Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.
Difference between revisions of "Mihail Alexandrovich Bakunin"
From Anarchopedia
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | In "Anarchism", by Daniel Guerin (Monthly Review Press, 1970), page 4, Guerin states, "The relative unity of [[Social Anarchism]] arises from the fact that it was developed during a single period by two masters, one of whom was a disciple of the other: the Frenchman [[Pierre-Joseph Proudhon]] (1809-1865) and the Russian exile [[Mikhail Bakunin]] (1814-1876). The latter defined [[anarchism]] as 'Proudhonism greatly developed and pushed to its furthest conclusion'. This type of anarchism called itself collectivist". | + | In "Anarchism", by Daniel Guerin (Monthly Review Press, 1970), page 4, Guerin states, "The relative unity of [[Social Anarchism (site)|social anarchism]] arises from the fact that it was developed during a single period by two masters, one of whom was a disciple of the other: the Frenchman [[Pierre-Joseph Proudhon]] (1809-1865) and the Russian exile [[Mikhail Bakunin]] (1814-1876). The latter defined [[anarchism]] as 'Proudhonism greatly developed and pushed to its furthest conclusion'. This type of anarchism called itself collectivist". |
Revision as of 02:36, 14 March 2005
In "Anarchism", by Daniel Guerin (Monthly Review Press, 1970), page 4, Guerin states, "The relative unity of social anarchism arises from the fact that it was developed during a single period by two masters, one of whom was a disciple of the other: the Frenchman Pierre-Joseph Proudhon (1809-1865) and the Russian exile Mikhail Bakunin (1814-1876). The latter defined anarchism as 'Proudhonism greatly developed and pushed to its furthest conclusion'. This type of anarchism called itself collectivist".
