Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wikipedia"
From Anarchopedia
(→I've a question for those running this site.) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | oloacd | ||
==Was this Wikipedia article== | ==Was this Wikipedia article== | ||
Good question actually. I'm not sure. I assumed that it was because it said so in the refferences section, but i don't have any information beyond that. {{user:beta_m/sig}} | Good question actually. I'm not sure. I assumed that it was because it said so in the refferences section, but i don't have any information beyond that. {{user:beta_m/sig}} | ||
| − | :Perhaps you got confused by the fact that "Wikipedia" is in the title of the article? The references section had a link to an article at develop.consumerism.org. [[User: | + | :Perhaps you got confused by the fact that "Wikipedia" is in the title of the article? The references section had a link to an article at develop.consumerism.org. [[User:e★f|e★f]] 00:36, 12 Dec 2005 (UTC) |
==This is ''not'' [[vandalism]]== | ==This is ''not'' [[vandalism]]== | ||
Revision as of 08:40, 19 October 2007
oloacd
Was this Wikipedia article
Good question actually. I'm not sure. I assumed that it was because it said so in the refferences section, but i don't have any information beyond that. User:Beta m/sig
- Perhaps you got confused by the fact that "Wikipedia" is in the title of the article? The references section had a link to an article at develop.consumerism.org. e★f 00:36, 12 Dec 2005 (UTC)
This is not vandalism
Cool, I am editing "wikipedia"! YourLocalVandal 14:21, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
- Good on ya mate for "not" vandalising. Mathmo 14:26, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
I've a question for those running this site.
I have my own site critical of Wikipedia. It's: IHateWikipediaDOTcom. Is it something worth mentioning on this page? I've learned from Wikipedia to be cautious about mentioning it. 12.214.202.204 17:26, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
