User talk:Vanzetti

The Anarchopedia collective welcomes every new editor, who has a serious interest in anarchism and improving the Anarchopedia. But what we won't accept are people who vandalise this project.

Are there any particular reasons for the deletion of content in this article: http://eng.anarchopedia.org/index.php?title=Present_and_Historical_Anarchist_Organizations&diff=40939&oldid=40587

Until now your behavior looks to me more like vandalism...

--Maly Krtek 09:56, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

I know I should probably keep myself to minor edits from now on until i get the hang of the wiki system.

To me those passages were just poor transcriptions of wikipedia articles and I had deleted them with the intention of replacing them with slightly modified versions of the wikipedia passages.

I work very slowly because i'm trying to get the hang of the system.

sorry.

---

Welcome and sorry if i was that harsh to you, it's just that the Anarchopedia is oftener under attack of vandals... You don't need to worry about that you could destroy an article, it's at any time possible to undo edits. If you want to try things out use the sandbox. If you have any questions/problems or just want to talk u can join the Anarchopedia chat: #anarchopedia @ irc.indymedia.org.

Well I consider the first passage here as relevant. I just think it's usefull to point out that anarchy doesn't means chaos like it's for example now used by the mainstream media if they report about Somalia. --Maly Krtek 02:07, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi David

You don't need an authorization to edit the article about the Spanish Revolution. Btw it's one of the numerous Wikipedia clones, which you can realise by the mass of red links in it. The English Anarchopedia has in my oppinion more quantity than quality, what is also caused by a lack in native English speakers. As a native Germon speaker I also know the Germon Anarchopedia, which is better developed, has less Wikipedia clones and more active users as this one. Well I would like if the English Anarchopedia would follow this direction. Also I agree with you about what you wrote on the Anarchopedia, but I have to point out it isn't a consensus that the English Anarchopedia becomes a general encyclopedia. I also prefer to have an encyclopedia about anarchism (like for example the Germon Anarchopedia already is one) as I think that there are already enough general encyclopedias. But the English Anarchopedia has users who argue with defending the freedom of speech and against censorship and consider this encyclopedia more in the way that it should be a place there every topic is welcomed, what unfortunately already resulted in several articles copied from the BoyWiki (a wiki that was runned by paedophiles)... --Maly Krtek 10:50, 5 September 2009 (UTC)