Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.

Cablegate content: East Asia and Oceania

From Anarchopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

See also WikiLeaks, WikiLeaks: List of mirror sites

This article has been split into separate sections to handle the large amount of information


The United States diplomatic cables leak began on 28 November 2010 when the website WikiLeaks and five major newspapers published confidential documents of detailed correspondences between the U.S. State Department and its diplomatic missions around the world. The publication of the U.S. embassy cables is the third in a series of U.S. classified document "mega-leaks" distributed by WikiLeaks in 2010, following the Afghan War Diary in July, and the Iraq War Logs in October. The cables describe international affairs from 274 embassies dated from 1966–2010.

Eastern Asia and Oceania[edit]

Australia[edit]
  • Then Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd advised Hillary Clinton to be in a position to use force against China "if everything goes wrong".[1]
  • In Washington during a March 24, 2009 meeting, Rudd described to Clinton that China was "paranoid" about Taiwan and Tibet, and that his plan for an "Asia-Pacific Community" was envisaged to weaken China's authority in the region.[1]
People's Republic of China[edit]
  • A Chinese official revealed that both public opinion in China and the government are "increasingly critical" of North Korea, stating that "China's influence with the North was frequently overestimated".[2] The Chinese mentioned that they do not "like" North Korea, but "they are a neighbor".[3]
  • A Chinese contact told the U.S. Embassy in Beijing that the Politburo of the Communist Party of China was responsible for instigating the January 2010 Google hacking incident[4] which was part of a wider "coordinated campaign of computer sabotage carried out by government operatives, private security experts and Internet outlaws recruited by the Chinese government"[4] targeting the U.S. and its Western allies.[5][6]
  • In February 2009, the U.S. Ambassador to Kyrgyzstan spoke to her Chinese counterpart, Zhang Yannian, after being notified that China had offered Kyrgyzstan $3 billion in return for the closure of Manas Air Base — an important U.S. base in Bishkek handling flights into and out of Afghanistan. She stated that during the encounter "visibly flustered, Zhang temporarily lost the ability to speak Russian and began spluttering in Chinese". He responded with his own proposal to the U.S. on dealing with the Kyrgyz to keep the base open, during which his aide remarked: "Or maybe you should give them $5 billion and buy both us and the Russians out".[7][8]
  • China's foreign policy has been criticized by a Western diplomat as a "newly pugnacious", despite earlier policies assuring China's rise would be a "peaceful" one. US ambassador to Beijing, Jon Huntsman, Jr., has stated that the recent policy shift is "losing friends worldwide". Huntsman discussed a British diplomat critical of conduct by Chinese officials at the Copenhagen climate change summit, who considered the change in China's approach "shocking". He mentions that "China's more aggressive approach" has caused India to strengthen their relationship with the United States. Japanese diplomats confirmed the new "aggressive" approach, and a Moroccan diplomat commented that "China will never play the role of a global leader if it treats its trade partners so poorly". However, Huntsman reminds that this does not imply that nations will turn toward the United States in response, and that many countries are equally suspicious of the Americans as they are of the Chinese. He quotes Juliu Ole Sunkuli, who "claimed that Africa was better off thanks to China's practical, bilateral approach to development assistance and was concerned that this would be changed by 'western' interference… Sunkuli said Africans were frustrated by western insistence on capacity building, which translated, in his eyes, into conferences and seminars. They instead preferred China's focus on infrastructure and tangible projects."[9][10]
  • The cables state that China is engaging in cyberwarfare to bolster offensive and defensive computer network operations capabilities. Their recruits include Lin Yong, using the alias Lion, who founded the Honker Union of China, a Chinese hacker group that emerged after the US bombing of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade in 1999 and XFocus, the hacker group that released blaster worm in August 2003.[11]
Koreas[edit]
  • North Korea was behaving like a "spoiled child", according to Chinese officials, who were prepared to accept Korean reunification under South Korean leadership. They estimated they could cope with an influx of 300,000 North Korean refugees in the event of instability on the peninsula.[2]
  • U.S. and South Korea officials have discussed reunification of the two Koreas should the North ultimately collapse, according to the American ambassador to Seoul.[12]
Thailand[edit]
  • In Thailand, Russian associates of alleged arms dealer Viktor Bout tried to block his extradition from Thailand to America by bribing a key witness in the case, US diplomats warned in secret cables.[13] Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva was insisting his government was not subject to pressure from Washington to extradite suspected Russian arms smuggler Viktor Bout.[13]

Citations[edit]

  1. 1.0 1.1 Explosive Wiki Rudd cable. Theage.com.au. URL accessed on 2010-12-07.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Tisdall, Simon (29 November 2010). "Wikileaks Cables Reveal China 'Ready To Abandon North Korea'". The Guardian. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/nov/29/wikileaks-cables-china-reunified-korea. Retrieved 3 December 2010. </li>
  3. Tisdall, Simon. Wikileaks Cables Reveal China 'Ready To Abandon North Korea' — Leaked Dispatches Show Beijing Is Frustrated with Military Actions of 'Spoiled Child' and Increasingly Favours Reunified Korea. The Guardian. URL accessed on 30 November 2010.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Shane, Scott; Lehren, Andrew W.. Cables Shine Light Into Secret Diplomatic Channels. The New York Times. URL accessed on 28 November 2010.
  5. Colvin, Ross (28 November 2010). "Saudi King Urged U.S. To Attack Iran: WikiLeaks". Reuters. http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6AP06Z20101128. Retrieved 28 November 2010. </li>
  6. Obtained by WikiLeaks Shine Light Into Secret Diplomatic Channels - Page 2; The New York Times. Retrieved 28 November 2010.
  7. Chinese Ambassador Flustered by Kyrgyz Allegations of Money for Closing Manas. US Embassy, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan. URL accessed on 2 December 2010.Template:Clarify
  8. Trilling, David. China Gives U.S. Base Advice — Wikileaks. Eurasianet. URL accessed on 3 December 2010.
  9. WikiLeaks cables: 'Aggressive' China losing friends around the world. The Guardian. URL accessed on 5 December 2010.
  10. Press Trust of India (6 December 2010). "‘Aggressive’ China leaves India, others worried". Indian Express. http://www.indianexpress.com/news/-Aggressive--China--leaves-India--others-worried/720864. </li>
  11. WikiLeaks cables reveal fears over Chinese cyber warfare. The Guardian. URL accessed on 5 December 2010.
  12. Cables Obtained by WikiLeaks Shine Light Into Secret Diplomatic Channels. The New York Times.
  13. 13.0 13.1 US Cables Reveal Bribe Fears in Thai Bout Arms Case. Bangkok Post. URL accessed on 5 December 2010.
  14. </ol>