Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.

Difference between revisions of "Talk:boy"

From Anarchopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(link to the discussion)
 
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
there is an ongoing discussion about the need of pro paedophilian articles in the English Anarchopedia: [[Talk:paedophilia]] --[[User:Maly krtek|Maly Krtek]] 19:58, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
 
there is an ongoing discussion about the need of pro paedophilian articles in the English Anarchopedia: [[Talk:paedophilia]] --[[User:Maly krtek|Maly Krtek]] 19:58, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
 +
Exactly what kind of Anarchists are they anyway? Paedophilianarchists?
 +
 +
and does one delete pages? =)

Revision as of 20:08, 5 September 2009

"For some boylovers, for example, a young-looking sixteen-year-old still appeals to them as a boy whereas an old-looking fourteen-year-old may not. Thus, when describing someone as a "boy," we must understand that, while there are vast areas of agreement, there is still a small hazier area in the middle where disagreement should be expected."

Is that a usefull information for anarchists??? I doubt it...

there is an ongoing discussion about the need of pro paedophilian articles in the English Anarchopedia: Talk:paedophilia --Maly Krtek 19:58, 5 September 2009 (UTC)


Exactly what kind of Anarchists are they anyway? Paedophilianarchists?

and does one delete pages? =)