757,00.html. Retrieved 28 February 2008. </li>
  3. 3.0 3.1 Template:cite press release
  4. Bank Julius Baer & Co. Ltd. et al. v. Wikileaks et al. News.justia.com. URL accessed on 13 March 2009.
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 Judge reverses Wikileaks injunction. The Inquirer. URL accessed on 23 September 2009.
  6. Philipp Gollner (29 February 2008). "Judge reverses ruling in Julius Baer leak case". Reuters. http://www.reuters.com/article/internetNews/idUSN2927431720080229. Retrieved 1 March 2008. </li>
  7. Claburn, Thomas Swiss Bank Abandons Lawsuit Against WikiLeaks: The wiki had posted financial documents it said proved tax evasion by Bank Julius Baer's clients. InformationWeek.
  8. "Sensitive Guantánamo Bay Manual Leaked Through Wiki Site", Wired 14 November 2007
  9. specific address at The Guardian.
  10. "Guantanamo operating manual posted on Internet". Reuters. 15 November 2007. http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN1424207020071114?pageNumber=1. Retrieved 15 November 2007. </li>
  11. Camp Delta Operating Procedure (2004). WikiLeaks. Archived from source 3 April 2008. URL accessed on 13 March 2009.
  12. Changes in Guantanamo SOP manual (2003–2004). WikiLeaks. Archived from source 4 April 2008. URL accessed on 13 March 2009.
  13. Church of Scientology collected Operating Thetan Documents, including full text of legal letter..Template:dead link
  14. Church of Scientology warns WikiLeaks over documents.
  15. See the article "Anonymous (Group)"
  16. Group Posts E-Mail Hacked From Palin Account â€“ Update. Wired.
  17. Shear, Michael D.; Karl Vick (18 September 2008). "Hackers Access Palin's Personal E-Mail, Post Some Online". The Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/17/AR2008091703304.html?hpid=topnews. Retrieved 18 September 2008. </li>
  18. "FBI, Secret Service Investigate Hacking of Palin’s E-mail". Fox News. 18 September 2008. http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/09/18/palins-e-mail-hacked/. Retrieved 18 September 2008. </li>
  19. Swaine, Jon (18 September 2008). "Sarah Palin's email account broken into by hackers". The Daily Telegraph (London). http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/uselection2008/sarahpalin/2980391/Sarah-Palins-email-account-broken-into-by-hackers.html. Retrieved 18 September 2008. </li>
  20. Federal Bureau of Investigation â€“ Knoxville Division â€“ Press Releases â€“ Department of Justice. Knoxville.fbi.gov. URL accessed on 16 November 2009.
  21. Palin Email Hacker Found. Slashdot. URL accessed on 21 September 2008.
  22. Memo to US Secret Service: Net proxy may pinpoint Palin email hackers. TheRegister. URL accessed on 21 September 2008.
  23. "'BNP membership' officer sacked". BBC. 21 March 2009. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/merseyside/7956824.stm. Retrieved 23 March 2009. </li>
  24. Cobain, Ian (19 November 2008). "BNP membership list posted online by former 'hardliner'". The Guardian (London). http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/nov/19/bnp-list. Retrieved 19 November 2008. </li>
  25. BNP Membership List Exposed. Infoshop News. URL accessed on 19 November 2008.
  26. Lea, Michael; Boden, Nicola (19 November 2008). "Police officer faces investigation after being 'outed' as BNP supporter in membership leak". London: DailyMail. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1087101/Police-officer-faces-investigation-outed-BNP-supporter-membership-leak.html. Retrieved 19 November 2008. </li>
  27. Booth, Robert (20 October 2009). "BNP membership list leaked". Guardian (London). http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/oct/20/bnp-membership-list-wikileaks. Retrieved 20 October 2009. </li>
  28. Radio, Britannia Britannia Radio. Britanniaradio.blogspot.com. URL accessed on 13 March 2009.
  29. Change you can download: a billion in secret Congressional reports. WikiLeaks. URL accessed on 13 March 2009. Template:Dead link
  30. The Big Bad Database of Senator Norm Coleman. URL accessed on 17 June 2010. Template:Dead link
  31. Barclays Bank gags Guardian over leaked memos detailing offshore tax scam. WikiLeaks. URL accessed on 17 June 2010. Template:Dead link
  32. Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change. Government Response to the House of Commons Science and Technology 8th Report of Session 2009–10: The disclosure of climate date from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, The Stationery Office.
