Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.

Difference between revisions of "Behavioral Science Consultation Team"

From Anarchopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(fix refs)
(...Links & note)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Image:BSCT briefing, Guantanamo.jpg|thumb|Guantanamo guards receiving a Behavioral Science briefing.]]
+
[[File:BSCT briefing, Guantanamo.jpg|thumb|250px|Guantanamo guards receiving a Behavioral Science briefing]]
The [[United States Department of Defense|Department of Defense]] authorized Behavioral Science Consultation Teams to study the detainees it holds in [[extrajudicial detention]].<ref name=TheWire2008-01-04>
+
The [[US Department of Defense]] [[Wikipedia:United States Department of Defense|(WP)]] authorized Behavioral Science Consultation Teams to study the detainees it holds in [[extrajudicial detention]] [[Wikipedia:extrajudicial detention|(WP)]].<ref name=TheWire2008-01-04>
 
{{cite news
 
{{cite news
 
| url=http://www.jtfgtmo.southcom.mil/wire/wire/WirePDF/v8/Issue48v8.pdf#page=4
 
| url=http://www.jtfgtmo.southcom.mil/wire/wire/WirePDF/v8/Issue48v8.pdf#page=4
 
| title=Hard work of BSCT validated by peers
 
| title=Hard work of BSCT validated by peers
 
| page=4
 
| page=4
| publisher=[[The Wire (JTF-GTMO)]]
+
| publisher=[[Wikipedia:The Wire (JTF-GTMO)]]
| author=[[Shanita Simmons]]
+
| author=[[Wikipedia:Shanita Simmons]]
 
| date=Friday January 4, 2008
 
| date=Friday January 4, 2008
 
| accessdate=2008-02-10
 
| accessdate=2008-02-10
Line 13: Line 13:
 
</ref>
 
</ref>
  
The teams are controversial because some critics consider their participation in what is called [[enhanced interrogation]] of detainees in the [[war on terror]] a breach of [[medical ethics]].<ref name=VanityFair>
+
The teams are controversial because some critics consider their participation in what is called [[enhanced interrogation]] [[Wikipedia:enhanced interrogation|(WP)]] of detainees a breach of [[Wikipedia:medical ethics|medical ethics]].<ref name=VanityFair>
 
{{cite news
 
{{cite news
 
| url=http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2007/07/torture200707?printable=true&amp;currentPage=all
 
| url=http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2007/07/torture200707?printable=true&amp;currentPage=all
Line 19: Line 19:
 
| page=
 
| page=
 
| pages=
 
| pages=
| publisher=[[Vanity Fair magazine]]
+
| publisher=[[Wikipedia:Vanity Fair magazine]]
| author=[[Katherine Eban]]
+
| author=[[Wikipedia:Katherine Eban]]
 
| date=July 17, 2007
 
| date=July 17, 2007
 
| accessdate=2008-03-02
 
| accessdate=2008-03-02
 
| quote=
 
| quote=
 
}}</ref>
 
}}</ref>
Such was the consternation of the [[American Psychological Association]] that it released the "Reaffirmation of the American Psychological Association Position Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment and Its Application to Individuals Defined in the United States Code as “Enemy Combatants"  
+
Such was the consternation of the [[Wikipedia:American Psychological Association|American Psychological Association]] that it released the "Reaffirmation of the American Psychological Association Position Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment and Its Application to Individuals Defined in the United States Code as “Enemy Combatants"  
to make clear that any [[torture]] and other cruel, Inhuman, or degrading treatment was unethical, whatever the situation.<ref name=Apa20070819>
+
to make clear that any [[torture]] [[Wikipedia:torture|(WP)]] and other cruel, Inhuman, or degrading treatment was unethical, whatever the situation.<ref name=Apa20070819>
 
