Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.
Difference between revisions of "religion"
m (Reverted edits by 86.140.227.141 (Talk); changed back to last version by 71.29.27.23) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Definition== | ==Definition== | ||
| − | Religion can be summarized as organized spirituality. Each religion has its own individual doctrine to explain the method of understanding the spiritual. | + | Religion can be summarized as organized spirituality. Each religion has its own individual doctrine to explain the method of understanding the spiritual. |
==Opposing views== | ==Opposing views== | ||
| − | Religion has been proven to be a form of mental illness | + | Religion has been proven to be a form of mental illness in which the sufferer is often delusional. Some people have been cured, but most are ill for their whole lives. Typical behaviour includes: |
*speaking to non-existent beings | *speaking to non-existent beings | ||
*kneeling | *kneeling | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | Religion is a perfectly natural result of human illogicity | + | Religion is a perfectly natural result of human illogicity. Some claim to have overcome it, but these people are most likely a) lying, b) freaks, c) deeply disturbed. c.f. [[asexuality]]. Typical religious behaviour includes: |
*speaking to non-existent beings | *speaking to non-existent beings | ||
*prayer and/or [[magick]] | *prayer and/or [[magick]] | ||
Revision as of 21:46, 5 October 2006
Definition
Religion can be summarized as organized spirituality. Each religion has its own individual doctrine to explain the method of understanding the spiritual.
Opposing views
Religion has been proven to be a form of mental illness in which the sufferer is often delusional. Some people have been cured, but most are ill for their whole lives. Typical behaviour includes:
- speaking to non-existent beings
- kneeling
- associating circumstance with the act of higher beings or deities
- the worshipping of books as 'masters'
Incorporating and supporting religion over science is a sign of naivity.
Religion is a perfectly natural result of human illogicity. Some claim to have overcome it, but these people are most likely a) lying, b) freaks, c) deeply disturbed. c.f. asexuality. Typical religious behaviour includes:
- speaking to non-existent beings
- prayer and/or magick
- the worshipping of books and other storehouses of knowledge
Religion is nothing to be ashamed of. Religion is a natural part of humanity, and to deny it is to deny biology.
