Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.
Difference between revisions of "Template talk:spoilers"
From Anarchopedia
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
::: OK, OK. However, I still think that it is paternalistic to suppose what others would like and to protect them on such presumptions. As I am inside of these "others", I may clearly say that I am felt frustrated because of such things. Also, this should be some kind of sum of rational knowledge (at least, this template is used for articles which present rational knowledge). And if someone comes here, (s)he has to expect rational knowledge here, which assumes that art pieces will be rationally described. Expecting that someone worn you about such thing is consumeristic ;) --[[User:Millosh|Millosh]] 12:05, 21 August 2007 (UTC) | ::: OK, OK. However, I still think that it is paternalistic to suppose what others would like and to protect them on such presumptions. As I am inside of these "others", I may clearly say that I am felt frustrated because of such things. Also, this should be some kind of sum of rational knowledge (at least, this template is used for articles which present rational knowledge). And if someone comes here, (s)he has to expect rational knowledge here, which assumes that art pieces will be rationally described. Expecting that someone worn you about such thing is consumeristic ;) --[[User:Millosh|Millosh]] 12:05, 21 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
| − | ::: Whatever, I just had to say that I am against such templates :) --[[User:Millosh|Millosh]] 12:05, 21 August 2007 (UTC) | + | ::: Whatever, I just had to say that I am against such templates and why it is so :) --[[User:Millosh|Millosh]] 12:05, 21 August 2007 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 12:05, 21 August 2007
I think that this kind of templates are paternalistic. It was introduced on English Wikipedia, copied on other Wikipedias, but then removed from English Wikipedia. I think that we shouldn't have such templates. (I know that Popperipopp has the best intentions, but... At least, we should talk about this.) --Millosh 15:39, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- I don't mind if you delete it. I just saw it in an article and created it. Just of curiosity, in what way do you think they are paternalistic? People probably prefers to be noticed about that sort of stuff beforehand, don't you think? --Popperipopp 20:49, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- OK, OK. However, I still think that it is paternalistic to suppose what others would like and to protect them on such presumptions. As I am inside of these "others", I may clearly say that I am felt frustrated because of such things. Also, this should be some kind of sum of rational knowledge (at least, this template is used for articles which present rational knowledge). And if someone comes here, (s)he has to expect rational knowledge here, which assumes that art pieces will be rationally described. Expecting that someone worn you about such thing is consumeristic ;) --Millosh 12:05, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Whatever, I just had to say that I am against such templates and why it is so :) --Millosh 12:05, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
