Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.
Difference between revisions of "User:Anarchangel/If or until deletion 1"
Anarchangel (Talk | contribs) (...Keeps and deletes) |
Anarchangel (Talk | contribs) (...Resolved. Page history retained) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
| + | =Abu Bakr al Jaziri= | ||
| + | According to the United States Treasury Abu Bakr al Jaziri is the a member of the senior management for the [[Afghan Support Committee]] and the [[Wikipedia:Revival of Islamic Heritage Society]], two organizations designated as terrorist under Executive Order 13224.<ref>[http://www.ustreas.gov/press/releases/po909.htm The Continuing War on Terrorist Assets] Paul O'Neill (January 9, 2002). United States Treasury. Retrieved 2008-03-08. "While portraying themselves as legitimate charitable enterprises, the ASC and RIHS have financed and facilitated terrorism. ASC and RIHS personnel, including Al-Jaziri and Al-Libi, defrauded well-meaning contributors by diverting money donated for widows and orphans to al-Qaida terrorists."</ref> | ||
| − | = | + | == Citations == |
| − | + | {{reflist|2}} | |
| + | [[Category:Libyan people]][[Category:Living people]][[Category:Libyan people stubs]][[Category:Outlawed organizations]] | ||
| − | + | <small> | |
| − | + | All nominators should read and apply [[WP:BEFORE]] before nominating. It is WP policy that they should also use an [[WP:RFC]] for gathering a consensus on an article, but you certainly are not the first to do otherwise. [[WP:DEL]] lacks a list of counter-indications, but I would like to see "Do not nominate an article in order to gather consensus; use RFC instead" on DEL. Unfortunately, RFCs are to public transportation as AfDs are to cars; if everyone used RFCs, they would be faster and more efficient at gathering consensus than AfDs. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
= Tachikawa-ryu = | = Tachikawa-ryu = | ||
| Line 38: | Line 20: | ||
SPA Paranoia: SPA is indistinguishable from the majority of WP editors who make one edit to an article and never edit again This article was created by an SPA and is about a non-notable martial art.<ref>[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ketsugo jujutsu]]</ref> | SPA Paranoia: SPA is indistinguishable from the majority of WP editors who make one edit to an article and never edit again This article was created by an SPA and is about a non-notable martial art.<ref>[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ketsugo jujutsu]]</ref> | ||
| − | = | + | =Sante Kimes = |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sante_Kimes - with this AfD's kind of attitude, WP is probably either sued a lot or will be] In fact, the worst behaviour is in the AfD; the article is relatively speaking, unbiased. 'fleecing'? is the only word that can be replaced, although the summary style is not purely factual. This one is worth keeping not only just for the AfD, but only for the AfD. "Tough crap if it's 'biased' - she's a convicted murderer." Delicious junk food. | [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sante_Kimes - with this AfD's kind of attitude, WP is probably either sued a lot or will be] In fact, the worst behaviour is in the AfD; the article is relatively speaking, unbiased. 'fleecing'? is the only word that can be replaced, although the summary style is not purely factual. This one is worth keeping not only just for the AfD, but only for the AfD. "Tough crap if it's 'biased' - she's a convicted murderer." Delicious junk food. | ||
| − | + | </small> | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
Revision as of 23:41, 4 June 2012
Abu Bakr al Jaziri
According to the United States Treasury Abu Bakr al Jaziri is the a member of the senior management for the Afghan Support Committee and the Wikipedia:Revival of Islamic Heritage Society, two organizations designated as terrorist under Executive Order 13224.[1]
Citations
- ↑ The Continuing War on Terrorist Assets Paul O'Neill (January 9, 2002). United States Treasury. Retrieved 2008-03-08. "While portraying themselves as legitimate charitable enterprises, the ASC and RIHS have financed and facilitated terrorism. ASC and RIHS personnel, including Al-Jaziri and Al-Libi, defrauded well-meaning contributors by diverting money donated for widows and orphans to al-Qaida terrorists."
All nominators should read and apply WP:BEFORE before nominating. It is WP policy that they should also use an WP:RFC for gathering a consensus on an article, but you certainly are not the first to do otherwise. WP:DEL lacks a list of counter-indications, but I would like to see "Do not nominate an article in order to gather consensus; use RFC instead" on DEL. Unfortunately, RFCs are to public transportation as AfDs are to cars; if everyone used RFCs, they would be faster and more efficient at gathering consensus than AfDs.
Tachikawa-ryu
No Consensus, defaults to Keep Tachikawa-ryu Fascinating story. The WP only touches on it. For all the world it is the religion in Vagrant Story, sexual and enlightening, being stamped out by prudish Buddhists, of all people. Just amazing. The Buddhist seachange is a religious counterpart to the Republican slave freers becoming Georgian integration opponents, backwards.
Xerxes
This explains a lot. AfD is a locker room connected by carbon fibre List of precedents to prove that WP:GAMEGUIDE was wrong all along. Stutter step (tennis), Golf swing, Category:Chess openings, Category:Bridge squeezes, and in a crazy turnaround, an entire subcategory, the main category of which has been hacked to pieces at AfD: cat:Martial arts moves
SPA Paranoia: SPA is indistinguishable from the majority of WP editors who make one edit to an article and never edit again This article was created by an SPA and is about a non-notable martial art.[1]
Sante Kimes
- with this AfD's kind of attitude, WP is probably either sued a lot or will be In fact, the worst behaviour is in the AfD; the article is relatively speaking, unbiased. 'fleecing'? is the only word that can be replaced, although the summary style is not purely factual. This one is worth keeping not only just for the AfD, but only for the AfD. "Tough crap if it's 'biased' - she's a convicted murderer." Delicious junk food.
