Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.
Difference between revisions of "Individualist anarchism"
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
== Individualist anarchists and private property == | == Individualist anarchists and private property == | ||
| − | Individualist anarchists are claimed as part of their tradition by [[anarcho-capitalism|anarcho-capitalists | + | Individualist anarchists are claimed as part of their tradition by [[anarcho-capitalism|anarcho-capitalists]], in turn, some modern individualist anarchists claim some works by anarcho-capitalists as part of their tradition, though without fully adhering to them. |
| − | + | Most (if not all) of these authors, after and including [[Pierre-Joseph Proudhon]], rejected essential foundations of [[capitalism]], namely the legalism of private property (as opposed to the mere right to use), particulary with regard to land, and the charging of interest or rent. | |
[[anarcho-capitalism|Anarcho-capitalists]] appreciate | [[anarcho-capitalism|Anarcho-capitalists]] appreciate | ||
Revision as of 15:45, 16 June 2006
Individualist anarchism is a variety of anarchism that emphasises the importance of the individual.
Several classical anarchist thinkers, such as Josiah Warren, Benjamin Tucker, Lysander Spooner, Max Stirner, Dora Marsden and Joseph Labadie, are known as individualist anarchists.
Their works argue for the sovereignty of each individual within their own life. Other such writers include Henry David Thoreau and John Henry Mackay.
Individualist anarchists and private property
Individualist anarchists are claimed as part of their tradition by anarcho-capitalists, in turn, some modern individualist anarchists claim some works by anarcho-capitalists as part of their tradition, though without fully adhering to them.
Most (if not all) of these authors, after and including Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, rejected essential foundations of capitalism, namely the legalism of private property (as opposed to the mere right to use), particulary with regard to land, and the charging of interest or rent.
Anarcho-capitalists appreciate the emphasis given by these thinkers on individual rights and liberty, and on market-based approaches rather than "collectivism"; they agree with Frederic Bastiat in his responses to Proudhon.
Anarcho-capitalists can think also as well as Max Stirner who is arguably the most philosophically oriented of these individual anarchists, rejected Proudhon's ideas about property as a collective good, but also rejected all kinds of liberalism and the idea of rights to personal properties as an illusion or "ghost", clearly stating that there is no divine right to own anything, you only have what you have and that's it. In Stirner's view there are no moral obligations attached to property, or anything else for that matter. Thus he deems both Proudhon's concept of "individual property as theft" (paraphrased) and the libertarian idea of property as a natural principle as founded in superstitious beliefs. (In this concept he also explicitly included all "immaterial" or "spiritual" posessions, see The Ego and His Own.)
External links
- Mondo Politico Library's presentation of Wendy McElroy's speech, Individualist Anarchism vs. Communist Anarchism and Libertarianism (Full text; formatted for easy on-screen reading)
- Individualist anarchist resources
- Wendy McElroy, an Anarcho-Capitalist who claims to be a modern Individualist Anarchist
- Robert Anton Wilson, another modern Individualist Anarchist
- libertarian socialist views on individualist anarchism
- BlackCrayon.com: Philosophical Anarchism
- Against Politics: Individualist Anarchism
| This article contains content from Wikipedia. Current versions of the GNU FDL article Anarcho-individualism on WP may contain information useful to the improvement of this article | WP |
