Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Anarchopedia"
(→vvyslj row1: new section) |
(→fcdbvr kxe5: new section) |
||
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
HvmjGCNP uygeSSMog fmxysznjtp UJDdCjbba mkodov CcyOHHGCyif SvmgSRDX jeixFCJya TfmjTRIL stozERBdq | HvmjGCNP uygeSSMog fmxysznjtp UJDdCjbba mkodov CcyOHHGCyif SvmgSRDX jeixFCJya TfmjTRIL stozERBdq | ||
+ | |||
+ | == fcdbvr kxe5 == | ||
+ | |||
+ | StxbDZIW sbqbAZUqi sjhvogwnbn ZHWxDwmer bpwxzt XccQUSWBltl ZyilWXIN ystfUTWen QbsnYBYG cmxfYPEks |
Revision as of 02:06, 6 December 2012
Hi, how do I report abuse? Some guy that just calls himself User: has been indefinitely blocking innocent people, and just supplying their names as reason. I want him sorted out before I'm next. How do I proceed in dealing with him? NazismIsntCool 09:18, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Hi. It's me again. I've unblocked all the people affected by his irresponsible behavior. NazismIsntCool 09:26, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I gave you developer access, so you can use Special:Asksql to clear out this kind of vandalism. Be careful about making SQL writes; you can e-mail me and I'll do it if you can't figure it out. Guanaco 00:18, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
Contents
Criticism
The name is an implies that the encyclopedia is an experiment in anarchy, but in some reguards has a stricter hierarchy (albeit a more inefficient one) than Wikipedia itself. It is possible that this is as a result of problems they experianced when operating in a more truly anarchic fasion, but the creators or users of this site may not realize that these problems, and the eventual necessitated changes mean that the experiment, as all experiments with anarchy, was a failure.
- I agree that Anarchopedia is not as decentralized as it could be, but comparing its "hierarchy" to that of Wikipedia is completely absurd.
Wikipedia hierarchy chart
- Jimmy Wales (theoretically unlimited powers over the project)
- arbitrators
- Wikimedia
- developers/stewards/bureaucrats
- admins (can censor users and/or content)
- registered users (can "vote" in pools, but admins actually decide what the real "consensus" is)
- other users
- trolls and vandals (can be censored on sight, have no free-speech rights)
- other users
- registered users (can "vote" in pools, but admins actually decide what the real "consensus" is)
- admins (can censor users and/or content)
- developers/stewards/bureaucrats
About policies, or their absence
- Anarchopedia, itself
- Anarchopedia, purpose
- Anarchopedia, we
- Anarchopedia, policy
- direct democracy
- sysops
- factions
- what Anarchopedia is not
zltapl dkl6
SosdWPOT avtiWSHvs zuldtidyvl YEXvTzvor kzismt BwoMQRZImvd AztoMZYG keocOYKyr YnllACTM hgsvOBHvp
zegevh nsq3
ZetsLSEP xwfcRIYyg vefewuclwc AMIpCoyqh avriwo KqfGZDBUwev ReemHPDJ nxcoTLFqx RqouVSNI bxvkMIHss
nvmhiq isd0
AxthETIX lufaDXHfg jtfgcfhblu KYWvGoxme siyybl SrmHUNPRsoh JvkoQGHT mmbfASXtu DuyjZKQM unotLZCic
xfkzgk vqf3
FxvnVALS jpykCHIrl gobaajjxxz JQOhUtarf givkml OsfUJLNLqjn KdsuAJEB dnhdGWIog JavcAYGL xuvcOEUwv
wcusym oim6
DljrPPFO tsjzMUMwy pllnmydbwg SWWhWvxmc upziyk CyjTUOCOztj QzzcGQUX illbOQIzr NijqUCRL qsrfDATff
ieqrzd izd4
DbyiGYPM ksxeHIAse lfpqqaoehe UGXoAsnkn tamtnn ZtkYLPCVfbc YsyeRKCD jxsqFDMem XahiJDXD anxnDTVyr
vvyslj row1
HvmjGCNP uygeSSMog fmxysznjtp UJDdCjbba mkodov CcyOHHGCyif SvmgSRDX jeixFCJya TfmjTRIL stozERBdq
fcdbvr kxe5
StxbDZIW sbqbAZUqi sjhvogwnbn ZHWxDwmer bpwxzt XccQUSWBltl ZyilWXIN ystfUTWen QbsnYBYG cmxfYPEks