Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.
Difference between revisions of "Søren Kierkegaard and Friedrich Nietzsche"
Anarchangel (Talk | contribs) (WP+NODEL Start) |
Anarchangel (Talk | contribs) (Link Fix) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | [[Wikipedia:Georg Brandes]], a Danish philosopher, wrote to '''[[Wikipedia:Friedrich Nietzsche]]''' (1844–1900) in 1888 asking him to study the works of '''[[Wikipedia:Søren Kierkegaard]]''' (1813–1855), to which Nietzsche replied that he would.<ref>[http://www.dartmouth.edu/~fnchron/1888.html Nietzsche Chronicle: 1888]</ref> Nietzsche seems to have been unable to undertake this task before his mental collapse in 1889.<ref name=Angier>Angier, Tom P. ''Either Kierkegaard/or Nietzsche: Moral Philosophy in a New Key''. ISBN 0754654745</ref><ref>Hubben, William. ''Dostoevsky, Kierkegaard, Nietzsche and Kafka''. ISBN 0684825899</ref> | + | [[Georg Brandes]] [[Wikipedia:Georg Brandes|(WP)]], a Danish philosopher, wrote to [[Friedrich Nietzsche]] '''[[Wikipedia:Friedrich Nietzsche|(WP)]]''' (1844–1900) in 1888 asking him to study the works of [[Søren Kierkegaard]] '''[[Wikipedia:Søren Kierkegaard|(WP)]]''' (1813–1855), to which Nietzsche replied that he would.<ref>[http://www.dartmouth.edu/~fnchron/1888.html Nietzsche Chronicle: 1888]</ref> Nietzsche seems to have been unable to undertake this task before his mental collapse in 1889.<ref name=Angier>Angier, Tom P. ''Either Kierkegaard/or Nietzsche: Moral Philosophy in a New Key''. ISBN 0754654745</ref><ref>Hubben, William. ''Dostoevsky, Kierkegaard, Nietzsche and Kafka''. ISBN 0684825899</ref> |
Recent research however suggests that Nietzsche ''was'' exposed to the works of Kierkegaard, through secondary literature. Aside from Brandes, Nietzsche owned and read a copy of [[Wikipedia:Hans Lassen Martensen]]’s ''Christliche Ethik'' (1873) in which Martensen extensively quoted and wrote about Kierkegaard’s individualism in [[ethics]] [[Wikipedia:ethics|(WP)]] and [[religion]] [[Wikipedia:religion|(WP)]]. Nietzsche also read [[Wikipedia:Harald Høffding]]’s ''Psychologie in Umrissen auf Grundlage der Erfahrung (ed. 1887)'' which expounded and critiqued Kierkegaard’s psychology. Thomas Brobjer believes one of the works Nietzsche wrote about Kierkegaard is in ''Morgenröthe'', which was partly written in response to Martensen's work. In one of the passages, Nietzsche wrote: ''Those moralists, on the other hand, who, following in the footsteps of [[Wikipedia:Socrates]], offer the individual a morality of self-control and temperance as a means to his own advantage, as his personal key to happiness, are the exceptions.'' Brobjer believes Kierkegaard is one of "those moralists".<ref>[http://muse.jhu.edu/cgi-bin/access.cgi?uri=/journals/journal_of_the_history_of_philosophy/v041/41.2brobjer.html ''Journal of the History of Philosophy'']</ref> | Recent research however suggests that Nietzsche ''was'' exposed to the works of Kierkegaard, through secondary literature. Aside from Brandes, Nietzsche owned and read a copy of [[Wikipedia:Hans Lassen Martensen]]’s ''Christliche Ethik'' (1873) in which Martensen extensively quoted and wrote about Kierkegaard’s individualism in [[ethics]] [[Wikipedia:ethics|(WP)]] and [[religion]] [[Wikipedia:religion|(WP)]]. Nietzsche also read [[Wikipedia:Harald Høffding]]’s ''Psychologie in Umrissen auf Grundlage der Erfahrung (ed. 1887)'' which expounded and critiqued Kierkegaard’s psychology. Thomas Brobjer believes one of the works Nietzsche wrote about Kierkegaard is in ''Morgenröthe'', which was partly written in response to Martensen's work. In one of the passages, Nietzsche wrote: ''Those moralists, on the other hand, who, following in the footsteps of [[Wikipedia:Socrates]], offer the individual a morality of self-control and temperance as a means to his own advantage, as his personal key to happiness, are the exceptions.'' Brobjer believes Kierkegaard is one of "those moralists".<ref>[http://muse.jhu.edu/cgi-bin/access.cgi?uri=/journals/journal_of_the_history_of_philosophy/v041/41.2brobjer.html ''Journal of the History of Philosophy'']</ref> | ||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
{{reflist|2}} | {{reflist|2}} | ||
{{Kierkegaard}}{{Nietzsche}} | {{Kierkegaard}}{{Nietzsche}} | ||
| − | [[Category:Existentialism]][[Category:Friedrich Nietzsche]][[Category:Søren Kierkegaard]][[Category:Philosophy comparisons]][[Category:Existentialists]] | + | [[Category:Existentialism]][[Category:Friedrich Nietzsche]][[Category:Søren Kierkegaard]][[Category:Philosophy comparisons]][[Category:Existentialists]][[Category:Articles nominated for deletion on Wikipedia (AfD)]] |
[[it:Influenza di Kierkeegaard su Nietzsche]][[ko:ì‡ ë Œ í‚¤ë¥´ì¼€ê³ ë¥´ì™€ 프리드리히 니체]] | [[it:Influenza di Kierkeegaard su Nietzsche]][[ko:ì‡ ë Œ í‚¤ë¥´ì¼€ê³ ë¥´ì™€ 프리드리히 니체]] | ||
Latest revision as of 03:12, 13 February 2011
Georg Brandes (WP), a Danish philosopher, wrote to Friedrich Nietzsche (WP) (1844–1900) in 1888 asking him to study the works of Søren Kierkegaard (WP) (1813–1855), to which Nietzsche replied that he would.[1] Nietzsche seems to have been unable to undertake this task before his mental collapse in 1889.[2][3]
