Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.
Difference between revisions of "Template talk:wikipedia"
From Anarchopedia
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ==Deleting thist template== | ||
delete this! why? wikipedia everytime deleted source:anarchopedia | delete this! why? wikipedia everytime deleted source:anarchopedia | ||
| Line 8: | Line 9: | ||
:For them i think it is sufficient to mention the source (1) in the article history or (2) in the talk page of the article. | :For them i think it is sufficient to mention the source (1) in the article history or (2) in the talk page of the article. | ||
:Perhaps we could do the same on Anarchopedia? ~[[User:Rev 22|''Rev 22'']] 19:44, 3 May 2006 (UTC) | :Perhaps we could do the same on Anarchopedia? ~[[User:Rev 22|''Rev 22'']] 19:44, 3 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::I would like to disagree with that. 1: There is no reason to copy the behaviour of [[Wikipedia]], if they disrespect the whole Free License community we do not have to jump on board. 2: Wikipedia is not the only refference template that exists, other templates are out there also, i believe they serve as useful tools of building up the community on the [[Internet]]. 3: I think if somebody is doing a research on the subject we must make it as easy for them as possible. And ok, you might say, nobody will use [[Anarchopedia]] as the source for the PhD paper, but somebody might if they are writing for a magazine or an online resource. [[User:Beta_M|Beta_M]] (VolodyA! V Anarhist) <sup>[{{SERVER}}{{localurl:User_talk:Beta_M|action=edit§ion=new}} Talk]</sup> {{{1|21:34}}} | ||
Revision as of 21:34, 3 May 2006
Deleting thist template
delete this! why? wikipedia everytime deleted source:anarchopedia
enough reason?
wikipedia fight against us and we make promotion for this project ???
- That is true, I have never seen Wikipedia source other GFDL projects in the article itself.
- For them i think it is sufficient to mention the source (1) in the article history or (2) in the talk page of the article.
- Perhaps we could do the same on Anarchopedia? ~Rev 22 19:44, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
- I would like to disagree with that. 1: There is no reason to copy the behaviour of Wikipedia, if they disrespect the whole Free License community we do not have to jump on board. 2: Wikipedia is not the only refference template that exists, other templates are out there also, i believe they serve as useful tools of building up the community on the Internet. 3: I think if somebody is doing a research on the subject we must make it as easy for them as possible. And ok, you might say, nobody will use Anarchopedia as the source for the PhD paper, but somebody might if they are writing for a magazine or an online resource. Beta_M (VolodyA! V Anarhist) Talk 21:34
