Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.
Difference between revisions of "User talk:SocialistQueer"
From Anarchopedia
(New page: Excuse my english...be careful what you write, Anarchopedia must not make propaganda pro-pedophilia.--~~~~) |
(Apologies, I was logged out for that one) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Excuse my english...be careful what you write, Anarchopedia must not make propaganda pro-pedophilia.--[[User:Antispam|Antispam]] 08:49, 8 February 2015 (UTC) | Excuse my english...be careful what you write, Anarchopedia must not make propaganda pro-pedophilia.--[[User:Antispam|Antispam]] 08:49, 8 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
| + | : Agreed, I agree that Anarchopedia should not support paedophilia, and I'm actually trying to edit a number of articles copied from the pro-paedophilia "BoyWiki", in order to present them in a more neutral tone. | ||
| + | : The point about paedophiles being "rightly" stigmatised in society (which I guess is what you are referring to) was not appropriate to say IMO. But I don't see how that constitutes pro-paedophile propaganda. – [[User:SocialistQueer|SocialistQueer]] <sup>([[User talk:SocialistQueer|talk]])</sup> 16:46, 8 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 16:46, 8 February 2015
Excuse my english...be careful what you write, Anarchopedia must not make propaganda pro-pedophilia.--Antispam 08:49, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
- Agreed, I agree that Anarchopedia should not support paedophilia, and I'm actually trying to edit a number of articles copied from the pro-paedophilia "BoyWiki", in order to present them in a more neutral tone.
- The point about paedophiles being "rightly" stigmatised in society (which I guess is what you are referring to) was not appropriate to say IMO. But I don't see how that constitutes pro-paedophile propaganda. – SocialistQueer (talk) 16:46, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
