Talk:2003 invasion of Iraq

Occasionally, even governments as authoritarian at that of the United States get it right somewhere. While President Bush's intentions are contemptable (democracy is just another form of governement, after all), he and his staff are at least competent enough to get the job done right. One can only hope that the formerly governed nation of Iraq will continue in this run of unbelievable progress — perhaps a civil war is all that's needed?

After it has evolved to a state of pure anarchy, the Bush administration can spend its remaining years dismantling the power structures of the American gulf and eventually — knock on wood — the three-branch system of government.

In all seriousness, I'm just trying to start a discussion here. Any thoughts?

Witty satire, but I think you are grossly confusing civil war, warlordism and colonization (the current state of Iraq) with anarchy. Anarchy is characterized by the absence of coercion, which clearly isn't the present state of Iraq (or Somalia for that matter). ~Rev 22 20:42, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Wonderful, but there doesn't appear to be any article at this point. Zazaban 07:24, 10 February 2008 (UTC)