Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.
User:Anarchangel/Wikipedia argument of the month
From Anarchopedia
Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Astronomical predictions for the 19th century Precis: article titles are not legal documents. They do not have to avoid loopholes, ie, they may say equivocal things. It is up to the reader to discern the true meaning, which this nominator failed to do, or ignored.
- "Really, you can't have predictions from something that happened in the past" (that is the entire nomination)
Dishonorable mention:
Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of zero terms Precis: It is 2008 again, and there is no such thing as Wikipedia:WP:IDONTLIKEIT or WP:VAGUEWAVE (mostly the first, because vagueness and dittoing never really went away)
