Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.

Difference between revisions of "Talk:George W. Bush"

From Anarchopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(extremely one sided)
(extremely one sided)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
== extremely one sided ==
 
== extremely one sided ==
  
i mean, wow.  whoever wrote this article sure does love george bush.  and what the hell is with that "Dedication poem" at the end.  is this really necessary?  i mean, it's inclusion is an embarrassment to the word encyclopedia.  this was the the first and last article i read on anarchopedia.   
+
i mean, wow.  whoever wrote this article sure does love george bush.  and what the hell is with that "Dedication poem" at the end.  is this really necessary?  i mean, its inclusion is an embarrassment to the word encyclopedia.  this was the the first and last article i read on anarchopedia.   
  
 
goodbye.
 
goodbye.

Revision as of 21:20, 3 March 2006

This article appears to be one sided and ignores a lot of common information about G. W. Bush. Compare with Wikipedia:George W. Bush.

extremely one sided

i mean, wow. whoever wrote this article sure does love george bush. and what the hell is with that "Dedication poem" at the end. is this really necessary? i mean, its inclusion is an embarrassment to the word encyclopedia. this was the the first and last article i read on anarchopedia.

goodbye.