  33. "WikiLeaks.org aims to expose lies, topple governments". New York Post. 29 November 2009. http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/wikileaks_org_aims_to_expose_lies_flsLqNMO3B0LEtxL5bNaKL. </li>
  34. Moses, Asher (2 February 2010). "Wikileaks shuts down, unable to plug funding gap (Sydney Morning Herald)". Sydney Morning Herald. http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/wikileaks-shuts-down-unable-to-plug-funding-gap-20100202-n9z4.html. Retrieved 30 April 2010. </li>
  35. Colin Jacobs. Leaked Government blacklist confirms worst fears. Electronic Frontiers Australia. URL accessed on 19 March 2009.
  36. Vivian Wai-yin Kwok (19 March 2009). "Aussie Internet Blacklist Has Gray Areas". Forbes. http://www.forbes.com/2009/03/19/australia-internet-censorship-markets-economy-wikileaks.html. Retrieved 19 March 2009. </li>
  37. Asher Moses (19 March 2009). "Leaked Australian blacklist reveals banned sites". Sydney Morning Herald. http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2009/03/19/1237054961100.html. Retrieved 19 March 2009. </li>
  38. Liam Tung (19 March 2009). "Wikileaks spills ACMA blacklist". ZD Net Australia. http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/security/soa/Wikileaks-spills-ACMA-blacklist/0,130061744,339295538,00.htm. Retrieved 19 March 2009. </li>
  39. Nic MacBean (19 March 2009). "Leaked blacklist irresponsible, inaccurate: Conroy". ABC News. http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/03/19/2520929.htm?section=australia. Retrieved 19 March 2009. ""I am aware of reports that a list of URLs has been placed on a website. This is not the ACMA blacklist." He says that the published list purports to be current on 6 August 2008, and contains approximately 2,400 URLs, whereas the ACMA blacklist for the same date contained 1,061 URLs. "There are some common URLs to those on the ACMA blacklist. However, ACMA advises that there are URLs on the published list that have never been the subject of a complaint or ACMA investigation, and have never been included on the ACMA blacklist," he said. "ACMA is investigating this matter and is considering a range of possible actions it may take including referral to the Australian Federal Police. Any Australian involved in making this content publicly available would be at serious risk of criminal prosecution."" </li>
  40. Internet Censorship in Thailand. wikileaks.org. Archived from source 16 January 2008. URL accessed on 17 June 2010.
  41. Bildeberg Group Documents. WikiLeaks. URL accessed on 11 May 2009. Template:Dead link
  42. Bilderberg Group History, 1956. WikiLeaks. URL accessed on 11 May 2009. Template:Dead link
  43. 86 interceptaciones telefonicas a politicos y autoridades peruanos, más del caso Petrogate, 2008. WikiLeaks. URL accessed on 16 November 2009. Template:Dead link
  44. "Iranian nuclear chief steps down". BBC News. 16 July 2009. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8153775.stm. Retrieved 16 October 2010. </li>
  45. Serious nuclear accident may lay behind Iranian nuke chief's mystery resignation. wikileaks. URL accessed on 16 October 2010.
  46. German Cyber-Security Expert: Stuxnet's Target, Natanz Reactor. www.richardsilverstein.com. URL accessed on 2 October 2010.
