Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.
Difference between revisions of "comparison between DSDM and XP testing"
From Anarchopedia
m (Reverted edits by 64.247.69.74 (Talk) to last version by Beta M) |
|
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 09:29, 20 November 2008
This article will compare and contrast DSDM and XP software testing.
DSDM[edit]
Principles (J Stapleton, DSDM business focused development, 2nd ed. 2003): 4. Fitness for business purpose is the essential criterion for acceptance of deliverables. 8. Testing is integrated throughout the lifecycle.
- Unit tests are prioritised in accordance with Risk Based Testing.
- Testing is done at the end of each phase/iteration. (see: DSDM lifecycle)
XP[edit]
- Fully integrated testing.
- Continuous integration.
- Write test first, code to pass the test.
- Extreme programming achieves 100% code coverage through coding only to pass the tests.
Simmilarities[edit]
In both frameworks:
- Tests are repeatable.
- Customer validation is the key
