Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.
Combatant Status Review Tribunal
One of the criteria for holding and not releasing the hostages is commitment; the one thing that a faithful Muslim cannot deny
Releasing prisoners is more in line with a commitment to humanitarian treatment. It is what was done with Nazis in WWII and there is no end to the war in Afghanistan and Iraq, it is an occupation.
Holding them as prisoner for a long period makes it more likely they will fight to the death. To say that is ok is not only unethical, but ignores how much more dangerous such a person is. Regardless of whether one cares, it shows the extent to which the US has gone, to put their troops and thus their military strategy at a disadvantage, simply to hold the prisoners.
- Detention, Treatment, and Trial of Certain Non-Citizens in the War Against Terrorism Wikisource
- Declaration of Stephen Abraham, Lieutenant Colonel, United States Army Reserve, June 14th, 2007
- Guantanamo Detainees (02/13/2004)
The Combatant Status Review Tribunals (CSRT) were a set of Wikipedia:tribunals for confirming whether Wikipedia:detainees held by the Wikipedia:United States at the Wikipedia:Guantanamo Bay detention camp had been correctly designated as "Wikipedia:enemy combatants". The CSRTs were established July 7, 2004 by order of U.S. Deputy Secretary of Defense Wikipedia:Paul Wolfowitz[4] after U.S. Supreme Court rulings in Wikipedia:Hamdi v. Rumsfeld[5] and Wikipedia:Rasul v. Bush Combatant Status Review Tribunal (fact sheet of October 17, 2006)Wikisource link and were coordinated through the Wikipedia:Office for the Administrative Review of the Detention of Enemy Combatants.
These non-public hearings were conducted as "a formal review of all the information related to a detainee to determine whether each person meets the criteria to be designated as an enemy combatant."[6] The first CSRT hearings began in July 2004. Redacted transcripts of hearings for "high value detainees" were posted to the Department of Defense (DoD) website.[7] As of October 30, 2007, fourteen CSRT transcripts were available on the DoD website.
Citations
- ↑ Guantánamo Prisoners Getting Their Day, but Hardly in Court, New York Times, November 11, 2004 - mirror
- ↑ Inside the Guantánamo Bay hearings: Barbarian "Justice" dispensed by KGB-style "military tribunals", Financial Times, December 11, 2004
- ↑ Annual Administrative Review Boards for Enemy Combatants Held at Guantanamo Attributable to Senior Defense Officials. United States Department of Defense. URL accessed on 2007-09-22.
- ↑ Department of Defense: Order Establishing Combatant Status Review Tribunals (PDF), signed by Paul Wolfowitz. See also News Release by Department of Defense Public Affairs Office.
- ↑ Full text of Justice O'Connor's opinion. Wikipedia:Free Access to Law Movement. URL accessed on 2007-09-24.
- ↑ "Guantanamo Detainee Processes" (PDF). Wikipedia:United States Department of Defense. October 2, 2007. http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Sep2005/d20050908process.pdf. Retrieved 2007-11-11.
</li>
- ↑ "Combatant Status Review Tribunals/Administrative Review Boards Special Interest Items". Wikipedia:United States Department of Defense. (archive 2006, 2007). http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Combatant_Tribunals.html. Retrieved 2007-11-11. </li> </ol>