  47. Clayton, Mark Stuxnet worm mystery: What's the cyber weapon after?. Yahoo News. URL accessed on 28 September 2010. Template:Dead link
  48. 6 mysteries about Stuxnet. Blog.foreignpolicy.com. URL accessed on 28 September 2010.
  49. Paul Woodward. Iran confirms Stuxnet found at Bushehr nuclear power plant. Warincontext.org. URL accessed on 28 September 2010.
  50. 50.0 50.1 "A gag too far". Index On Censorship. October 2009. http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2009/10/a-gag-too-far/. Retrieved 14 October 2009.Template:dead link </li>
  51. Template:citeTemplate:dead link
  52. Duckett, Adam (13 October 2009). "Trafigura story breaks". The Chemical Engineer. http://www.tcetoday.com/trafigura. Retrieved 2 December 2010. </li>
  53. RE: Caustic Tank Washings, Abidjan, Ivory Coast. URL accessed on 16 October 2009. Template:Dead link
  54. Leigh, David (12 October 2009). Guardian gagged from reporting parliament. The Guardian.
  55. Rusbridger, Alan (14 October 2009). The Trafigura fiasco tears up the textbook. The Guardian.
  56. Higham, Nick (13 October 2009). When is a secret not a secret? BBC News.
  57. The mysterious British House of Commons. Wikipedia Reference Desk
  58. Leigh, David (13 October 2009). "Gag on Guardian reporting MP's Trafigura question lifted". The Guardian (London). http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/oct/13/guardian-gagged-parliamentary-question. Retrieved 14 October 2009. </li>
  59. Beckford, Martin (16 October 2009). "Secret Trafigura report said ‘likely cause’ of illness was release of toxic gas from dumped waste". The Daily Telegraph (London). http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/6350262/Secret-Trafigura-report-said-likely-cause-of-illness-was-release-of-toxic-gas-from-dumped-waste.html. Retrieved 16 October 2009. </li>
  60. Financial collapse: Confidential exposure analysis of 205 companies each owing above €45M to Icelandic bank Kaupthing, 26 September 2008. WikiLeaks. URL accessed on 22 September 2009.
  61. Miklar hreyfingar rétt fyrir hrun. RÚV. URL accessed on 22 September 2009.
  62. "Failed Icelandic bank seeks 197 million euros from former staff". AFP. 17 May 2010. http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jRXbUVXZXzphjcFfhmcjSq_E262A. </li>
  63. Tom Chivers. "MoD 'how to stop leaks' document is leaked" The Daily Telegraph 5 October 2009. Retrieved 6 October 2009.
  64. Kalle Holmberg. "Brittisk instruktion mot läckor har läckt ut" Dagens Nyheter, 6 October 2009. Retrieved 6 October 2009.
  65. Wikileaks 9/11 Pager Data Website. 911.wikileaks.org. URL accessed on 2010-12-02.
  66. 570,000 pager messages from 9/11 released MSNBC 25 November 2009. MSNBC. URL accessed on 30 April 2010.
  67. Jennifer Millman. Analysis of 9/11 Pager Data Paints Chilling Picture. NBC New York.
  68. Chris Williams. Wikileaks' US army 'leaker' arrested. TheRegister.
  69. Kevin Poulsen. Wikileaks Says It Has Half-a-Million 9/11 Pager Messages. Wired.
  70. Mccullagh, Declan U.S. Army worried about Wikileaks in secret report. CNET News, CBS Interactive. URL accessed on 15 March 2010.