Recent research however suggests that Nietzsche was exposed to the works of Kierkegaard, through secondary literature. Aside from Brandes, Nietzsche owned and read a copy of Wikipedia:Hans Lassen Martensen’s Christliche Ethik (1873) in which Martensen extensively quoted and wrote about Kierkegaard’s individualism in ethics (WP) and religion (WP). Nietzsche also read Wikipedia:Harald Høffding’s Psychologie in Umrissen auf Grundlage der Erfahrung (ed. 1887) which expounded and critiqued Kierkegaard’s psychology. Thomas Brobjer believes one of the works Nietzsche wrote about Kierkegaard is in Morgenröthe, which was partly written in response to Martensen's work. In one of the passages, Nietzsche wrote: Those moralists, on the other hand, who, following in the footsteps of Wikipedia:Socrates, offer the individual a morality of self-control and temperance as a means to his own advantage, as his personal key to happiness, are the exceptions. Brobjer believes Kierkegaard is one of "those moralists".[4]
Both Kierkegaard and Nietzsche, considered precursors to Wikipedia:existentialism (or existentialists themselves), criticized the rational, idealistic, and systematic structures of philosophy. Both philosophers wrote in a fairly unsystematic way and with similar literary style.[2]
They attacked what they saw as the detrimental effect of the establishment of Wikipedia:Christendom (roughly, the Christian Church) on the population, but differed in their views about Christian belief, or at least religion.
| This article contains content from Wikipedia An article on this subject has been nominated for deletion on Wikipedia: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ Søren Kierkegaard and Friedrich Nietzsche Current versions of the GNU FDL article on WP may contain information useful to the improvement of this article |
WP+ NO DEL |
Points of comparison[edit]
Throughout the 20th century (and into the 21st century), there have been growing studies of Kierkegaardian-Nietzschean comparisons. The most prominent early scholars who studied this aspect of the two philosophers include Wikipedia:Georg Brandes, Wikipedia:Karl Jaspers, Wikipedia:Jean-Paul Sartre, and Wikipedia:Karl Löwith.
Both Kierkegaard and Nietzsche, considered precursors to Wikipedia:existentialism (or existentialists themselves), criticized the rational, idealistic, and systematic structures of philosophy. Both philosophers wrote in a fairly unsystematic way and with similar literary style.[2]
J. Kellenberger in his work Kierkegaard and Nietzsche, identified major points of comparison:
- The similarities of their lives, for example:
- Kierkegaard's fiancée Wikipedia:Regine Olsen and Nietzsche's companion Wikipedia:Lou Andreas-Salomé
- Intense writing periods where both authors turned out a book a year: (Kierkegaard: 1843-1850; Nietzsche 1878-1888)
- Kierkegaard and Nietzsche's passion for life and philosophy
- Kierkegaard's Wikipedia:knight of faith and Nietzsche's Wikipedia:Ãœbermensch
- Kierkegaard and Nietzsche's common focus on psychology (Kierkegaard's faith-based psychology - Nietzsche's power-based psychology)
- Kierkegaard and Nietzsche's common focus on religion (Kierkegaard's embrace of religion - Nietzsche's rejection of religion)
- Kierkegaard's writings on Wikipedia:Abraham in Wikipedia:Fear and Trembling and Nietzsche's character of Wikipedia:Zarathustra in Wikipedia:Thus Spoke Zarathustra
- Kierkegaard's joyfulness of faith and Nietzsche's joyful acceptance of life
- Kierkegaard's "crowd" and Nietzsche's "herd"
Kierkegaard and Nietzsche condemned Christian churches for perverting Wikipedia:Christianity, but they differ in their view of whether religion can continue to play an important part in an individual's life. Kierkegaard believed that Christian belief and faith is a much more individualistic and personal experience, filled with dread and joy, than is afforded by the comfortable social gathering of Christendom, while Nietzsche believed Christians were attached to Christianity (which Nietzsche saw as a decadent religion) in order to compensate for their individual weaknesses.
See also[edit]
References[edit]
- Either Kierkegaard/or Nietzsche: Moral Philosophy in a New Key by Tom P. Angier (Ashgate Publishing, 2006).
- Four Prophets of our Destiny: Dostoevsky, Kierkegaard, Nietzsche and Kafka by William Hubben (Textbook, 2003).
- Kierkegaard and Nietzsche by J. Kellenberger (St. Martin's Press Inc, 1997).
- Notes and Discussions: Nietzsche's Knowledge of Kierkegaard by Thomas H. Brobjer. Journal of the History of Philosophy - Volume 41, Number 2, April 2003, pp. 251-263
- Reason and Existenz by Karl Jaspers (Marquette University Press, 1996, ISBN 0-87462-611-0).
Notes[edit]
- ↑ Nietzsche Chronicle: 1888
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Angier, Tom P. Either Kierkegaard/or Nietzsche: Moral Philosophy in a New Key. ISBN 0754654745
- ↑ Hubben, William. Dostoevsky, Kierkegaard, Nietzsche and Kafka. ISBN 0684825899
- ↑ Journal of the History of Philosophy
