Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.
Difference between revisions of "Against post-structuralism and post-modernism"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''Against post-structuralism and post-modernism''' | + | '''Against [[post-structuralism]] and [[post-modernism]]''' |
| − | * Abolition of power and the objective identity. | + | * Abolition of [[power]] and the [[objective identity]]. |
| − | * The influence of nazi philosophy on post-structuralism and postmodernism. | + | * The influence of [[nazi philosophy]] on post-structuralism and postmodernism. |
| − | * Anti-modern anarchism = Anti-political economy = Anti-post- | + | * Anti-modern [[anarchism]] = Anti-[[political economy]] = Anti-post-structuralist anarchism. |
* The anti-political anti-philosophy of anti-post-stucturalist anarchism. | * The anti-political anti-philosophy of anti-post-stucturalist anarchism. | ||
| − | * From resistance to a revolution. | + | * From [[resistance]] to a [[revolution]]. |
| − | * Anti-authoritarianism and the abolition of capitalism. | + | * [[Anti-authoritarianism]] and the abolition of [[capitalism]]. |
| − | * If you are equal then you have nothing to worry about. | + | * If you are [[equal]] then you have [[nothing to worry about]]. |
| − | This is about an armchair pseudo-radical demagogy coming from abstract theo-alienated professors propagating a simulative mass and individual subjective paralysis. | + | This is about an armchair pseudo-radical [[demagogy]] coming from abstract theo-alienated professors propagating a simulative mass and [[individual subjective paralysis]]. |
| − | Post-modern intellectuals and post-structuralism theorists the like of Michel Foucault, Jean Baudrillard, Gilles Deleuze, Jean-Francois Lyotard and Jacques Derrida are all influenced by a nazi philosopher called Karl Schmidt and other fascist theoreticians. | + | Post-modern intellectuals and post-structuralism theorists the like of [[Michel Foucault]], [[Jean Baudrillard]], [[Gilles Deleuze]], [[Jean-Francois Lyotard]] and [[Jacques Derrida]] are all influenced by a nazi philosopher called [[Karl Schmidt]] and other fascist theoreticians. |
| − | Post-modern theorists, especially Michel Foucault and Jean Budrillard have given us a cowardice and abstract pseudo-critique of Western society. These theorists are often used by quasi-anarchist academics to provide us with a very misleading and dishonest interpretation of power and wrong analysis of revolutionary subjectivity and rebellion. | + | Post-modern theorists, especially Michel Foucault and Jean Budrillard have given us a cowardice and abstract pseudo-critique of [[Western society]]. These theorists are often used by quasi-anarchist academics to provide us with a very misleading and dishonest interpretation of power and wrong analysis of [[revolutionary subjectivity]] and [[rebellion]]. |
| − | There will never be any intersection between anarchism and post-structural / post-modern thought. Leave anarchy alone, it does not belong to post-structuralist academic rubbish | + | There will never be any intersection between anarchism and post-structural / post-modern thought. Leave anarchy alone, it does not belong to post-structuralist academic rubbish wrapped in postmodern campus jargon to impress the stupid and the [[repressed]]. |
Foucault, Budrillard, Deleuze, Loytard, Derrida and much more academic junk is shoved down our throat as anarchy. | Foucault, Budrillard, Deleuze, Loytard, Derrida and much more academic junk is shoved down our throat as anarchy. | ||
Day in and day out we encounter these quasi-leftist academic intellectuals masquerading as revolutionary anarchists that obviously they are not and far from it. | Day in and day out we encounter these quasi-leftist academic intellectuals masquerading as revolutionary anarchists that obviously they are not and far from it. | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
Revolutions begin in the streets and in society not in the campus or the library. Revolution is not a play in abstract tautological terminology and cheap psychology but a direct conscious action. | Revolutions begin in the streets and in society not in the campus or the library. Revolution is not a play in abstract tautological terminology and cheap psychology but a direct conscious action. | ||
Post-modernism and post-structuralism are reactionary petty-academic ideologies created in the university to defuse the real social upheaval that is taking place everywhere. | Post-modernism and post-structuralism are reactionary petty-academic ideologies created in the university to defuse the real social upheaval that is taking place everywhere. | ||
| − | We don’t want intellectuals that sell their services to the state and to capitalism, these tendencies were created to deform and distort anarchism and turn it into mechanical impotence. | + | We don’t want intellectuals that sell their services to [[the state]] and to capitalism, these tendencies were created to deform and distort anarchism and turn it into mechanical impotence. |
Our essence is what we make it to be. | Our essence is what we make it to be. | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
Our identity is revolutionary anarchist. | Our identity is revolutionary anarchist. | ||
| − | Our ethic is meta-ethical. | + | Our ethic is [[meta-ethics|meta-ethical]]. |
| − | Our exchange is gift. | + | Our exchange is [[gift]]. |
[[Category:Essays]] | [[Category:Essays]] | ||
[[Category:Post-structuralism]] | [[Category:Post-structuralism]] | ||
[[Category:Post-modernism]] | [[Category:Post-modernism]] | ||
Latest revision as of 08:19, 20 November 2007
Against post-structuralism and post-modernism
- Abolition of power and the objective identity.
- The influence of nazi philosophy on post-structuralism and postmodernism.
- Anti-modern anarchism = Anti-political economy = Anti-post-structuralist anarchism.
- The anti-political anti-philosophy of anti-post-stucturalist anarchism.
- From resistance to a revolution.
- Anti-authoritarianism and the abolition of capitalism.
- If you are equal then you have nothing to worry about.
This is about an armchair pseudo-radical demagogy coming from abstract theo-alienated professors propagating a simulative mass and individual subjective paralysis. Post-modern intellectuals and post-structuralism theorists the like of Michel Foucault, Jean Baudrillard, Gilles Deleuze, Jean-Francois Lyotard and Jacques Derrida are all influenced by a nazi philosopher called Karl Schmidt and other fascist theoreticians.
Post-modern theorists, especially Michel Foucault and Jean Budrillard have given us a cowardice and abstract pseudo-critique of Western society. These theorists are often used by quasi-anarchist academics to provide us with a very misleading and dishonest interpretation of power and wrong analysis of revolutionary subjectivity and rebellion. There will never be any intersection between anarchism and post-structural / post-modern thought. Leave anarchy alone, it does not belong to post-structuralist academic rubbish wrapped in postmodern campus jargon to impress the stupid and the repressed. Foucault, Budrillard, Deleuze, Loytard, Derrida and much more academic junk is shoved down our throat as anarchy. Day in and day out we encounter these quasi-leftist academic intellectuals masquerading as revolutionary anarchists that obviously they are not and far from it. They are cashing on anarchy at any cost, because they know that we are the sole future. There is no connection what so ever between anarchy and these academicians and professors with there for idiot’s theorization. Anarchism and anarchy is beyond their bolo bolo mambo jambo to impress the students with their high Latin terminology. Lots of blah blah and plenty of fear of action. Revolutions begin in the streets and in society not in the campus or the library. Revolution is not a play in abstract tautological terminology and cheap psychology but a direct conscious action. Post-modernism and post-structuralism are reactionary petty-academic ideologies created in the university to defuse the real social upheaval that is taking place everywhere. We don’t want intellectuals that sell their services to the state and to capitalism, these tendencies were created to deform and distort anarchism and turn it into mechanical impotence.
Our essence is what we make it to be.
Our identity is revolutionary anarchist.
Our ethic is meta-ethical.
Our exchange is gift.