  71. Strom, Stephanie (17 March 2010). "Pentagon Sees a Threat From Online Muckrakers". nytimes. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/18/us/18wiki.html. Retrieved 30 April 2010. </li>
  72. U.S. Intelligence planned to destroy WikiLeaks. (PDF)Template:dead link
  73. "Video Shows U.S. Killing of Reuters Employees". New York Times author=Elisabeth Bumiller; Brian Stelter. 6 April 2009. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/06/world/middleeast/06baghdad.html. Retrieved 7 April 2010. </li>
  74. Khatchadourian, Raffi (9 April 2010) The WikiLeaks Video: Reading the Report, The New Yorker
  75. Current Google Insights trends: Wikileaks posts classified military video, Masters, The Independent, (12 April 2010)
  76. Poulsen, Kevin; Zetter, Kim (6 June 2010). "U.S. Intelligence Analyst Arrested in Wikileaks Video Probe". Wired. http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/06/leak/. Retrieved 15 June 2010. </li>
  77. 77.0 77.1 "US intelligence analyst arrested over security leaks". BBC News. 7 June 2010. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/asia_pacific/10254072.stm. Retrieved 15 June 2010. </li>
  78. Fildes, Jonathan (7 June 2010). "Hacker explains why he reported 'Wikileaks source'". BBC News. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/10255887.stm. Retrieved 15 June 2010. </li>
  79. Fildes, Jonathan (8 June 2010). "Wikileaks site unfazed by arrest of U.S. army 'source'". BBC News. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/10265430.stm. Retrieved 15 June 2010. </li>
  80. Traynor, Ian (21 June 2010). "WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange breaks cover but will avoid America". guardian.co.uk (London). http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/jun/21/wikileaks-founder-julian-assange-breaks-cover. Retrieved 21 June 2010. </li>
  81. Kevin Poulsen and Kim Zetter (6 June 2010). "U.S. Intelligence Analyst Arrested in Wikileaks Video Probe". Wired. http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/06/leak/. </li>
  82. Ellen Nakashima (10 June 2010). "Messages from alleged leaker Bradley Manning portray him as despondent soldier". The Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/09/AR2010060906170.html. </li>
  83. Birmingham, John (1 October 2010). "The Man Who Fell to Earth". The Monthly. http://www.themonthly.com.au/monthly-essays-john-birmingham-man-who-fell-earth-julian-assange-s-wikileaks-2789. Retrieved 25 October 2010. </li>
  84. "Afghanistan war logs: the unvarnished picture". guardian.co.uk (London). 25 July 2010. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/jul/25/afghanistan-war-logs-guardian-editorial?intcmp=239. Retrieved 26 July 2010. </li>
  85. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named wired_insurance
  86. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named telegraph_dns_insuranceaes
  87. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named cbsnews_diplomaticbomb
  88. Julian E. Barnes; Jeanne Whalen (12 August 2010). "Pentagon Slams WikiLeaks' Plan to Post More War Logs". The Wall Street Journal. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704407804575425900461793766.html?mod=WSJ_article_LatestHeadlines#articleTabs%3Darticle. Retrieved 13 August 2010. </li>
  89. Shenon, Philip U.S. Urges Allies to Crack Down on WikiLeaks. The Daily Beast. URL accessed on 10 August 2010.
  90. Entous, Adam; Perez, Evan; ADAM ENTOUS, EVAN PEREZ. "Prosecutors Eye WikiLeaks Charges". The Wall Street Journal date=20 August 2010. http://online.wsj.com/article/NA_WSJ_PUB:SB10001424052748704488404575441673460880204.html. Retrieved 21 August 2010. </li>
  91. 91.0 91.1 "Assange may have committed offence: ADA". The Sydney Morning Herald. 28 July 2010. http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-national/assange-may-have-committed-offence-ada-20100728-10vp8.html. </li>
  92. "WikiLeaks 'Bastards'". The Wall Street Journal date=29 July 2010. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703940904575395500694117006.html?mod=googlenews_wsj#articleTabs%3Darticle. </li>
  93. Sweden Withdraws Arrest Warrant for Embattled WikiLeaks Founder. .voanews.com. URL accessed on 22 October 2010.
  94. "WikiLeaks' Crusade Against the U.S. Military". Fox News. 28 July 2010. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,597965,00.html. </li>
