Difference between revisions of "User talk:Krähe"

Revision as of 16:20, 5 January 2011

Hello and Thank You

Welcome to Anarchopedia. Thanks for your edit to Talk:LGBT themes in horror fiction?. It's my fault, but you misunderstand the reason for the category. See the Talk page for a suggestion on how to fix my mistake; I would be interested to see whether you agree, or other suggestions. Anarchangel 23:22, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Hey there. Right, I misunderstood the intention of the article. Your suggestion is fine with me. Perhaps we shoud have a "suggest articles for deletion on anarchopedia - site though. What do you mean? Krähe 23:58, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your agreement.

Template:Drunken Black Cat Award is an attempt at nominating pages for deletion, but it is more often misunderstood than my category :) Also, I do not find the number or type of pages to be a problem at present.

No wonder, its named nowhere in the description. Type of pages i sometimes problematic for me. The question is though, if deletion is a better option than rewriting. Not quite decided yet. Krähe

Are you User talk:93.128.95.200?

(who pointed out that ways by which government causes poverty was flawed)

si Krähe

Either way, I draw your attention to this from republicrat, as another example of how User:Complacency is insanity operates:

"One of the major purposes of the republicratic duopoly is to prevent the imposition of a maximum income limit, which has widespread popular support. Another purpose of the republicratic duopoly is to keep unemployment high so as to give business owners great leverage over people; republicrats do that by preventing the imposition of laws that would forbid business owners from laying people off and/or require business owners to hire people when they can."

I wanted to delete this straight away, as it is a 'black is white' contradiction. But 'insanity' has written a lot, and uses page protection a lot. I do not want to start an edit war until I am sure I can finish one, so let us approach this carefully. Just a request for your comments, for now. Anarchangel 09:45, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Obviously there is no interest in construcitve discussion, or writing/increasing the quality of any articel. Is it possible to ban trolls like this? Krähe 15:33, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Ha ha ha ha! How pathetic! You can't stand having a political opponent who sees the truth all too clearly, so you resort to the sociopathic gestapo tactic of libelling your opponent so as to try to get them banned. Are you by chance trying to pass off that bullying you did on my talk page as an attempt to initiate constructive discussion? And you actually call yourself an anarchist? Hilarious! That's precisely how folks like Stalin came to power. Complacency is insanity 16:17, 5 January 2011 (UTC)