Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.

Difference between revisions of "comparison between DSDM and XP testing"

From Anarchopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(nn)
Line 1: Line 1:
This article will compare and contrast [[Dynamic Systems Development Method|DSDM]] and [[Extreme Programming|XP]] [[software testing]].
+
nn
 
+
==DSDM==
+
Principles (J Stapleton, ''DSDM business focused development, 2nd ed. 2003):
+
4. Fitness for business purpose is the essential criterion for acceptance of deliverables.
+
8. Testing is integrated throughout the lifecycle.
+
 
+
* {{ll|Unit test}}s are prioritised in accordance with [[Risk Based Testing]].
+
* Testing is done at the end of each phase/iteration. (see: [[Dynamic Systems Development Method|DSDM]] lifecycle)
+
 
+
==XP==
+
* Fully integrated testing.
+
* Continuous integration.
+
* Write test first, code to pass the test.
+
 
+
* Extreme programming achieves 100% code coverage through coding only to pass the tests.
+
 
+
==Simmilarities==
+
In both frameworks:
+
* Tests are repeatable.
+
* Customer validation is the key
+
 
+
 
+
[[Category:Software testing]]
+
[[Category:Software design methodologies]]
+

Revision as of 02:47, 20 November 2008

nn