  95. Why Wikileaks Must Be Protected. Zcommunications.org. URL accessed on 22 October 2010.
  96. WikiLeaks and Pentagon Disagree About Talks 19 August 2010
  97. 97.0 97.1 97.2 Burns, John (23 October 2010). "WikiLeaks Founder on the Run, Trailed by Notoriety". The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/24/world/24assange.html?_r=2. Retrieved 28 October 2010. </li>
  98. Konrad Lischka: Einstweilige Verfügung – Duisburg verbietet Blogger-Veröffentlichung zur Love Parade at Spiegel Online on 18 August 2010 (German)
  99. Loveparade-Dokumente offen im Internet at wdr.de (German. Retrieved 26 August 2010.
  100. Loveparade 2010 Duisburg planning documents, 2007–2010. URL accessed on 21 August 2010. Template:Dead link
  101. WikiLeaks releases documents on Love Parade tragedy at news.com.au on 21 August 2010
  102. "WikiLeaks May Release 400,000 Iraq War Documents". CBS News. 16 October 2010. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/10/16/national/main6964276.shtml. Retrieved 16 October 2010. </li>
  103. Assange, Julian (18 October 2010). "Where do all these claims about WikiLeaks doing something on Iraq today (Monday) come from?". WikiLeaks. http://www.twitlonger.com/show/6hqu1n. Retrieved 18 October 2010. </li>
  104. "Iraq war logs: secret files show how US ignored torture". The Guardian (UK). 22 October 2010. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/oct/22/iraq-war-logs-military-leaks. Retrieved 22 October 2010. </li>
  105. "Huge Wikileaks release shows US 'ignored Iraq torture'". BBC News. 23 October 2010. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-11611319. Retrieved 23 October 2010. </li>
  106. http://twitter.com/#!/wikileaks/status/6564225640042499
  107. Andrea Petrou. WikiLeaks promises leak "seven times bigger than Iraq".
  108. Telegraph: WikiLeaks to release three million secret U.S. documents – FOCUS Information Agency. Focus-fen.net. URL accessed on 29 November 2010.
  109. 109.0 109.1 Butselaar, Emily Wikileaks: UK issues DA-Notice as U.S. briefs allies on fresh leak. Index on Censorship. URL accessed on 26 November 2010.Template:dead link
  110. "WikiLeaks plans to release 94 papers about Pakistan". Dawn. 27 November 2010. Archived from the original on 26 November 2010. http://www.webcitation.org/5uXW29Chj. Retrieved 27 November 2010. </li>
  111. "US rejects talks with WikiLeaks". Sydney Morning Herald /AFP. 28 November 2010. Archived from the original on 28 November 2010. http://www.webcitation.org/5uZqzdckM. Retrieved 28 November 2010. </li>
  112. 112.0 112.1 Koh, Harold Hongju Dear Ms. Robinson and Mr. Assange. (PDF) The Washington Post. Archived from source 28 November 2010. URL accessed on 28 November 2010.
  113. "Wikileaks 'hacked ahead of secret US document release'". BBC News. 28 November 2010. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-11858637. Retrieved 28 November 2010. </li>
  114. Twitter / WikiLeaks: El Pais, Le Monde, Speigel. Twitter. URL accessed on 29 November 2010.
  115. Robert Booth and Julian Borger. US diplomats spied on UN leadership. The Guardian. URL accessed on 29 November 2010.
  116. Helen Kennedy. "WikiLeaks should be designated a 'foreign terrorist organization,' Rep. Pete King fumes". New York Daily News date=29 November 2010. http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/2010/11/28/2010-11-28_media_unveils_classified_documents_via_wikileaks_website_in_explosive_release_of.html. </li>
  117. Cole, Rob (29 November 2010). "WikiLeaks 'Should Be A Terror Organisation'". Sky News. http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/World-News/WikiLeaks-Republican-Peter-King-Says-WikiLeaks-Should-Be-Designated-A-Terrorist-Organisation/Article/201011415837684?lpos=World_News_First_Home_Article_Teaser_Region_0&lid=ARTICLE_15837684_WikiLeaks%3A_Republican_Peter_King_Says_WikiLeaks_Should_Be_Designated_A_Terrorist_Organisation. Retrieved 29 November 2010. </li>
  118. RAPHAEL G. SATTER and MALIN RISING (3 Dec 2010) WikiLeaks dropped by domain name provider, an Associated Press story syndicated by The Charlotte Observer
