Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.

Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Would be deleted but is too funny"

From Anarchopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m
(fixing my sig)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Template?==
 
==Template?==
We probably need to make a template that announces that the article is "Would be deleted", so that ppl won't start reading it thinking that it is actually true... q;-) {{User:Beta_M/sig}}
+
We probably need to make a template that announces that the article is "Would be deleted", so that ppl won't start reading it thinking that it is actually true... q;-) &nbsp;~&nbsp;[[User:Beta_M|User:]][[Buddhism|B]][[ethics|e]][[Taoism|t]][[anarchism|a]][[postmodernism|_]][[metaphysics|M]] (VolodyA!&nbsp;V&nbsp;Anarhist) <span class="plainlinksneverexpand"><sup>[{{fullurl:User_talk:Beta_M|action=edit&section=new}} Talk]</sup></span>
 
:Yes, a warning template would be nice. but right now I don't think it's needed.  Sometimes (as was the case with "[[troll-sysop struggle]]") an article has humoristic value because of the exaggerated ideological tone but don't contain false information.  This is, of course, just my opinion :) [[User:Rev 22|''Rev 22'']] 20:46, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
 
:Yes, a warning template would be nice. but right now I don't think it's needed.  Sometimes (as was the case with "[[troll-sysop struggle]]") an article has humoristic value because of the exaggerated ideological tone but don't contain false information.  This is, of course, just my opinion :) [[User:Rev 22|''Rev 22'']] 20:46, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 09:07, 17 May 2007

Template?[edit]

We probably need to make a template that announces that the article is "Would be deleted", so that ppl won't start reading it thinking that it is actually true... q;-)  ~ User:Beta_M (VolodyA! V Anarhist) Talk

Yes, a warning template would be nice. but right now I don't think it's needed. Sometimes (as was the case with "troll-sysop struggle") an article has humoristic value because of the exaggerated ideological tone but don't contain false information. This is, of course, just my opinion :) Rev 22 20:46, 18 April 2006 (UTC)