Difference between revisions of "Talk:religion"

Revision as of 16:54, 16 October 2007

It's funny - but is it useful?

Ummm the "oppossing views" section, whilst mildly amusing, could use a few sources, since it is claiming as fact something that has never been proven.

Also, wouldn't an article about religion and it's relationship with anarchy be more useful than the current article, which is largely just atheist propganda.

This article contains little in the way of infomation.

I didn't really want to change it without asking first, but I'm struggling to see the purpose of this article in it's current form. It looks more like an uncyclopedia piece