  119. Darren Pauli. WikiLeaks loses domain name after DoS attacks. ZDNet.
  120. RAVI SOMAIYA and ALAN COWELL (December 3, 2010), WikiLeaks Struggles to Stay Online After Cyberattacks, The New York Times
  121. 121.0 121.1 Dylan Welch (December 4, 2010) Attacks shut down WikiLeaks, The Age
  122. 122.0 122.1 Ewen MacAskill (2 December 2010) WikiLeaks website pulled by Amazon after US political pressure, The Guardian
  123. Kevin Poulsen (December 2, 2010) Lieberman Introduces Anti-WikiLeaks Legislation, Wired.com
  124. "Clinton condemns leak as 'attack on international community'". CNN. 29 November 2010. http://edition.cnn.com/2010/US/11/29/wikileaks/index.html. </li>
  125. By RAPHAEL G. SATTER and PETER SVENSSON (December 3, 2010) WikiLeaks fights to stay online amid attacks, an Associated Press report syndicated by The Washington Post
  126. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named campbell
  127. Warrick, Joby (19 May 2010). "WikiLeaks works to expose government secrets, but Web site's sources are a mystery". The Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/19/AR2010051905333.html. Retrieved 21 May 2010. </li>
  128. Template:cite video
  129. Assange TED interview. Event occurs at 13:55
  130. By Richard Galant, CNN (16 July 2010). "WikiLeaks founder: Site getting tons of 'high caliber' disclosures - CNN.com". CNN. http://edition.cnn.com/2010/TECH/web/07/16/wikileaks.disclosures/. Retrieved 1 August 2010. </li>
  131. Owen, Glen; Stewart, Will (14 November 2010). "Bank raid could have been warning against planned WikiLeaks Russian corruption expose says Alexander Lebedev". Mail Online. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1329561/Wikileaks-Russian-corruption-expose-plan-linked-Alexander-Lebedev-bank-raid.html. Retrieved 28 November 2010. </li>
  132. WikiLeaks ready to drop a bombshell on Russia. But will Russians get to read about it?. CSMonitor.com. URL accessed on 29 November 2010.
  133. Andy Greenberg (29 November 2010). "An Interview With WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange". Forbes. http://blogs.forbes.com/andygreenberg/2010/11/29/an-interview-with-wikileaks-julian-assange/2/. Retrieved 1 December 2010. </li>
  134. Rothacker, Rick. "Bank of America rumored to be in WikiLeaks’ crosshairs". The Boston Herald. http://news.bostonherald.com/business/general/view.bg?articleid=1299995. Retrieved 1 December 2010. </li>
  135. Mark, Memmott (1 December 2010). "Bank Of America Stock Steadies After WikiLeaks-Related Drop". NPR. http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2010/12/01/131727190/bank-of-america-stock-steadies-after-wikileaks-related-drop. Retrieved 2 December 2010. </li>
  136. De La Merced, Michael (30 November 2010). "WikiLeaks’ Next Target: Bank of America?". New York Times. http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2010/11/30/wikileaks-next-target-bank-of-america/. Retrieved 2 December 2010.ref>By John Carney, CNBC (2 December 2010). "Bank of America's Risky WikiLeaks Strategy". CNBC. http://www.cnbc.com/id/40471184/. Retrieved d December 2010. </li> </ol>

External links

You can help Anarchopedia by expanding this article by adding some of these quotes from Wikiquote
Template:Commons category