Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.

Difference between revisions of "User talk:SocialistQueer"

From Anarchopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Agreed)
(Apologies, I was logged out for that one)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Excuse my english...be careful what you write, Anarchopedia must not make propaganda pro-pedophilia.--[[User:Antispam|Antispam]] 08:49, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
 
Excuse my english...be careful what you write, Anarchopedia must not make propaganda pro-pedophilia.--[[User:Antispam|Antispam]] 08:49, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
 
: Agreed, I agree that Anarchopedia should not support paedophilia, and I'm actually trying to edit a number of articles copied from the pro-paedophilia "BoyWiki", in order to present them in a more neutral tone.
 
: Agreed, I agree that Anarchopedia should not support paedophilia, and I'm actually trying to edit a number of articles copied from the pro-paedophilia "BoyWiki", in order to present them in a more neutral tone.
: The point about paedophiles being "rightly" stigmatised in society (which I guess is what you are referring to) was not appropriate to say IMO. But I don't see how that constitutes pro-paedophile propaganda. [[Special:Contributions/66.249.93.171|66.249.93.171]] 16:44, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
+
: The point about paedophiles being "rightly" stigmatised in society (which I guess is what you are referring to) was not appropriate to say IMO. But I don't see how that constitutes pro-paedophile propaganda. – [[User:SocialistQueer|SocialistQueer]] <sup>([[User talk:SocialistQueer|talk]])</sup> 16:46, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:46, 8 February 2015

Excuse my english...be careful what you write, Anarchopedia must not make propaganda pro-pedophilia.--Antispam 08:49, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Agreed, I agree that Anarchopedia should not support paedophilia, and I'm actually trying to edit a number of articles copied from the pro-paedophilia "BoyWiki", in order to present them in a more neutral tone.
The point about paedophiles being "rightly" stigmatised in society (which I guess is what you are referring to) was not appropriate to say IMO. But I don't see how that constitutes pro-paedophile propaganda. – SocialistQueer (talk) 16:46, 8 February 2015 (UTC)