Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.

Difference between revisions of "Individualist anarchism"

From Anarchopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎Anarho-individualismul)
 
(40 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
==Anarho-individualismul==
+
'''Individualist anarchism''' is a variety of [[anarchism]] that emphasises the importance of the [[individualism|individual]].
 +
Several classical anarchist thinkers, such as [[Josiah Warren]], [[Benjamin Tucker]], [[Lysander Spooner]], [[Max Stirner]], [[Dora Marsden]] and Joseph Labadie, are known as individualist anarchists. Voltarine De Cleyre in her early career was also an individualist anarchist.
  
−
Anarho-individualismul este o forma a [[anarchism|anarhismului]] care arata importanta [[individualism|individului]]. O serie de ganditori anarhisti, cum ar fi [[Josiah Warren]], [[Benjamin Tucker]],  [[Lysander Spooner]], [[Max Stirner]], [[Dora Marsden]] sau [[Joseph Labadie]], sunt considerati anarhisti individualisti.
+
Their works argue for the sovereignty of the individual within their own life. Other such writers include [[Henry David Thoreau]] and John Henry Mackay.
−
Lucrarile lor lupta pentru [[soverignity of the individual|suveranitatea fiecarui individ]] in [[life|viata]] personala. Alti asemenea scriitori sunt [[Henry David Thoreau]] si [[John Henry Mackay]].
+
  
−
Anarho-individualistii sunt cunoscuti ca parte a traditiei lor de [[anarcho-capitalism|anarho-capitalisti]], pe de alta parte, cativa anarhisti individualisti recunosc o seama de lucrari a anarho-capitalistilor ca parte a traditiei, dar fara a fii de acord cu ele in totalitate.
+
== Individualist anarchists and private property ==
  
−
[[libertarian socialism|Socialistii libertarieni]] insista ca multi din acesti autori, incluzandu-l si pe [[Pierre-Joseph Proudhon]], au respins bazele esentiale ale [[capitalism|capitalismului]], si anume legalitatea proprietatii private (ca fiind in opozitie cu simplul drept de folosinta), in special cu privire la pamant, si plata interesului sau a chiriei.
+
Individualist anarchists are claimed as part of their tradition by [[anarcho-capitalism|anarcho-capitalists]], in turn, some individualist anarchists claim some works by anarcho-capitalists as part of their tradition, though without fully adhering to them.
  
−
[[anarcho-capitalism|Anarho-capitalistii]] apreciaza accentul pe care acesti ganditori l-au pus pe drepturile individuale sau libertate, si pe conceptiile bazate pe piata decat pe cele bazate pe [[collectivism|colectivism]]; ei sunt de acord cu [[Frederic Bastiat]] [[Frederic Bastiat/debate with Proudhon|ca un raspuns lui Proudhon]].
+
[[libertarian socialism|Libertarian socialists]] insist that many of these authors, after and including [[Pierre-Joseph Proudhon]], rejected essential foundations of [[capitalism]], namely the legalism of private property (as opposed to the mere right to use), particulary with regard to land, and the charging of interest or rent.
  
−
Anarho-capitalistii ar putea de altfel sa gandeasca precum [[Max Stirner]] care este, discutabil, dintre anarhistii individualisti, cel cu orientarea cea mai [[philosophy|filosofica]], a respins ideile lui Proudhon despre proprietate ca un bun colectiv, dar si toate felurile de [[liberalism]] precum si ideea de drept la proprietatea personala ca  o iluzie sau "fantoma", exprimand clar ca nu exista nici un drept divin de a poseda ceva, omul doar are ce are si atat. In viziunea lui Stimer nu exista nici o obligatie [[morality|morala]] legata de proprietate sau orice altceva in ceea ce priveste. Astfel el considera ambele conceptii ale lui Proudhon, "propretatea individuala ca furt"(parafrazat) ''si'' ideea [[libertarianism|libertariana]] de proprietate ca un principiu natural fondat pe [[superstition|superstitii]]. (In acest concept el include explicit toate posesiunile "fara insemnatate" sau "spirituale", vezi si ''[[The Ego and His Own]]''.)
+
[[anarcho-capitalism|Anarcho-capitalists]] appreciate
 +
the emphasis given by these thinkers on individual rights and liberty,
 +
and on market-based approaches rather than [[collectivism]]; they agree
 +
with Frederic Bastiat in his responses to Proudhon.
 +
 
 +
[[Max Stirner]] rejected Proudhon's ideas about property as a collective good, but also rejected all kinds of [[liberalism]] and the idea of rights to personal properties as an illusion or "ghost", clearly stating that there is no divine right to own anything, you only have what you have and that's it. In Stirner's view there are no moral obligations attached to property, or anything else for that matter. Thus he deems both Proudhon's concept of "individual property as theft" (paraphrased) ''and'' the [[libertarianism|libertarian]] idea of property as a natural principle as founded in [[superstition|superstitious]] beliefs. (In this concept he also explicitly included all "immaterial" or "spiritual" possessions, see ''The Ego and His Own''.)
 +
 