{{cite news
 
{{cite news
 
| url=http://www.apa.org/governance/resolutions/notorture0807.html
 
| url=http://www.apa.org/governance/resolutions/notorture0807.html
Line 32: Line 32:
 
| page=
 
| page=
 
| pages=
 
| pages=
| publisher=[[American Psychological Association]]
+
| publisher=[[Wikipedia:American Psychological Association]]
 
| author=
 
| author=
 
| date=August 19, 2007
 
| date=August 19, 2007
 
| accessdate=2008-03-02
 
| accessdate=2008-03-02
 
| quote=
 
| quote=
}}</ref>  
+
}}</ref>
 +
 
 +
As always, the phrase '[[war on terror]]' [[Wikipedia:war on terror|(WP)]] is invoked, attempting to justify what were unthinkable means even as far back as the Second World War, when the phrase used to squelch [[Wikipedia:dissent|dissent]] against the war was, "don't you know there's a war on?". The original phrase makes a comeback occasionally; <ref>http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/campaigns/our_boys/2611351/Dont-you-know-theres-a-bloody-war-on.html Pro-war sentiments from The Sun featuring the phrase as title</ref>
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==
*[[John Leso]]
+
* [[Wikipedia:Wikisource:Hard work of BSCT validated by peers]]
*[[Larry C. James]]
+
* [[Unethical medical experiments in the United States]]
* Unethical medical experiments in the United States
+
* [[MKULTRA]]
* MKULTRA
+
* [[Unit 731]]
* Unit 731
+
* [[War Crimes]]
* War Crimes
+
* [[Wikipedia:John Leso]]
 +
* [[Wikipedia:Larry C. James]]
 +
* [[Wikipedia:Unethical medical experiments in the United States]]
 +
* [[Wikipedia:MKULTRA]]
 +
* [[Wikipedia:Unit 731]]
 +
* [[Wikipedia:War Crimes]]
 +
 
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
 +
Transferred to Anarchopedia by the author, Geo Swan, originally writing on Wikipedia

Latest revision as of 23:59, 23 September 2012

Guantanamo guards receiving a Behavioral Science briefing

The US Department of Defense (WP) authorized Behavioral Science Consultation Teams to study the detainees it holds in extrajudicial detention (WP).[1]

The teams are controversial because some critics consider their participation in what is called enhanced interrogation (WP) of detainees a breach of medical ethics.[2] Such was the consternation of the American Psychological Association that it released the "Reaffirmation of the American Psychological Association Position Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment and Its Application to Individuals Defined in the United States Code as “Enemy Combatants" to make clear that any torture (WP) and other cruel, Inhuman, or degrading treatment was unethical, whatever the situation.[3]

As always, the phrase 'war on terror' (WP) is invoked, attempting to justify what were unthinkable means even as far back as the Second World War, when the phrase used to squelch dissent against the war was, "don't you know there's a war on?". The original phrase makes a comeback occasionally; [4]

See also[edit]


References[edit]

  1. Wikipedia:Shanita Simmons (Friday January 4, 2008). "Hard work of BSCT validated by peers". Wikipedia:The Wire (JTF-GTMO). p. 4. http://www.jtfgtmo.southcom.mil/wire/wire/WirePDF/v8/Issue48v8.pdf#page=4. Retrieved 2008-02-10. mirror </li>
  2. Wikipedia:Katherine Eban (July 17, 2007). "The War on Terror: Rorschach and Awe". Wikipedia:Vanity Fair magazine. http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2007/07/torture200707?printable=true&currentPage=all. Retrieved 2008-03-02. </li>
  3. "Reaffirmation of the American Psychological Association Position Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment and Its Application to Individuals Defined in the United States Code as “Enemy Combatants”". Wikipedia:American Psychological Association. August 19, 2007. http://www.apa.org/governance/resolutions/notorture0807.html. Retrieved 2008-03-02. </li>
  4. http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/campaigns/our_boys/2611351/Dont-you-know-theres-a-bloody-war-on.html Pro-war sentiments from The Sun featuring the phrase as title
  5. </ol>

Transferred to Anarchopedia by the author, Geo Swan, originally writing on Wikipedia