Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hakim Bey"
From Anarchopedia
(bolimonba) |
Anarchangel (Talk | contribs) (Undo rev 46661 by 190.120.224.77 'WoW spam' ('belt' and 'toehold', which are not actually game terms, are evidence of it being a hoax, even)) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
I'd like to know how an accusation of paedophilia, even if proven correct, could discredit a philosophical system. Or do we have to say that X's fantastic novel is in fact very poor because he/she is gay? | I'd like to know how an accusation of paedophilia, even if proven correct, could discredit a philosophical system. Or do we have to say that X's fantastic novel is in fact very poor because he/she is gay? | ||
: I agree, it's absurd. It's gone now. [[User:Zazaban|Zazaban]] 19:42, 26 August 2008 (UTC) | : I agree, it's absurd. It's gone now. [[User:Zazaban|Zazaban]] 19:42, 26 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:58, 23 January 2011
I'd like to know how an accusation of paedophilia, even if proven correct, could discredit a philosophical system. Or do we have to say that X's fantastic novel is in fact very poor because he/she is gay?
- I agree, it's absurd. It's gone now. Zazaban 19:42, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
