Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.

WikiLeaks leaks before 2009

From Anarchopedia
Revision as of 02:06, 4 May 2012 by Anarchangel (Talk | contribs) (cats)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

See main article WikiLeaks, WikiLeaks leaks (2009) and WikiLeaks leaks (2010)

The international non-profit media organization WikiLeaks publishes submissions of otherwise unavailable documents from anonymous news sources and leaks. Launched in 2006, its database had grown to more than 1.2 million documents within a year.

Pre-2009[edit]

Apparent Somali assassination order[edit]

WikiLeaks posted its first document in December 2006, a decision to assassinate government officials signed by Sheikh Hassan Dahir Aweys.[1] The New Yorker has reported that

[Julian] Assange and the others were uncertain of its authenticity, but they thought that readers, using Wikipedia-like features of the site, would help analyze it. They published the decision with a lengthy commentary, which asked, “Is it a bold manifesto by a flamboyant Islamic militant with links to Bin Laden? Or is it a clever smear by US intelligence, designed to discredit the Union, fracture Somali alliances and manipulate China?” ... The document’s authenticity was never determined, and news about WikiLeaks quickly superseded the leak itself.[1]

Daniel arap Moi family corruption[edit]

On 31 August 2007, The Guardian (Britain) featured on its front page a story about corruption by the family of the former Kenyan leader Daniel arap Moi. The newspaper stated that the source of the information was WikiLeaks.[2]

Bank Julius Baer lawsuit[edit]

In February 2008, the wikileaks.org domain name was taken offline after the Swiss Bank Julius Baer sued WikiLeaks and the wikileaks.org domain registrar, Dynadot, in a court in California, United States, and obtained a permanent injunction ordering the shutdown.[3][4] WikiLeaks had hosted allegations of illegal activities at the bank's Cayman Island branch.[3] WikiLeaks' U.S. Registrar, Dynadot, complied with the order by removing its DNS entries. However, the website remained accessible via its numeric IP address, and online activists immediately mirrored WikiLeaks at dozens of alternative websites worldwide.[5]

The American Civil Liberties Union and the Electronic Frontier Foundation filed a motion protesting the censorship of WikiLeaks. The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press assembled a coalition of media and press that filed an amicus curiae brief on WikiLeaks' behalf. The coalition included major U.S. newspaper publishers and press organisations, such as the American Society of Newspaper Editors, The Associated Press, the Citizen Media Law Project, The E.W. Scripps Company, the Gannett Company, The Hearst Corporation, the Los Angeles Times, the National Newspaper Publishers Association, the Newspaper Association of America and The Society of Professional Journalists. The coalition requested to be heard as a friend of the court to call attention to relevant points of law that it believed the court had overlooked (on the grounds that WikiLeaks had not appeared in court to defend itself, and that no First Amendment issues had yet been raised before the court). Amongst other things, the coalition argued that:[5]
"WikiLeaks provides a forum for dissidents and whistleblowers across the globe to post documents, but the Dynadot injunction imposes a prior restraint that drastically curtails access to Wikileaks from the Internet based on a limited number of postings challenged by Plaintiffs. The Dynadot injunction therefore violates the bedrock principle that an injunction cannot enjoin all communication by a publisher or other speaker."[5]

The same judge, Judge Jeffrey White, who issued the injunction vacated it on 29 February 2008, citing First Amendment concerns and questions about legal jurisdiction.[6] WikiLeaks was thus able to bring its site online again. The bank dropped the case on 5 March 2008.[7] The judge also denied the bank's request for an order prohibiting the website's publication.[5]

The Executive Director of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, Lucy Dalglish, commented:

"It's not very often a federal judge does a 180 degree turn in a case and dissolves an order. But we're very pleased the judge recognized the constitutional implications in this prior restraint."[5]

Guantánamo Bay procedures[edit]

A copy of Standard Operating Procedures for Camp Delta–the protocol of the U.S. Army at the Guantánamo Bay detention camp–dated March 2003 was released on the WikiLeaks website on 7 November 2007.[8] The document, named "gitmo-sop.pdf", is also mirrored at The Guardian.[9] Its release revealed some of the restrictions placed over detainees at the camp, including the designation of some prisoners as off-limits to the International Committee of the Red Cross, something that the U.S. military had in the past repeatedly denied.[10]

On 3 December 2007, WikiLeaks released a copy of the 2004 edition of the manual,[11] together with a detailed analysis of the changes.[12]

Scientology[edit]

On 7 April 2008, WikiLeaks reported receiving a letter (dated 27 March) from the Religious Technology Centre claiming ownership of several recently leaked documents pertaining to OT Levels within the Church of Scientology. These same documents were at the center of a 1994 scandal. The email stated:
"The Advanced Technology materials are unpublished, copyrighted works. Please be advised that your customer's action in this regard violates United States copyright law. Accordingly, we ask for your help in removing these works immediately from your service. – Moxon and Kobrin[13]"

The letter continued on to request the release of the logs of the uploader, which would remove their anonymity. WikiLeaks responded with a statement released on Wikinews stating: "in response to the attempted suppression, WikiLeaks will release several thousand additional pages of Scientology material next week",[14] and did so.

