Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.
Difference between revisions of "Free culture"
m |
m (Robot: Changing template: quote) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
The free culture movement takes the ideals of [[free software movement]] and extends them from the field of [[software]] to all [[cultural]] and creative works. At the beginning, [[Richard Stallman]] (founder of the [[Free Software Foundation]] and the [[free software]] movement) supported the Creative Commons, but at some point he rejected it: | The free culture movement takes the ideals of [[free software movement]] and extends them from the field of [[software]] to all [[cultural]] and creative works. At the beginning, [[Richard Stallman]] (founder of the [[Free Software Foundation]] and the [[free software]] movement) supported the Creative Commons, but at some point he rejected it: | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{quotation|I no longer endorse Creative Commons. I cannot endorse Creative Commons as a whole, because some of its licenses are unacceptable. It would be self-delusion to try to endorse just some of the Creative Commons licenses, because people lump them together; they will misconstrue any endorsement of some as a blanket endorsement of all. I therefore find myself constrained to reject Creative Commons entirely.<ref>[http://web.archive.org/web/20060222104211/http://www.linuxp2p.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=10771 interview for LinuxP2P] (6 february 2006)</ref>}} |
=== Wikimedia === | === Wikimedia === | ||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
Former board member and trustee [[Tim Shell]], however, suggests that the Wikimedia Foundation's use of free content was not meant to be an ideological position: | Former board member and trustee [[Tim Shell]], however, suggests that the Wikimedia Foundation's use of free content was not meant to be an ideological position: | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{quotation|For example, should we have an official position on the free culture movement? Wikimedia is part of that movement, but I would say this is so because of practical considerations, rather than ideological ones. It was assumed that people would be more willing to contribute to Wikipedia if they knew their work could not be seized and owned by someone else, and it was decided that all contributions would be licensed accordingly.<ref>{{cite web |
| url = http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:TimShell | | url = http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:TimShell | ||
| title = Should we be value-neutral outside the scope of our essential mission? | | title = Should we be value-neutral outside the scope of our essential mission? | ||
Revision as of 11:08, 11 November 2008
Free Culture is a social movement that promotes the freedom to distribute and modify creative works, using the Internet as well as other media.
The movement objects to overly restrictive copyright laws, or completely reject the concepts of copyright and intellectual property, which many members of the movement also argue hinder creativity. They call this system "permission culture". Common free-culture practices are online collaboration, collaborative editing and collaborative learning. Free-culture idealists also want quality education to be accessible to all.
See also: copyleft, infosocialism, infoanarchism.
Contents
Organizations
The organization commonly associated with free culture is Creative Commons (CC), founded by Lawrence Lessig. Lessig is a law professor at Stanford University and a prominent figure in the free software movement. He wrote a book called Free Culture, which provides many arguments in favor of the free culture movement.
The student organization FreeCulture.org is sometimes confusingly called "the Free Culture Movement," but that is not its official name. The organization is a subset of the greater movement.
Free Software Foundation
The free culture movement takes the ideals of free software movement and extends them from the field of software to all cultural and creative works. At the beginning, Richard Stallman (founder of the Free Software Foundation and the free software movement) supported the Creative Commons, but at some point he rejected it:
I no longer endorse Creative Commons. I cannot endorse Creative Commons as a whole, because some of its licenses are unacceptable. It would be self-delusion to try to endorse just some of the Creative Commons licenses, because people lump them together; they will misconstrue any endorsement of some as a blanket endorsement of all. I therefore find myself constrained to reject Creative Commons entirely.[1]
Wikimedia
Wikimedia's projects, such as the popular Wikipedia, which are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License and different Creative Commons licences, arguably constitute the largest single free culture project.
Based on ideas of the free culture movement, Wikimedia founder Jimmy Wales also has announced ten challenges for the movement in general with A Free Culture Manifesto at the Wikimania 2005.
According to Jimmy Wales, those 10 things that should be free within the next decade are:
- Encyclopedia — in all languages; Wikipedia
- Dictionary — in and for all languages; Wiktionary
- Curriculum — in every language and for every grade; Wikibooks, Wikiversity
- Music — Wikimedia Commons
- Art — Wikimedia Commons
- Free file formats
- Maps — Wikimedia Commons
- Product identifiers
- TV listings
- Communities
Former board member and trustee Tim Shell, however, suggests that the Wikimedia Foundation's use of free content was not meant to be an ideological position:
For example, should we have an official position on the free culture movement? Wikimedia is part of that movement, but I would say this is so because of practical considerations, rather than ideological ones. It was assumed that people would be more willing to contribute to Wikipedia if they knew their work could not be seized and owned by someone else, and it was decided that all contributions would be licensed accordingly.[2]
See also
- Cultural environmentalism
- FreeCulture.org
- Open educational resources
- Gratis versus Libre (free as in beer)
References
- ↑ interview for LinuxP2P (6 february 2006)
- ↑ Shell, Tim Should we be value-neutral outside the scope of our essential mission?. Wikimedia Meta-wiki. URL accessed on 2007-09-19.
External links
- Resources
- Berry, David M. and Giles Moss. 2006. The Politics of the Libre Commons. First Monday. Volume 11 (September)
- Videoblog: Free Culture, Free Software, Free Infrastructures! Openness and Freedom in every Layer of the Network (Interviews with Kloschi (Freifunk), Kurt Jansson (Wikimedia), Jürgen Neumann (Freifunk), Rishab Aiyer Ghosh (United Nations University), Lawrence Lessig (Creative Commons) and Allison and Benoit (Montréal Wireless))
- Organisations
- Libervis.com is a project of building and promoting a free culture community online.
| This article contains content from Wikipedia. Current versions of the GNU FDL article Free_Culture_movement on WP may contain information useful to the improvement of this article | WP |
