Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.
Difference between revisions of "User talk:Anonymity"
(→What anarchism is not.) |
(→What anarchism is not.) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
I am an anarcho-communist. A great deal of Kropoktininblack's edits seem to be basically attacks on anarcho-capitalism. I agree that the other version isn't perfect, but his is basically a rant. [[User:Zazaban|Zazaban]] 14:54, 14 February 2008 (UTC) | I am an anarcho-communist. A great deal of Kropoktininblack's edits seem to be basically attacks on anarcho-capitalism. I agree that the other version isn't perfect, but his is basically a rant. [[User:Zazaban|Zazaban]] 14:54, 14 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
: I was simply reverting the entire thing, I didn't fish through it. And I did try to negotiate with him earlier on. Also, I disagree totally that anarcho-capitalism is some statist conspiracy to destroy anarchism, I think that's insane. [[User:Zazaban|Zazaban]] 20:08, 14 February 2008 (UTC) | : I was simply reverting the entire thing, I didn't fish through it. And I did try to negotiate with him earlier on. Also, I disagree totally that anarcho-capitalism is some statist conspiracy to destroy anarchism, I think that's insane. [[User:Zazaban|Zazaban]] 20:08, 14 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Anonymity, KiB was a frustrating poster here who, although I think was genuine in his concern, was extremely overzealous and confused not attacking a philosophy with supporting it. Both me an Zazaban tried to negotiate with him suggesting a possible cooperation, but he would not here of it instead turning much of his post into rant. There was little information contained within his edits. Originally the 'what anarchism is not' article was immature, as was Kropotkins edits. I'm an Agorist. Please do not confuse this with your standard Anarcho-Capitalist. The first quote where I distinguish between different types of libertarianism was supposed to provide a clear distinction between the 'Americanised' usage by designating it with a L and the European with a l. I was not insinuating anything (in fact I was trying to keep things as unbiased as possible and merely trying to point out that Anarcho-Capitalists as well as other market Anarchists reject them. If there is ''some'' common ground between Anarcho-Capitalists and, as many here would put it, the vast majority of Anarchists, what is wrong with that? | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::The latter block you quoted was a clean up of a previous contribution. If you want to further add to it, go ahead. I tried not to add or remove anything and to get to the point of the matter. I realise it is a social Anarchist criticism of Anarcho-Capitalism so I tried not to go either way - I try not to edit things that don't reflect my views. It's just that the original piece needed a clean up and no one else seemed to be bothered.--[[User:RoyceChristian|RoyceChristian]] 11:40, 15 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:07, 15 February 2008
Thanks
Thanks for bringing up the subject of "sysop". I thought everyone here was a sysop too, but I'm still a little confused. I guess not everyone is one. I don't know. --Grrrlriot 16:39, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
What anarchism is not.
I am an anarcho-communist. A great deal of Kropoktininblack's edits seem to be basically attacks on anarcho-capitalism. I agree that the other version isn't perfect, but his is basically a rant. Zazaban 14:54, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
- I was simply reverting the entire thing, I didn't fish through it. And I did try to negotiate with him earlier on. Also, I disagree totally that anarcho-capitalism is some statist conspiracy to destroy anarchism, I think that's insane. Zazaban 20:08, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Anonymity, KiB was a frustrating poster here who, although I think was genuine in his concern, was extremely overzealous and confused not attacking a philosophy with supporting it. Both me an Zazaban tried to negotiate with him suggesting a possible cooperation, but he would not here of it instead turning much of his post into rant. There was little information contained within his edits. Originally the 'what anarchism is not' article was immature, as was Kropotkins edits. I'm an Agorist. Please do not confuse this with your standard Anarcho-Capitalist. The first quote where I distinguish between different types of libertarianism was supposed to provide a clear distinction between the 'Americanised' usage by designating it with a L and the European with a l. I was not insinuating anything (in fact I was trying to keep things as unbiased as possible and merely trying to point out that Anarcho-Capitalists as well as other market Anarchists reject them. If there is some common ground between Anarcho-Capitalists and, as many here would put it, the vast majority of Anarchists, what is wrong with that?
- The latter block you quoted was a clean up of a previous contribution. If you want to further add to it, go ahead. I tried not to add or remove anything and to get to the point of the matter. I realise it is a social Anarchist criticism of Anarcho-Capitalism so I tried not to go either way - I try not to edit things that don't reflect my views. It's just that the original piece needed a clean up and no one else seemed to be bothered.--RoyceChristian 11:40, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