Sarah Palin's Yahoo email account contents[edit]

In September 2008, during the 2008 United States presidential election campaigns, the contents of a Yahoo account belonging to Sarah Palin (the running mate of Republican presidential nominee John McCain) were posted on WikiLeaks after being hacked into by members of Anonymous.[15] It has been alleged by Wired that contents of the mailbox indicate that she used the private Yahoo account to send work-related messages, in violation of public record laws.[16] The hacking of the account was widely reported in mainstream news outlets.[17][18][19] Although WikiLeaks was able to conceal the hacker's identity, the source of the Palin emails was eventually publicly identified as David Kernell, a 20-year-old economics student at the University of Tennessee and the son of Democratic Tennessee State Representative Mike Kernell from Memphis,[20] whose email address (as listed on various social networking sites) was linked to the hacker's identity on Anonymous.[21] Kernell attempted to conceal his identity by using the anonymous proxy service ctunnel.com, but, because of the illegal nature of the access, ctunnel website administrator Gabriel Ramuglia assisted the FBI in tracking down the source of the hack.[22]

BNP membership list[edit]

After briefly appearing on a blog, the membership list of the far-right British National Party was posted to WikiLeaks on 18 November 2008. The name, address, age and occupation of many of the 13,500 members were given, including several police officers, two solicitors, four ministers of religion, at least one doctor, and a number of primary and secondary school teachers. In Britain, police officers are banned from joining or promoting the BNP, and at least one officer was dismissed for being a member.[23] The BNP was known for going to considerable lengths to conceal the identities of members. On 19 November, BNP leader Nick Griffin stated that he knew the identity of the person who initially leaked the list on 17 November, describing him as a "hardliner" senior employee who left the party in 2007.[24][25][26] On 20 October 2009, a list of BNP members from April 2009 was leaked. This list contained 11,811 members.[27]
  1. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Khatchdourian
  2. Rice, Xan (31 August 2007). "The looting of Kenya". The Guardian (London). http://www.guardian.co.uk/kenya/story/0,,2159757,00.html. Retrieved 28 February 2008. </li>
  3. 3.0 3.1 Template:cite press release
  4. Bank Julius Baer & Co. Ltd. et al. v. Wikileaks et al. News.justia.com. URL accessed on 13 March 2009.
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 Judge reverses Wikileaks injunction. The Inquirer. URL accessed on 23 September 2009.
  6. Philipp Gollner (29 February 2008). "Judge reverses ruling in Julius Baer leak case". Reuters. http://www.reuters.com/article/internetNews/idUSN2927431720080229. Retrieved 1 March 2008. </li>
  7. Claburn, Thomas Swiss Bank Abandons Lawsuit Against WikiLeaks: The wiki had posted financial documents it said proved tax evasion by Bank Julius Baer's clients. InformationWeek.
  8. "Sensitive Guantánamo Bay Manual Leaked Through Wiki Site", Wired 14 November 2007
  9. specific address at The Guardian.
  10. "Guantanamo operating manual posted on Internet". Reuters. 15 November 2007. http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN1424207020071114?pageNumber=1. Retrieved 15 November 2007. </li>
  11. Camp Delta Operating Procedure (2004). WikiLeaks. Archived from source 3 April 2008. URL accessed on 13 March 2009.
  12. Changes in Guantanamo SOP manual (2003–2004). WikiLeaks. Archived from source 4 April 2008. URL accessed on 13 March 2009.
  13. Church of Scientology collected Operating Thetan Documents, including full text of legal letter..Template:dead link
  14. Church of Scientology warns WikiLeaks over documents.
  15. See the article "Anonymous (Group)"
  16. Group Posts E-Mail Hacked From Palin Account â€“ Update. Wired.
  17. Shear, Michael D.; Karl Vick (18 September 2008). "Hackers Access Palin's Personal E-Mail, Post Some Online". The Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/17/AR2008091703304.html?hpid=topnews. Retrieved 18 September 2008. </li>
  18. "FBI, Secret Service Investigate Hacking of Palin’s E-mail". Fox News. 18 September 2008. http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/09/18/palins-e-mail-hacked/. Retrieved 18 September 2008. </li>
  19. Swaine, Jon (18 September 2008). "Sarah Palin's email account broken into by hackers". The Daily Telegraph (London). http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/uselection2008/sarahpalin/2980391/Sarah-Palins-email-account-broken-into-by-hackers.html. Retrieved 18 September 2008. </li>
  20. Federal Bureau of Investigation â€“ Knoxville Division â€“ Press Releases â€“ Department of Justice. Knoxville.fbi.gov. URL accessed on 16 November 2009.
  21. Palin Email Hacker Found. Slashdot. URL accessed on 21 September 2008.
  22. Memo to US Secret Service: Net proxy may pinpoint Palin email hackers. TheRegister. URL accessed on 21 September 2008.
  23. "'BNP membership' officer sacked". BBC. 21 March 2009. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/merseyside/7956824.stm. Retrieved 23 March 2009. </li>
  24. Cobain, Ian (19 November 2008). "BNP membership list posted online by former 'hardliner'". The Guardian (London). http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/nov/19/bnp-list. Retrieved 19 November 2008. </li>
  25. BNP Membership List Exposed. Infoshop News. URL accessed on 19 November 2008.
  26. Lea, Michael; Boden, Nicola (19 November 2008). "Police officer faces investigation after being 'outed' as BNP supporter in membership leak". London: DailyMail. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1087101/Police-officer-faces-investigation-outed-BNP-supporter-membership-leak.html. Retrieved 19 November 2008. </li>
  27. Booth, Robert (20 October 2009). "BNP membership list leaked". Guardian (London). http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/oct/20/bnp-membership-list-wikileaks. Retrieved 20 October 2009. </li> </ol>