Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.

User talk:142.177.114.25

From Anarchopedia
Revision as of 02:10, 10 July 2015 by 76.11.95.94 (Talk) (removing stuff I'm less certain of - looking into it, it seems this person is perhaps capable of organizing vast conspiracies, e.g. tricking Wayne Crookes into suing the entire Internet, #nofrack etc)

Jump to: navigation, search

142,

On Wikipedia, you have been infamous. There has been some questions on whether you are this person, and many have suspected that you are. I suspect that the identities "24" and "142" are collective accounts, and that one person is a member of both. Is this correct? Reviewing 24's contributions, I agree with whoever says it is unethical to attribute the contributions to one person. I am very curious, as to who is behind you and 24. Do you personally know 24? Did 24 move to another city and become 142?

Apparently, Wikipedia thinks both IPs are one person. Many wikipedians attribute 24 and 142's contributions to one person, one person being the name of Cr--g H----y. Most people think that the Cr--g H----y person moved to somewhere else, and H----y's IP range changed. However, some Wikipedians agree with me and think that you are a DramaticIdentity. I do not interpret what you did on Wikipedia as any kind of threat, and nothing that deserved your hard ban.

The person by the name of Cr--g H----y is apparently some kind of politician, a green economist, and a member of the Canadian Green Party. However, a Google search for your name reveals that many people have used your name, none of which is the "real Cr--g H----y". Because of this, I dispute whether Cr--g H----y is a real name, or just a multiple use name. There may be a real person by the name of Cr--g H----y, and this is another thing that I question. If there is a real Cr--g H----y, are you the real Cr--g H----y? If not, are you related? Are Cr--g H----y a "they" rather than a "he" or a "ze"? (Are there multiple people behind "24"?)

I am not trying to stalk you, but: who are you, anyway? ANONYMITY@ 02:06, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Odd that you redact part of someone's name in the first few references and then just use it. In case this was a stupid error, I redacted all of the uses of that name just to be consistent.
Just to correct one incorrect statements, Wikipedia does not "think" anything, the user "24" was still free to edit as of January 2005 (the last contribution at [1]), which was long after the last contribution by the other addresses accused of conspiring. So it cannot be the case that "24" was considered to be the same person or conspiracy.

This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify him/her. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.