Talk:George W. Bush

This article appears to be one sided and ignores a lot of common information about G. W. Bush. Compare with Wikipedia:George W. Bush.

extremely one sided

i mean, wow. whoever wrote this article sure does love george bush. and what the hell is with that "Dedication poem" at the end. is this really necessary? i mean, its inclusion is an embarrassment to the word encyclopedia. this was the the first and last article i read on anarchopedia.

goodbye.

Thanks for your opinion. I don't see a problem since the article is already clearly signaled as being non-neutral and anybody free to fix/improve it. rev 22 22:06, 3 Mar 2006 (UTC)

This is ANARCHOPEDIA. How about an section on the stolen election of 2000 and the second stolen election in 2004.--69.196.150.118 22:50, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

^That is a good point. Does anyone know, did those stolen elections ever turn up again, or are they presumed gone for good?

Praise Bush!

Please. Anyone who doesn't like praising Bush is an idiot. No one in recent history has done more to discredit authority and executive power than Bush. After Bush, no one will want to give anyone that kind of power ever again. And that's well worth praising.

Bush is a useful idiot.