Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.
Difference between revisions of "User:Anarchangel/Wikipedia argument of the month"
From Anarchopedia
Anarchangel (Talk | contribs) (Start) |
Anarchangel (Talk | contribs) (Link Fix) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Dishonorable mention: | Dishonorable mention: | ||
| − | [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of zero terms]] Precis: It is 2008 again, and there is no such thing as [[Wikipedia:WP:IDONTLIKEIT]] or [[WP:VAGUEWAVE]] (mostly the first, because vagueness and dittoing never really went away) | + | [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of zero terms]] Precis: It is 2008 again, and there is no such thing as [[Wikipedia:WP:IDONTLIKEIT]] or [[Wikipedia:WP:VAGUEWAVE]] (mostly the first, because vagueness and dittoing never really went away) |
[[Category:Essays]][[Category:Guides]] | [[Category:Essays]][[Category:Guides]] | ||
Latest revision as of 23:25, 2 August 2012
Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Astronomical predictions for the 19th century Precis: article titles are not legal documents. They do not have to avoid loopholes, ie, they may say equivocal things. It is up to the reader to discern the true meaning, which this nominator failed to do, or ignored.
- "Really, you can't have predictions from something that happened in the past" (that is the entire nomination)
Dishonorable mention:
Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of zero terms Precis: It is 2008 again, and there is no such thing as Wikipedia:WP:IDONTLIKEIT or Wikipedia:WP:VAGUEWAVE (mostly the first, because vagueness and dittoing never really went away)
