Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.

Corporate violations purchasing

From Anarchopedia
Revision as of 00:06, 11 February 2011 by Anarchangel (Talk | contribs) (AP ED Start)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Anarchy-symbol.svg This article has been edited by Anarchopedians, and to that extent represents Anarchopedia's
philosophy. While it may at first seem less than subtle, what is printed elsewhere is the extreme
You are welcomed to adjust your perception of Normality
AP
ED

Corporations, due to their social and legal structure, are often even less ethical than those who run them, and they seek the cheapest option without regard to ethics in almost all cases. Paying fines for violations of law and procedure is often cheaper than conforming to these laws and rules.

Conservation organizations are increasingly run by lefties who prefer compromise to opposition, and with some good reason, given opposition's track record. But the recent strategy of attempting to conform conservation legislation with business' interest, quite apart from setting up a standard of ecological violation, has played right into the unethical business strategy of corporations: paying for violations. Corporations can now exceed pollution standards legally, and pay for it as they always have, with no negative news impact to upset investors.