Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:George W. Bush"
From Anarchopedia
m (→extremely one sided) |
(→extremely one sided) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:Thanks for your opinion. I don't see a problem since the article is already clearly signaled as being non-neutral and anybody free to fix/improve it. [[User:rev 22|rev 22]] 22:06, 3 Mar 2006 (UTC) | :Thanks for your opinion. I don't see a problem since the article is already clearly signaled as being non-neutral and anybody free to fix/improve it. [[User:rev 22|rev 22]] 22:06, 3 Mar 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | This is ANARCHOPEDIA. How about an section on the stolen election of 2000 and the second stolen election in 2004.--[[User:69.196.150.118|69.196.150.118]] 22:50, 5 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:50, 5 October 2006
This article appears to be one sided and ignores a lot of common information about G. W. Bush. Compare with Wikipedia:George W. Bush.
extremely one sided
i mean, wow. whoever wrote this article sure does love george bush. and what the hell is with that "Dedication poem" at the end. is this really necessary? i mean, its inclusion is an embarrassment to the word encyclopedia. this was the the first and last article i read on anarchopedia.
goodbye.
- Thanks for your opinion. I don't see a problem since the article is already clearly signaled as being non-neutral and anybody free to fix/improve it. rev 22 22:06, 3 Mar 2006 (UTC)
This is ANARCHOPEDIA. How about an section on the stolen election of 2000 and the second stolen election in 2004.--69.196.150.118 22:50, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
