Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:boy"
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Exactly what kind of Anarchists are they anyway? Paedophilianarchists? | Exactly what kind of Anarchists are they anyway? Paedophilianarchists? | ||
| − | and does one delete pages? =) | + | and how does one delete pages? =) --David Vanzetti 20:08, 5 September 2009 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 20:08, 5 September 2009
"For some boylovers, for example, a young-looking sixteen-year-old still appeals to them as a boy whereas an old-looking fourteen-year-old may not. Thus, when describing someone as a "boy," we must understand that, while there are vast areas of agreement, there is still a small hazier area in the middle where disagreement should be expected."
Is that a usefull information for anarchists??? I doubt it...
there is an ongoing discussion about the need of pro paedophilian articles in the English Anarchopedia: Talk:paedophilia --Maly Krtek 19:58, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Exactly what kind of Anarchists are they anyway? Paedophilianarchists?
and how does one delete pages? =) --David Vanzetti 20:08, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