 +
== See also ==
 +
* [[Autonomism]]
 +
* Egoism
 +
* An Anarchist FAQ - Is individualist anarchism capitalistic? - Introduction
 +
* [[An Anarchist FAQ - What are the differences between individualist and social anarchists?]]
 +
n
 +
 
 +
== External links ==
 +
* [http://www.mondopolitico.com/library/wendymcelroy/ia.ca.libertarianism/mpintro.htm Mondo Politico Library's presentation of Wendy McElroy's speech, ''Individualist Anarchism vs. Communist Anarchism and Libertarianism'' (Full text; formatted for easy on-screen reading)]
 +
* [http://www.spaz.org/~dan/individualist-anarchist/resources.html Individualist anarchist resources]
 +
* [http://www.zetetics.com/mac/ Wendy McElroy], an Anarcho-Capitalist who claims to be a modern Individualist Anarchist
 +
* [http://www.rawilson.com/main.shtml Robert Anton Wilson], another modern Individualist Anarchist
 +
* [http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/1931/secGcon.html libertarian socialist views on individualist anarchism]
 +
* [http://www.BlackCrayon.com/ BlackCrayon.com]: Philosophical Anarchism
 +
* [http://againstpolitics.com/individualist_anarchism/index.html Against Politics]: Individualist Anarchism (Page no longer available)
 +
* [http://theanarchistlibrary.org/topics/individualist.html Collection of texts on Individualist Anarchism] (theanarchistlibrary.org)
 +
* [http://www.archive.org/details/HandbookForRebelsAndOutlawsResistingTyrantsHangmenAndPriests Internet Archive (''Handbook for Rebels and Outlaws'' Free Download PDF File)]
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
{{wikipedia|Anarcho-individualism}}
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Individualist anarchism]]
 +
 
 +
[[da:Individualistisk anarkisme]]
 +
[[de:Libertärer Individualismus]]
 +
[[eo:Individuisma anarkiismo]]
 +
[[es:Anarquismo individualista]]
 +
[[fa:آنارشیسم فردگرا]]
 +
[[fi:Anarkoindividualismi]]
 +
[[fr:Individualisme anarchiste]]
 +
[[he:אנרכיזם אינדיבידואליסטי]]
 +
[[hr:anarho-individualizam]]
 +
[[it:anarco-individualismo]]
 +
[[nl:individualistisch anarchisme]]
 +
[[pl:Anarchoindywidualizm]]
 +
[[pt:anarquismo individualista]]
 +
[[sr:anarho-individualizam]]
 +
[[sv:Individualanarkism]]
 +
[[tr:Bireyci anarÅŸizm]]
 +
[[zh:個人無政府主義]]

Latest revision as of 16:59, 19 November 2012

Individualist anarchism is a variety of anarchism that emphasises the importance of the individual. Several classical anarchist thinkers, such as Josiah Warren, Benjamin Tucker, Lysander Spooner, Max Stirner, Dora Marsden and Joseph Labadie, are known as individualist anarchists. Voltarine De Cleyre in her early career was also an individualist anarchist.

Their works argue for the sovereignty of the individual within their own life. Other such writers include Henry David Thoreau and John Henry Mackay.

Individualist anarchists and private property[edit]

Individualist anarchists are claimed as part of their tradition by anarcho-capitalists, in turn, some individualist anarchists claim some works by anarcho-capitalists as part of their tradition, though without fully adhering to them.

Libertarian socialists insist that many of these authors, after and including Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, rejected essential foundations of capitalism, namely the legalism of private property (as opposed to the mere right to use), particulary with regard to land, and the charging of interest or rent.

Anarcho-capitalists appreciate the emphasis given by these thinkers on individual rights and liberty, and on market-based approaches rather than collectivism; they agree with Frederic Bastiat in his responses to Proudhon.

Max Stirner rejected Proudhon's ideas about property as a collective good, but also rejected all kinds of liberalism and the idea of rights to personal properties as an illusion or "ghost", clearly stating that there is no divine right to own anything, you only have what you have and that's it. In Stirner's view there are no moral obligations attached to property, or anything else for that matter. Thus he deems both Proudhon's concept of "individual property as theft" (paraphrased) and the libertarian idea of property as a natural principle as founded in superstitious beliefs. (In this concept he also explicitly included all "immaterial" or "spiritual" possessions, see The Ego and His Own.)

See also[edit]

n

External links[edit]


This article contains content from Wikipedia. Current versions of the GNU FDL article Anarcho-individualism on WP may contain information useful to the improvement of this article WP
Retrieved from "http://eng.anarchopedia.org/index.php?title=Individualist_anarchism&oldid=55099"