Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.

Difference between revisions of "Anarchopedia:Truth"

From Anarchopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Links)
(Note)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
Links are fine, but they are no guarantee of any truth at all; Wikipedia editors increasingly defend what they <u>know</u> to be untrue with the Notability rule
 
Links are fine, but they are no guarantee of any truth at all; Wikipedia editors increasingly defend what they <u>know</u> to be untrue with the Notability rule
 +
 +
Note that this is not mutually exclusive to [[Anarchopedia:Subjective]]. Subjectivity is assumed to exist at the edges of what has been defined as Truth.
  
  

Revision as of 02:51, 12 July 2012

Shortcuts: A:Truth, A:T. Anarchopedia:T redirects here

Anarchopedia will endeavor to communicate the truth, first and foremost. Anger is understandable, and can be moving, but it is not intellectually convincing and should be avoided; however, it should never be replaced by the insipid or the disingenuous or the propagandized.

Links are fine, but they are no guarantee of any truth at all; Wikipedia editors increasingly defend what they know to be untrue with the Notability rule

Note that this is not mutually exclusive to Anarchopedia:Subjective. Subjectivity is assumed to exist at the edges of what has been defined as Truth.


Balance

shortcut A:T#B

"Balance" is to be avoided; a lie is not the other side of the truth, and the chances are infinitely small that both sides of an argument are of exactly equal worth. If an article is exactly balanced, something is probably wrong with it

Balance with reference to Utility; while Truth is of uppermost importance, Balance is preferred; mostly because of Justice but Completeness is almost as important a rationale in this case

Point of View

Main article: Anarchopedia:POV

shortcut A:POV

  • Most thinking is skewed; one of the ways this is achieved is to propose Point of View as a relative thing.
  • The best ideas have less probability of being shared by the majority.
  • One of the supports for the idea of PoV is the assumption of bias; this amounts to nothing more than "You would say that" (Tu Quoque). Obviously we want more people to learn more faster, but we should not be surprised if the people who most want to learn are those with the most vested interest.

See also